远程 Oracle Linux 10 / 9 主机上存在安装的程序包该程序包受到 ELSA-2025-20530 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    - sunrpc在 svc auth 处理期间将 SVC_GARBAGE 处理为认证错误 (Jeff Layton) [Orabug: 38137447] {CVE-2025-38089}
    - 添加 Zen34 客户端 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/process在 MONITOR 之前移动缓冲区清除 (Kim Phillips) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - 添加正常计数器 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - KVMSVM向客户机公告 TSA CPUID 位 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷添加临时计划程序攻击缓解 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Debian 11 主机上安装的多个程序包受到 dla-4076 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian LTS 公告 DLA-4076-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Ben Hutchings 2025 年 3 月 1 日 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS-------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux-6.1 版本：6.1.6.1.128-1~deb11u1 CVE ID：CVE-2022-49034 CVE-2023-52916 CVE-2023-52926 CVE-2024-26595 CVE-2024-27407 CVE-2024-35870 CVE-2024-35956 CVE-2024-36476 CVE-2024-36479 CVE-2024-36899 CVE-2024-37021 CVE-2024-39282 CVE-2024-41014 CVE-2024-42252 CVE-2024-42315 CVE-2024-42319 CVE-2024-43098 CVE-2024-44950 CVE-2024-45828 CVE-2024-46809 CVE-2024-46841 CVE-2024-46896 CVE-2024-47143 CVE-2024-47408 CVE-2024-47745 CVE-2024-48881 CVE-2024-49571 CVE-2024-49861 CVE-2024-49891 CVE-2024-49897 CVE-2024-49898 CVE-2024-49899 CVE-2024-49909 CVE-2024-49911 CVE-2024-49915 CVE-2024-49917 CVE-2024-49925 CVE-2024-49929 CVE-2024-49934 CVE-2024-49939 CVE-2024-49951 CVE-2024-49994 CVE-2024-49996 CVE-2024-50014 CVE-2024-50047 CVE-2024-50051 CVE-2024-50055 CVE-2024-50121 CVE-2024-50146 CVE-2024-50164 CVE-2024-50248 CVE-2024-50258 CVE-2024-50275 CVE-2024-50304 CVE-2024-52332 CVE-2024-53099 CVE-2024-53105 CVE-2024-53124 CVE-2024-53125 CVE-2024-53128 CVE-2024-53141 CVE-2024-53142 CVE-2024-53145 CVE-2024-53146 CVE-2024-53148 CVE-2024-53150 CVE-2024-53151 CVE-2024-53154 CVE-2024-53155 CVE-2024-53156 CVE-2024-53157 CVE-2024-53158 CVE-2024-53161 CVE-2024-53164 CVE-2024-53165 CVE-2024-53170 CVE-2024-53171 CVE-2024-53172 CVE-2024-53173 CVE-2024-53174 CVE-2024-53175 CVE-2024-53180 CVE-2024-53181 CVE-2024-53183 CVE-2024-53184 CVE-2024-53190 CVE-2024-53194 CVE-2024-53196 CVE-2024-53197 CVE-2024-53198 CVE-2024-53206 CVE-2024-53207 CVE-2024-53208 CVE-2024-53210 CVE-2024-53213 CVE-2024-53214 CVE-2024-53215 CVE-2024-53217 CVE-2024-53220 CVE-2024-53226 CVE-2024-53227 CVE-2024-53229 CVE-2024-53230 CVE-2024-53231 CVE-2024-53233 CVE-2024-53234 CVE-2024-53237 CVE-2024-53239 CVE-2024-53240 CVE-2024-53241 CVE-2024-53680 CVE-2024-53685 CVE-2024-53690 CVE-2024-54031 CVE-2024-55881 CVE-2024-55916 CVE-2024-56369 CVE-2024-56531 CVE-2024-56532 CVE-2024-56533 CVE-2024-56539 CVE-2024-56546 CVE-2024-56548 CVE-2024-56551 CVE-2024-56557 CVE-2024-56558 CVE-2024-56562 CVE-2024-56567 CVE-2024-56568 CVE-2024-56569 CVE-2024-56570 CVE-2024-56572 CVE-2024-56574 CVE-2024-56575 CVE-2024-56576 CVE-2024-56578 CVE-2024-56579 CVE-2024-56581 