远程 Ubuntu 25.04 主机上安装的程序包受到 USN-7594-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - ARM32 架构；

    - ARM64 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - RISC-V 架构；

    - User-Mode Linux (UML)；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 加密 API；

    - 计算加速框架；

    - ACPI 驱动程序；

    - 串行 ATA 和并行 ATA 驱动程序；

    - 驱动程序核心；

    - ublk userspace block 驱动程序；

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 总线设备；

    - TPM 设备驱动程序；

    - 时钟框架和驱动程序；

    - CPU 频率缩放框架；

    - 缓冲区共享和同步框架；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - HSI 子系统；

    - I2C 子系统；

    - I3C 子系统；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - IRQ 芯片驱动程序；

    - MCB 驱动程序；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - MemoryStick 子系统；

    - 多功能设备驱动程序；

    - Microchip PCI 驱动程序；

    - Intel 管理引擎接口驱动程序

    - PCI 端点测试驱动程序；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - 以太网绑定驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - STMicroelectronics 网络驱动程序；

    - NTB 驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - PCI 子系统；

    - Synopsys DesignWare PCIe PMU

    - Mellanox 平台驱动程序

    - PWM 驱动程序；

    - 远程处理器子系统；

    - S/390 驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - Samsung SoC 驱动程序；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - GPIB 驱动程序

    - VideoCore 服务驱动程序；

    - 热驱动程序；

    - TTY 驱动程序；

    - UFS 子系统；

    - Cadence USB3 驱动程序；

    - ChipIdea USB 驱动程序；

    - USB 设备类驱动程序；

    - DesignWare USB3 驱动程序；

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - USB 主机控制器驱动程序；

    - USB Type-C 支持驱动程序；

    - Virtio Host (VHOST) 子系统；

    - Backlight 驱动程序；

    - Framebuffer 层；

    - W1 Dallas 的 1-wire 总线驱动程序；

    - 9P 分布式文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ext4 文件系统；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - JFS 文件系统；

    - 网络文件系统库；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NTFS3 文件系统；

    - Overlay 文件系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - 以太网桥接；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - Perf 事件；

    - 内存管理；

    - UProbes 跟踪；

    - Amateur Radio 驱动程序；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - 网络套接字；

    - RDMA verbs API；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - Kernel fork() syscall；

    - 休眠控制

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - 监视队列通知机制；

    - 矢量 I/O 迭代器库

    - 802.1Q VLAN 协议；

    - 9P 文件系统网络协议；

    - 异步传输模式 (ATM) 子系统；

    - Networking 核心；

    - Distributed Switch 架构；

    - Ethtool 驱动程序；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - 管理组件传输协议 (MCTP)；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - Netfilter；