CVE-2024-56582 CVE-2024-56584 CVE-2024-56585 CVE-2024-56586 CVE-2024-56587 CVE-2024-56589 CVE-2024-56590 CVE-2024-56593 CVE-2024-56594 CVE-2024-56595 CVE-2024-56596 CVE-2024-56597 CVE-2024-56598 CVE-2024-56599 CVE-2024-56600 CVE-2024-56601 CVE-2024-56602 CVE-2024-56603 CVE-2024-56604 CVE-2024-56605 CVE-2024-56606 CVE-2024-56608 CVE-2024-56610 CVE-2024-56614 CVE-2024-56615 CVE-2024-56616 CVE-2024-56619 CVE-2024-56622 CVE-2024-56623 CVE-2024-56625 CVE-2024-56626 CVE-2024-56627 CVE-2024-56628 CVE-2024-56629 CVE-2024-56630 CVE-2024-56631 CVE-2024-56633 CVE-2024-56634 CVE-2024-56636 CVE-2024-56637 CVE-2024-56640 CVE-2024-56642 CVE-2024-56643 CVE-2024-56644 CVE-2024-56645 CVE-2024-56648 CVE-2024-56650 CVE-2024-56651 CVE-2024-56658 CVE-2024-56659 CVE-2024-56660 CVE-2024-56661 CVE-2024-56662 CVE-2024-56663 CVE-2024-56664 CVE-2024-56665 CVE-2024-56670 CVE-2024-56672 CVE-2024-56675 CVE-2024-56677 CVE-2024-56678 CVE-2024-56679 CVE-2024-56681 CVE-2024-56683 CVE-2024-56687 CVE-2024-56688 CVE-2024-56690 CVE-2024-56691 CVE-2024-56693 CVE-2024-56694 CVE-2024-56698 CVE-2024-56700 CVE-2024-56701 CVE-2024-56703 CVE-2024-56704 CVE-2024-56705 CVE-2024-56707 CVE-2024-56708 CVE-2024-56709 CVE-2024-56715 CVE-2024-56716 CVE-2024-56717 CVE-2024-56718 CVE-2024-56720 CVE-2024-56722 CVE-2024-56723 CVE-2024-56724 CVE-2024-56725 CVE-2024-56726 CVE-2024-56727 CVE-2024-56728 CVE-2024-56739 CVE-2024-56741 CVE-2024-56745 CVE-2024-56746 CVE-2024-56747 CVE-2024-56748 CVE-2024-56751 CVE-2024-56754 CVE-2024-56755 CVE-2024-56756 CVE-2024-56759 CVE-2024-56763 CVE-2024-56765 CVE-2024-56766 CVE-2024-56767 CVE-2024-56769 CVE-2024-56770 CVE-2024-56774 CVE-2024-56776 CVE-2024-56777 CVE-2024-56778 CVE-2024-56779 CVE-2024-56780 CVE-2024-56781 CVE-2024-56783 CVE-2024-56785 CVE-2024-56787 CVE-2024-57791 CVE-2024-57792 CVE-2024-57798 CVE-2024-57802 CVE-2024-57807 CVE-2024-57838 CVE-2024-57841 CVE-2024-57849 CVE-2024-57850 CVE-2024-57874 CVE-2024-57876 CVE-2024-57882 CVE-2024-57884 CVE-2024-57887 CVE-2024-57889 CVE-2024-57890 CVE-2024-57892 CVE-2024-57893 CVE-2024-57894 CVE-2024-57896 CVE-2024-57897 CVE-2024-57900 CVE-2024-57901 CVE-2024-57902 CVE-2024-57903 CVE-2024-57904 CVE-2024-57906 CVE-2024-57907 CVE-2024-57908 CVE-2024-57910 CVE-2024-57911 CVE-2024-57912 CVE-2024-57913 CVE-2024-57916 CVE-2024-57917 CVE-2024-57922 CVE-2024-57925 CVE-2024-57929 CVE-2024-57930 CVE-2024-57931 CVE-2024-57938 CVE-2024-57939 CVE-2024-57940 CVE-2024-57946 CVE-2024-57948 CVE-2024-57949 CVE-2024-57951 CVE-2025-21629 CVE-2025-21631 CVE-2025-21636 CVE-2025-21637 CVE-2025-21638 CVE-2025-21639 CVE-2025-21640 CVE-2025-21646 CVE-2025-21647 CVE-2025-21648 CVE-2025-21653 CVE-2025-21655 CVE-2025-21660 CVE-2025-21662 CVE-2025-21664 CVE-2025-21665 CVE-2025-21666 CVE-2025-21667 CVE-2025-21668 CVE-2025-21669 CVE-2025-21671 CVE-2025-21675 CVE-2025-21678 CVE-2025-21680 CVE-2025-21681 CVE-2025-21683 CVE-2025-21687 CVE-2025-21688 CVE-2025-21689 CVE-2025-21690 CVE-2025-21692 CVE-2025-21694 CVE-2025-21697 CVE-2025-21699

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于 Debian 11 bullseye，这些问题已在 6.1.6.1.128-1~deb11u1 版本中修复。其中还额外包含了来自于稳定更新 6.1.120-6.1.128（含）的大量错误修复。

    建议您升级 linux-6.1 程序包。

    如需了解 linux-6.1 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux-6.1

    有关 Debian LTS 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://wiki.debian.org/LTSAttachment:signature.ascDescription: PGP signature

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Debian 11 主机上安装的多个程序包受到 dla-4075 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian LTS 公告 DLA-4075-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Ben Hutchings 2025 年 3 月 1 日 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS-------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux 版本：5.10.234-1 CVE ID：CVE-2021-47469 CVE-2023-52530 CVE-2023-52917 CVE-2024-26921 CVE-2024-27017 CVE-2024-27072 CVE-2024-35965 CVE-2024-35966 CVE-2024-36476 CVE-2024-36899 CVE-2024-38538 CVE-2024-38544 CVE-2024-38588 CVE-2024-38591 CVE-2024-39497 CVE-2024-40953 CVE-2024-41016 CVE-2024-41060 CVE-2024-41080 CVE-2024-42315 CVE-2024-43098 CVE-2024-44931 CVE-2024-44940 CVE-2024-46695 CVE-2024-46809 CVE-2024-46841 CVE-2024-46849 CVE-2024-46853 CVE-2024-46854 CVE-2024-46858 CVE-2024-46865 CVE-2024-47143 CVE-2024-47670 CVE-2024-47671 CVE-2024-47672 CVE-2024-47674 CVE-2024-47679 CVE-2024-47684 CVE-2024-47685 CVE-2024-47692 CVE-2024-47696 CVE-2024-47697 CVE-2024-47698 CVE-2024-47699 CVE-2024-47701 CVE-2024-47705 CVE-2024-47706 CVE-2024-47707 CVE-2024-47709 CVE-2024-47710 CVE-2024-47712 CVE-2024-47713 CVE-2024-47718 CVE-2024-47723 CVE-2024-47735 CVE-2024-47737 CVE-2024-47739 CVE-2024-47740 CVE-2024-47742 CVE-2024-47748 CVE-2024-47749 CVE-2024-47756 CVE-2024-47757 CVE-2024-48881 CVE-2024-49851 CVE-2024-49858 CVE-2024-49860 CVE-2024-49863 CVE-2024-49867 CVE-2024-49868 CVE-2024-49875 CVE-2024-49877 CVE-2024-49878 CVE-2024-49879 CVE-2024-49881 CVE-2024-49882 CVE-2024-49883 CVE-2024-49884 CVE-2024-49889 CVE-2024-49890 CVE-2024-49892 CVE-2024-49894 CVE-2024-49895 CVE-2024-49896 CVE-2024-49900 CVE-2024-49902 CVE-2024-49903 CVE-2024-49907 CVE-2024-49913 CVE-2024-49930 CVE-2024-49933 CVE-2024-49936 CVE-2024-49938 CVE-2024-49944 CVE-2024-49948 CVE-2024-49949 CVE-2024-49952 CVE-2024-49955 CVE-2024-49957 CVE-2024-49958 CVE-2024-49959 CVE-2024-49962 CVE-2024-49963 CVE-2024-49965 CVE-2024-49966 CVE-2024-49969 CVE-2024-49973 CVE-2024-49974 CVE-2024-49975 CVE-2024-49977 CVE-2024-49981 CVE-2024-49982 CVE-2024-49983 CVE-2024-49985 CVE-2024-49995 CVE-2024-49996 CVE-2024-50001 CVE-2024-50006 CVE-2024-50007 CVE-2024-50008 CVE-2024-50010 CVE-2024-50013 CVE-2024-50015 CVE-2024-50024 CVE-2024-50033 CVE-2024-50035 CVE-2024-50036 CVE-2024-50039 CVE-2024-50040 CVE-2024-50044 CVE-2024-50045 CVE-2024-50046 CVE-2024-50049 CVE-2024-50055 CVE-2024-50058 CVE-2024-50059 CVE-2024-50072 CVE-2024-50074 CVE-2024-50082 CVE-2024-50083 CVE-2024-50095 CVE-2024-50096 CVE-2024-50099 CVE-2024-50103 CVE-2024-50115 CVE-2024-50116 CVE-2024-50117 CVE-2024-50121 CVE-2024-50127 CVE-2024-50131 CVE-2024-50134 CVE-2024-50142 CVE-2024-50148 CVE-2024-50150 CVE-2024-50151 CVE-2024-50153 CVE-2024-50167 CVE-2024-50171 CVE-2024-50179 CVE-2024-50180 CVE-2024-50181 CVE-2024-50184 CVE-2024-50185 CVE-2024-50188 CVE-2024-50192 CVE-2024-50193 CVE-2024-50194 CVE-2024-50195 CVE-2024-50198 CVE-2024-50199 CVE-2024-50201 CVE-2024-50202 CVE-2024-50205 CVE-2024-50208 CVE-2024-50209 CVE-2024-50210 CVE-2024-50218 CVE-2024-50229 CVE-2024-50230 CVE-2024-50233 CVE-2024-50234 CVE-2024-50236 CVE-2024-50237 CVE-2024-50251 CVE-2024-50262 CVE-2024-50264 CVE-2024-50265 CVE-2024-50267 CVE-2024-50268 CVE-2024-50269 CVE-2024-50273 CVE-2024-50278 CVE-2024-50279 CVE-2024-50282 CVE-2024-50287 CVE-2024-50290 CVE-2024-50292 CVE-2024-50295 CVE-2024-50296 CVE-2024-50299 CVE-2024-50301 CVE-2024-50302 CVE-2024-50304 CVE-2024-52332 CVE-2024-53042 CVE-2024-53052 CVE-2024-53057 CVE-2024-53059 CVE-2024-53060 CVE-2024-53061 CVE-2024-53063 CVE-2024-53066 CVE-2024-53096 CVE-2024-53097 CVE-2024-53099 CVE-2024-53101 CVE-2024-53103 CVE-2024-53104 CVE-2024-53112 CVE-2024-53119 CVE-2024-53121 CVE-2024-53124 CVE-2024-53125 CVE-2024-53127 CVE-2024-53130 CVE-2024-53131 CVE-2024-53135 CVE-2024-53136 CVE-2024-53138 CVE-2024-53140 CVE-2024-53141 CVE-2024-53142 CVE-2024-53145 CVE-2024-53146 CVE-2024-53148 CVE-2024-53150 CVE-2024-53155 CVE-2024-53156 CVE-2024-53157 CVE-2024-53158 CVE-2024-53161 CVE-2024-53164 CVE-2024-53171 CVE-2024-53172 CVE-2024-53173 CVE-2024-53174 CVE-2024-53181 CVE-2024-53183 CVE-2024-53184 CVE-2024-53194 CVE-2024-53197 CVE-2024-53198 CVE-2024-53214 CVE-2024-53217 CVE-2024-53226 CVE-2024-53227 CVE-2024-53237 CVE-2024-53239 CVE-2024-53240 CVE-2024-53241 CVE-2024-53680 CVE-2024-53685 CVE-2024-53690 CVE-2024-54031 CVE-2024-55916 CVE-2024-56531 CVE-2024-56532 CVE-2024-56533 CVE-2024-56539 CVE-2024-56548 CVE-2024-56558 CVE-2024-56562 CVE-2024-56567 CVE-2024-56568 CVE-2024-56569 CVE-2024-56570 CVE-2024-56574 CVE-2024-56576 CVE-2024-56581 CVE-2024-56586 CVE-2024-56587 CVE-2024-56589 CVE-2024-56593 CVE-2024-56594 CVE-2024-56595 CVE-2024-56596 CVE-2024-56597 CVE-2024-56598 CVE-2024-56600 CVE-2024-56601 CVE-2024-56602 CVE-2024-56603 CVE-2024-56605 CVE-2024-56606 CVE-2024-56610 CVE-2024-56615 CVE-2024-56616 CVE-2024-56619 CVE-2024-56623 CVE-2024-56629 CVE-2024-56630 CVE-2024-56631 CVE-2024-56633 CVE-2024-56634 CVE-2024-56636 CVE-2024-56637 CVE-2024-56642 CVE-2024-56643 CVE-2024-56644 CVE-2024-56645 CVE-2024-56648 CVE-2024-56650 CVE-2024-56659 CVE-2024-56661 CVE-2024-56662 CVE-2024-56670 CVE-2024-56672 CVE-2024-56681 CVE-2024-56688 CVE-2024-56690 CVE-2024-56691 CVE-2024-56694 CVE-2024-56698 CVE-2024-56700 CVE-2024-56704 CVE-2024-56705 CVE-2024-56716 CVE-2024-56720 CVE-2024-56723 CVE-2024-56724 CVE-2024-56728 CVE-2024-56739 CVE-2024-56741 CVE-2024-56747 CVE-2024-56748 CVE-2024-56754 CVE-2024-56756 CVE-2024-56759 CVE-2024-56763 CVE-2024-56766 CVE-2024-56767 CVE-2024-56769 CVE-2024-56770 CVE-2024-56779 CVE-2024-56780 CVE-2024-57791 CVE-2024-57792 CVE-2024-57802 CVE-2024-57807 CVE-2024-57850 CVE-2024-57874 CVE-2024-57884 CVE-2024-57887 CVE-2024-57889 CVE-2024-57890 CVE-2024-57892 CVE-2024-57896 CVE-2024-57900 CVE-2024-57901 CVE-2024-57902 CVE-2024-57904 CVE-2024-57906 CVE-2024-57907 CVE-2024-57908 CVE-2024-57910 CVE-2024-57911 CVE-2024-57912 CVE-2024-57913 CVE-2024-57922 CVE-2024-57929 CVE-2024-57931 CVE-2024-57938 CVE-2024-57940 CVE-2024-57946 CVE-2024-57948 CVE-2024-57951 CVE-2025-21638 CVE-2025-21639 CVE-2025-21640 CVE-2025-21646 CVE-2025-21648 CVE-2025-21653 CVE-2025-21664 CVE-2025-21666 CVE-2025-21669 CVE-2025-21678 CVE-2025-21683 CVE-2025-21687 CVE-2025-21688 CVE-2025-21689 CVE-2025-21692 CVE-2025-21694 CVE-2025-21697 CVE-2025-21699 Debian 缺陷：1082001

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于 Debian 11 bullseye，已在 5.10.234-1 版本中修复这些问题。其中还额外包含了来自于稳定更新 5.10.227-5.10.234（含）的大量错误修复。

    建议您升级 linux 程序包。

    如需了解 linux 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有关 Debian LTS 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://wiki.debian.org/LTSAttachment:signature.ascDescription: PGP signature

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：drm/v3d: Assign job pointer to NULL before signaling the fence In commit e4b5ccd392b9 (drm/v3d: Ensure job pointer is set to NULL after job completion), we introduced a change to assign the job pointer to NULL after completing a job, indicating job completion. However, this approach created a race condition between the DRM scheduler workqueue and the IRQ execution thread. As soon as the fence is signaled in the IRQ execution thread, a new job starts to be executed. This results in a race condition where the IRQ execution thread sets the job pointer to NULL simultaneously as the `run_job()` function assigns a new job to the pointer. This race condition can lead to a NULL pointer dereference if the IRQ execution thread sets the job pointer to NULL after `run_job()` assigns it to the new job. When the new job completes and the GPU emits an interrupt, `v3d_irq()` is triggered, potentially causing a crash. [ 466.310099] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000c0 [ 466.318928] Mem abort info: [ 466.321723] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 466.325479] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 466.330807] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 466.333864] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 466.337010] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 466.341900] Data abort info: [ 466.344783] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 466.350285] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 466.355350] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 466.360677] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000089772000 [ 466.367140] [00000000000000c0] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000 [ 466.375875] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 466.382163] Modules linked in: rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_seq_device algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg bnep binfmt_misc vc4 snd_soc_hdmi_codec drm_display_helper cec brcmfmac_wcc spidev rpivid_hevc(C) drm_client_lib brcmfmac hci_uart drm_dma_helper pisp_be btbcm brcmutil snd_soc_core aes_ce_blk v4l2_mem2mem bluetooth aes_ce_cipher snd_compress videobuf2_dma_contig ghash_ce cfg80211 gf128mul snd_pcm_dmaengine videobuf2_memops ecdh_generic sha2_ce ecc videobuf2_v4l2 snd_pcm v3d sha256_arm64 rfkill videodev snd_timer sha1_ce libaes gpu_sched snd videobuf2_common sha1_generic drm_shmem_helper mc rp1_pio drm_kms_helper raspberrypi_hwmon spi_bcm2835 gpio_keys i2c_brcmstb rp1 raspberrypi_gpiomem rp1_mailbox rp1_adc nvmem_rmem uio_pdrv_genirq uio i2c_dev drm ledtrig_pattern drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight fuse dm_mod ip_tables x_tables ipv6 [ 466.458429] CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 2008 Comm: chromium Tainted: G C 6.13.0-v8+ #18 [ 466.467336] Tainted: [C]=CRAP [ 466.470306] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0 (DT) [ 466.476157] pstate: 404000c9 (nZcv daIF +PAN -UAO
    -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 466.483143] pc : v3d_irq+0x118/0x2e0 [v3d] [ 466.487258] lr :
    __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x60/0x228 [ 466.492327] sp : ffffffc080003ea0 [ 466.495646] x29:
    ffffffc080003ea0 x28: ffffff80c0c94200 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 466.502807] x26: ffffffd08dd81d7b x25:
    ffffff80c0c94200 x24: ffffff8003bdc200 [ 466.509969] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 00000000000000a7 x21:
    0000000000000000 [ 466.517130] x20: ffffff8041bb0000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000000 [466.524291] x17: ffffffafadfb0000 x16: ffffffc080000000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 466.531452] x14:
    0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 466.538613] x11: 0000000000000000 x10:
    0000000000000000 x9 : ffffffd08c527eb0 [ 466.545777] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 :
    0000000000000000 [ 466.552941] x5 : ffffffd08c4100d0 x4 : ffffffafadfb0000 x3 : ffffffc080003f70 [466.560102] x2 : ffffffc0829e8058 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 466.567263] Call trace: [466.569711] v3d_irq+0x118/0x2e0 [v3d] (P) [ 466. ---truncated--- (CVE-2025-21688)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

远程 Oracle Linux 9 主机上安装的程序包受到 ELSA-2025-20480 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    - sunrpc在 svc auth 处理期间将 SVC_GARBAGE 处理为认证错误 (Jeff Layton) [Orabug: 38178286] {CVE-2025-38089}
    - 添加 Zen34 客户端 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/process在 MONITOR 之前移动缓冲区清除 (Kim Phillips) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - 添加正常计数器 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - KVMSVM向客户机公告 TSA CPUID 位 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷添加临时计划程序攻击缓解 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷将 MDS 机械重命名为更通用的名称 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - block修复将 folio 添加到 bio (Ming Lei) [Orabug: 37844657] {CVE-2025-22122}
    - f2fs修复以避免访问未初始化的curseg (Chao Yu) [Orabug: 37844644] {CVE-2025-22123}
    - gpio: virtuser修复潜在的越界写入 (Markus Burri) [Orabug: 38095181] {CVE-2025-38082}
    - net_schedhfsc地址可重入队列两次向 eltree 添加类 (Pedro Tammela) [Orabug
    38049363] {CVE-2025-38001}
    - smb客户端修复 cifs_fill_dirent 中的释放后使用 (Zhaolong Wang) [Orabug: 38094970] {CVE-2025-38051}
    - platform/x86dell-wmi-sysman避免 current_password_store() 中的缓冲区溢出 (Vladimir Moskovkin) [Orabug: 38095141] {CVE-2025-38077}
    - ALSApcm修复 PCM OSS 层的缓冲区访问争用 (Takashi Iwai) [Orabug: 38095145] {CVE-2025-38078}
    - canbcm添加 procfs 内容缺少的 rcu 读取保护 (Oliver Hartkopp) [Orabug: 38049369] {CVE-2025-38003}
    - canbcm为 bcm_op 运行时更新添加锁定 (Oliver Hartkopp) [Orabug: 38049374] {CVE-2025-38004}
    - padata请勿泄漏 reorder_work 中的引用计数 (Dominik Grzegorzek) [Orabug38094842] {CVE-2025-38031}
    - cryptoalgif_hash - 修复 hash_accept 中的双重释放 (Ivan Pravdin) [Orabug: 38095153] {CVE-2025-38079}
    - net/tipc修复 tipc_aead_encrypt_done 中的 slab-use-after-free 读取 (Wang Liu) [Orabug: 38094978] {CVE-2025-38052}
    - sch_hfsc修复在 hfsc_enqueue() 中使用 peek 时的 qlen 核算缺陷 (Cong Wang) [Orabug: 38049357] {CVE-2025-38000}
    - idpf修复 idpf_features_check 中的 null-ptr-deref (Pavan Kumar Linga) [Orabug: 38094982] {CVE-2025-38053}
    - ptpocp限制汇总输出函数中的信号/频率计数 (Sagi Maimon) [Orabug: 38094984] {CVE-2025-38054}
    - perf/x86/intel修复包含 sample_freq 的 PEBS-via-PT 的段错误 (Adrian Hunter) [Orabug: 38094988] {CVE-2025-38055}
    - ASoCSOF: Intelhda重新加载模块时修复 UAF (Tabian Barnes) [Orabug: 38094991] {CVE-2025-38056}
    - espintcp修复 skb 泄露 (Sabrina Dubroca) [Orabug: 38094993] {CVE-2025-38057}
    - __legitimize_mnt()应在 mount_lock 下进行 MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT 检查 (Al Viro) [Orabug: 38095000] {CVE-2025-38058}
    - x86/Kconfig使 CFI_AUTO_DEFAULT 依赖于 !RUST 或 Rust >= 1.88 (Pawel Anikiel) [Orabug: 38094847] {CVE-2025-38033}
    - btrfs如果无有效 csum 树则避免空指针取消引用 (Qu Wenruo) [Orabug38095010] {CVE-2025-38059}
    - btrfs修正 btrfs__prelim_ref 中 prelim_ref 参数的顺序 (Goldwyn Rodrigues) [Orabug:
    38094856] {CVE-2025-38034}
    - nvmet-tcp不恢复空 sk_state_change (Alistair Francisco) [Orabug: 38094863] {CVE-2025-38035}
    - vxlan注释 FDB 数据争用 (Ido Schimmel) [Orabug: 38094879] {CVE-2025-38037}
    - cpufreqamd-pstate删除 set_boost 中不必要的 driver_lock (Dhananjay Ugwekar) [Orabug: 38094888] {CVE-2025-38038}
    - drm/amd/display增加 block_sequence 数组大小 (Joshua Aberback) [Orabug38095164] {CVE-2025-38080}
    - bpfcopy_verifier_state() 应复制“loop_entry”字段 (Eduard Zingerman) [Orabug38095018] {CVE-2025-38060}
    - serialmctrl_gpio将 disable_ms 拆分为 sync 和 no_sync API (Alexis Lothore) [Orabug: 38094901] {CVE-2025-38040}
    - netpktgen修复 pktgen_thread_write() 中用户指定缓冲区之外的访问 (Peter Seiderer) [Orabug
    38095024] {CVE-2025-38061}
    - genirq/msi将 IOMMU IOVA 直接存储在 msi_desc 而不是 iommu_cookie 中 (Jason Gunthorpe) [Orabug:
    38095031] {CVE-2025-38062}
    - dm修复 REQ_PREFLUSH 造成的无条件 IO 节流 (Jinliang Zheng) [Orabug38095038] {CVE-2025-38063}
    - firmwarearm_ffa设置 ffa 设备的 dma_mask (Viresh Kumar) [Orabug38094925] {CVE-2025-38043}
    - mediacx231xx设置 417 的 device_caps (Hans Verkuil) [Orabug38094934] {CVE-2025-38044}
    - Orangefs不截断文件大小 (Matthew Wilcox) [Orabug: 38095056] {CVE-2025-38065}
    - dm 缓存通过阻止设备恢复失败的重试来防止 BUG_ON (Ming-Hung Tsai) [Orabug:
    38095063] {CVE-2025-38066}
    - cryptolzo - 修复压缩缓冲区溢出 (Herbert Xu) [Orabug38095079] {CVE-2025-38068}
    - PCI 端点pci-epf-test修复导致内核 oops 的双重释放 (Christian Bruel) [Orabug
    38095087] {CVE-2025-38069}
    - wifiiwlwifi修复调试操作顺序 (Johannes Berg) [Orabug38094942] {CVE-2025-38045}
    - x86/mm检查 memblock_phys_alloc_range() 的返回值 (Philip Redkin) [Orabug: 38095101] {CVE-2025-38071}
    - libnvdimm/labels修复 nd_label_data_init() 中的除法错误 (Robert Richter) [Orabug: 38095109] {CVE-2025-38072}
    - spi-rockchip修复寄存器越界访问 (Luis de Arquer) [Orabug38095173] {CVE-2025-38081}
    - x86/fred修复启用 FRED 的 S4 恢复期间的系统挂起 (Xin Li) [Orabug: 38094951] {CVE-2025-38047}
    - block修复 set_blocksize 和读取路径之间的争用 (Darrick J. Wong) [Orabug38095117] {CVE-2025-38073}
    - virtio_ring通过将 event_triggered 标记为 KCSAN 的 racy修复数据争用 (Zhongqiu Han) [Orabug:
    38094958] {CVE-2025-38048}
    - scsitargetiscsi修复已删除连接的超时 (Dmitry Bogdanov) [Orabug38095134] {CVE-2025-38075}
    - usbtypecucsidisplayport修复死锁 (Andrei Kuchynski) [Orabug: 37977018] {CVE-2025-37967}
    - 蓝牙btnxpuart修复 FW 发布期间的内核错误 (Neeraj Sanjay Kale) [Orabug: 37844459] {CVE-2025-22102}
    - iiolight opt3001修复因并发标记访问导致的死锁 (Luca Ceresoli) [Orabug: 37977026] {CVE-2025-37968}
    - mm/page_alloc修复未接受内存处理中的争用条件 (Kirill A. Shutemov) [Orabug: 38094767] {CVE-2025-38008}
    - dmaengineidxd使用 idxd_cleanup() 帮助程序重构删除调用 (Shuai Xue) [Orabug38094790] {CVE-2025-38014}
    - dmaengineidxd修复 idxd_alloc 的错误处理路径中的内存泄漏 (Shuai Xue) [Orabug: 38094793] {CVE-2025-38015}
    - dmaenginetik3-udma添加缺失的锁定 (Ronald Wahl) [Orabug38094756] {CVE-2025-38005}
    - wifimt76在删除驱动程序时禁用 napi (Fedor Pchelkin) [Orabug38094770] {CVE-2025-38009}
    - phytegraxusb将位掩码用于 UTMI pad 电源状态跟踪 (Wane Chang) [Orabug: 38094777] {CVE-2025-38010}
    - drm/amdgpucsa unmap 使用不间断锁定 (Philip Yang) [Orabug: 38094779] {CVE-2025-38011}
    - HIDbpf中止调度如果设备遭到破坏 (Rongrong) [Orabug38094796] {CVE-2025-38016}
    - sched_extbpf_iter_scx_dsq_new() 应始终初始化迭代器 (Tejun Heo) [Orabug: 38094786] {CVE-2025-38012}
    - net/tls修复 alloc_page 失败时的内核错误 (Pengtao He) [Orabug: 38094802] {CVE-2025-38018}
    - mlxswspectrum_router修复删除 GRE 网络设备时的释放后使用 (Ido Schimmel) [Orabug
    38094804] {CVE-2025-38019}
    - wifimac80211分配 struct cfg80211_scan_request 后设置 n_channels (Kees Cook) [Orabug
    38094788] {CVE-2025-38013}
    - regulatormax20086修复无效的内存访问 (Cosmin Tanislav) [Orabug: 38094833] {CVE-2025-38027}
    - net/mlx5e禁用上行链路representor配置文件的 MACsec 卸载 (Carolina Jubran) [Orabug: 38094808] {CVE-2025-38020}
    - net_sched ->change() 期间也刷新 gso_skb 列表 (Cong Wang) [Orabug37998128] {CVE-2025-37992}
    - RDMA/core修复“KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in ib_register_device”问题 (Zhu Yanjun) [Orabug:
    38094813] {CVE-2025-38022}
    - nfs处理解锁路径中的 nfs_get_lock_context 失败 (Li Lingfeng) [Orabug38094818] {CVE-2025-38023}
    - HIDuclogic在 uclogic_input_configured() 中添加空检查 (Henry Martin) [Orabug: 38094764] {CVE-2025-38007}
    - RDMA/rxe修复 rxe_queue_cleanup 缺陷中的 slab-use-after-free 读取 (Zhu Yanjun) [Orabug: 38094827] {CVE-2025-38024}
    - arm64bpf仅缓解非特权用户加载的 cBPF 程序 (James Morse) [Orabug: 37977004] {CVE-2025-37963}
    - arm64bpf将 BHB 缓解添加到 cBPF 程序的尾声 (James Morse) [Orabug37976926] {CVE-2025-37948}
    - usbtypecucsidisplayport修复空指针访问 (Andrei Kuchynski) [Orabug: 38015126] {CVE-2025-37994}
    - 模块确保 kobject_put() 对于模块类型 kobjects 是安全的 (Dmitry Antipov) [Orabug: 38015131] {CVE-2025-37995}
    - memblock接受分配的内存然后在 memblock_double_array() 中使用 (Tom Lendacky) [Orabug:
    37976994] {CVE-2025-37960}
    - xenbus使用 kref 跟踪 req 生命周期 (Jason Andryuk) [Orabug: 37976934] {CVE-2025-37949}
    - smb 客户端通过租用中断避免 open_cached_dir 中发生争用 (Paul Aurich) [Orabug37976959] {CVE-2025-37954}
    - drm/amd/display修复 dml 帮助程序中的无效上下文错误 (Roman Li) [Orabug: 37977185] {CVE-2025-37965}
    - drm/v3d如果跳过重置则将作业添加至待定列表 (Maira Canal) [Orabug: 37976942] {CVE-2025-37951}
    - iioimu st_lsm6dsx修复 st_lsm6dsx_read_taged_fifo 中可能的锁定 (Silvano Seva) [Orabug:
    37977031] {CVE-2025-37969}
    - iioimust_lsm6dsx修复 st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo 中可能的锁定 (Silvano Seva) [Orabug: 37977037] {CVE-2025-37970}
    - KVMSVMSHUTDOWN 拦截时强制离开 SMM 模式 (Mikhail Lobanov) [Orabug37976977] {CVE-2025-37957}
    - mm/huge_memory修复取消引用无效的 pmd 迁移条目 (Gavin Guo) [Orabug37976982] {CVE-2025-37958}
    - x86/mm消除可能会无意间跳过 TLB 刷新的窗口 (Dave Hansen) [Orabug: 37977013] {CVE-2025-37964}
    - stagingbcm2835-camera初始化 v4l2_dev 中的 dev (Dave Stevenson) [Orabug: 37977042] {CVE-2025-37971}
    - Inputmtk-pmic-keys - 修复可能存在的空指针取消引用 (Gary Bisson) [Orabug37977044] {CVE-2025-37972}
    - bpfbpf_redirect_peer 上的清理数据包(Paul Chaignon) [Orabug37976990] {CVE-2025-37959}
    - netfilteripset修复哈希类型中的区域锁定 (Jozsef Kadlecsik) [Orabug38015141] {CVE-2025-37997}
    - ipvs修复 do_output_route4 中 saddr 的 uninit-value (Julian Anastasov) [Orabug: 37976996] {CVE-2025-37961}
    - canm_canm_can_class_allocate_dev()初始化设备探测上的旋转锁定 (Antonios Salios) [Orabug
    38015123] {CVE-2025-37993}
    - virtio-net在 virtnet_xsk_pool_enable() 中发生错误时释放 xsk_buffs (Jakub Kicinski) [Orabug: 37976969] {CVE-2025-37955}
    - sch_htb使 htb_deactivate() 幂等 (Cong Wang) [Orabug: 37977176] {CVE-2025-37953}
    - ksmbd修复 parse_lease_state() 中的内存泄漏 (Zhaolong Wang) [Orabug: 37977180] {CVE-2025-37962}
    - openvswitch修复 output_userspace() 中不安全的属性解析 (Eelco Chaudron) [Orabug38015148] {CVE-2025-37998}
    - ksmbd修复 __close_file_table_ids 中的 UAF (Sean Heelan) [Orabug: 37976951] {CVE-2025-37952}
    - ksmbd通过验证 *pos 防止越界流写入 (Norbert Szetei) [Orabug: 37976923] {CVE-2025-37947}
    - ksmbd防止使用空字符串重命名 (Namjae Jeon) [Orabug37976972] {CVE-2025-37956}
    - s390/pci当 PF 具有子 VF 时修复 disable_slot() 中的重复 pci_dev_put() (Niklas Schnelle) [Orabug
    37976920] {CVE-2025-37946}
    - wificfg80211修复多链接元素碎片整理期间的越界访问 (Veerendranath Jakkam) [Orabug: 37977046] {CVE-2025-37973}
    - s390/pci修复缺少检查的 zpci_create_device() 错误返回 (Niklas Schnelle) [Orabug: 37977050] {CVE-2025-37974}
    - fs/erofs/fileio调用 bio_add_folio() 之后调用 erofs_onlinefolio_split() (Max Kellermann) [Orabug
    38015155] {CVE-2025-37999}
    - mlxbf-bootctl在 secure_boot_fuse_state_show() 中使用 sysfs_emit_at() (David Thomson) [Orabug
    37964051,38037120] {CVE-2025-37866}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
252244	Oracle Linux 10 / 9Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2025-20530)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2025/8/19	2025/8/19	medium
216985	Debian dla-4076：linux-config-6.1 - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/3/1	2025/9/24	high
216984	Debian dla-4075：ata-modules-5.10.0-29-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/3/1	2025/4/10	critical
243840	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2025-21688	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/5	2025/8/5	medium
242347	Oracle Linux 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2025-20480)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2025/7/18	2025/7/19	medium

检测

插件搜索

medium

high

critical

medium

medium