    - Open vSwitch；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - TLS 协议；

    - 无线网络；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - WCD 音频编解码器

    - SoC Audio for Freescale CPU 驱动程序；

    - SoC 音频通用驱动程序

    - Intel ASoC 驱动程序；

    - QCOM ASoC 驱动程序；

    - Virtio sound 驱动程序；

    - CPU电源监控子系统；(CVE-2025-37806, CVE-2025-22084, CVE-2025-39688, CVE-2025-22030, CVE-2025-37754, CVE-2025-37783, CVE-2025-37825, CVE-2025-37752, CVE-2025-22104, CVE-2025-40014, CVE-2025-22103, CVE-2025-37874, CVE-2025-37773, CVE-2025-37741, CVE-2025-37763, CVE-2025-37859, CVE-2025-37779, CVE-2025-23155, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37788, CVE-2025-22028, CVE-2024-58096, CVE-2025-37842, CVE-2025-37854, CVE-2025-38637, CVE-2024-58097, CVE-2023-53034, CVE-2025-37797, CVE-2025-37851, CVE-2025-37941, CVE-2025-37942, CVE-2025-37748, CVE-2025-37982, CVE-2025-22058, CVE-2025-37781, CVE-2025-23130, CVE-2025-23149, CVE-2025-23146, CVE-2025-37809, CVE-2025-37801, CVE-2025-22080, CVE-2025-23160, CVE-2025-37823, CVE-2025-37827, CVE-2025-39755, CVE-2025-22124, CVE-2025-22033, CVE-2025-22075, CVE-2025-37850, CVE-2025-37757, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-37979, CVE-2025-22098, CVE-2025-39989, CVE-2025-37989, CVE-2025-37790, CVE-2025-37885, CVE-2025-37875, CVE-2025-22066, CVE-2025-37975, CVE-2025-37819, CVE-2025-37755, CVE-2025-37794, CVE-2025-23148, CVE-2025-22067, CVE-2025-22061, CVE-2025-22109, CVE-2025-37884, CVE-2025-37852, CVE-2025-37866, CVE-2025-37872, CVE-2025-37751, CVE-2025-23156, CVE-2025-22065, CVE-2025-37837, CVE-2025-22069, CVE-2025-37822, CVE-2025-22128, CVE-2025-22087, CVE-2025-22023, CVE-2025-22038, CVE-2025-22096, CVE-2025-22076, CVE-2025-22045, CVE-2025-38049, CVE-2025-37870, CVE-2025-37939, CVE-2025-37865, CVE-2025-37860, CVE-2025-37771, CVE-2025-23144, CVE-2025-22081, CVE-2025-39778, CVE-2025-23153, CVE-2025-22036, CVE-2025-23154, CVE-2025-22101, CVE-2025-37808, CVE-2025-37772, CVE-2025-22070, CVE-2025-37789, CVE-2025-22025, CVE-2025-22019, CVE-2025-37868, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-23161, CVE-2025-22027, CVE-2025-37843, CVE-2025-37985, CVE-2025-23132, CVE-2025-22073, CVE-2025-37940, CVE-2025-23140, CVE-2025-37828, CVE-2025-22063, CVE-2025-22053, CVE-2025-37787, CVE-2025-23152, CVE-2025-37840, CVE-2025-22118, CVE-2025-37981, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22091, CVE-2025-37841, CVE-2025-23142, CVE-2025-37838, CVE-2025-37775, CVE-2025-23147, CVE-2025-22022, CVE-2025-37745, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37821, CVE-2025-37988, CVE-2025-37986, CVE-2025-23138, CVE-2025-37836, CVE-2025-37792, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-23159, CVE-2025-38240, CVE-2025-37764, CVE-2025-22120, CVE-2025-37881, CVE-2025-37777, CVE-2025-37987, CVE-2025-37811, CVE-2025-22032, CVE-2025-22044, CVE-2025-37943, CVE-2025-37802, CVE-2025-37829, CVE-2025-37862, CVE-2025-38575, CVE-2025-37799, CVE-2025-37882, CVE-2025-37812, CVE-2025-37765, CVE-2025-37813, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-37873, CVE-2025-37766, CVE-2025-37761, CVE-2025-37892, CVE-2025-22094, CVE-2025-22035, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22100, CVE-2025-37816, CVE-2025-22062, CVE-2025-22110, CVE-2025-22088, CVE-2025-23129, CVE-2025-38479, CVE-2025-37740, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-37846, CVE-2025-23163, CVE-2025-37977, CVE-2025-37879, CVE-2025-22082, CVE-2025-22046, CVE-2025-22050, CVE-2025-22126, CVE-2025-37796, CVE-2025-37815, CVE-2025-22127, CVE-2025-22105, CVE-2025-22068, CVE-2025-22119, CVE-2025-22089, CVE-2025-37858, CVE-2025-37826, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-23157, CVE-2025-22054, CVE-2025-37805, CVE-2025-37856, CVE-2025-37878, CVE-2025-37768, CVE-2025-22040, CVE-2025-37944, CVE-2025-37774, CVE-2025-22117, CVE-2025-37888, CVE-2025-37857, CVE-2025-37791, CVE-2025-37817, CVE-2025-22041, CVE-2025-37983, CVE-2025-22039, CVE-2025-37749, CVE-2025-22097, CVE-2025-37747, CVE-2025-37762, CVE-2025-22114, CVE-2025-37831, CVE-2025-23133, CVE-2025-22020, CVE-2025-22085, CVE-2025-37807, CVE-2025-22059, CVE-2025-22042, CVE-2025-22123, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-37759, CVE-2024-58094, CVE-2025-40114, CVE-2025-37810, CVE-2025-37833, CVE-2025-23134, CVE-2025-23151, CVE-2025-37743, CVE-2025-22034, CVE-2025-37739, CVE-2025-37863, CVE-2025-39735, CVE-2025-39930, CVE-2025-37847, CVE-2025-37803, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-22112, CVE-2025-37830, CVE-2025-22108, CVE-2025-37767, CVE-2025-37814, CVE-2025-37798, CVE-2025-22086, CVE-2025-37778, CVE-2024-58093, CVE-2025-37848, CVE-2025-22024, CVE-2025-37776, CVE-2025-38104, CVE-2025-37938, CVE-2025-37861, CVE-2025-23150, CVE-2025-22021, CVE-2025-22018, CVE-2025-23137, CVE-2025-37756, CVE-2025-37784, CVE-2025-37769, CVE-2025-37820, CVE-2025-37758, CVE-2025-22047, CVE-2025-37844, CVE-2025-22093, CVE-2025-23162, CVE-2025-22051, CVE-2025-22115, CVE-2025-37845, CVE-2025-22074, CVE-2025-37883, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-37824, CVE-2025-22052, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-37750, CVE-2025-39728, CVE-2025-23145, CVE-2025-22125, CVE-2025-37834, CVE-2025-37738, CVE-2025-37760, CVE-2025-22079, CVE-2025-37877, CVE-2025-37849, CVE-2025-22026, CVE-2025-37886, CVE-2025-22043, CVE-2025-22122, CVE-2025-37937, CVE-2025-22071, CVE-2025-37742, CVE-2025-37744, CVE-2025-22106, CVE-2025-38152, CVE-2025-37869, CVE-2025-23135, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2024-58095, CVE-2025-37853, CVE-2025-37770, CVE-2025-22031, CVE-2025-23158, CVE-2025-22072, CVE-2025-22102, CVE-2025-40325, CVE-2025-22037, CVE-2025-37876, CVE-2025-37864, CVE-2025-37867, CVE-2025-37855, CVE-2025-37984, CVE-2025-37839, CVE-2025-23131, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-22078, CVE-2025-37800, CVE-2025-37880, CVE-2025-37925, CVE-2025-22113, CVE-2025-22064, CVE-2025-22057, CVE-2025-22092, CVE-2025-37780, CVE-2025-37887, CVE-2025-22099, CVE-2025-37793, CVE-2025-37978, CVE-2025-37746)

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Rocky Linux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1783091784公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure ordering GCC12 appears to be much smarter about its dependency tracking and is aware that the relaxed variants are just normal loads and stores and this is causing problems like: [210.074549] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 210.079223] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enabcm6e4ei0 (bcmgenet):
    transmit queue 1 timed out [ 210.086717] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:529 dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.095044] Modules linked in: genet(E) nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat] [ 210.146561] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed for ss: 0. ret=-110 [ 210.146927] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 5.17.0-rc7G12+ #58 [ 210.153226] CPPC Cpufreq:cppc_scale_freq_workfn: failed to read perf counters [210.161349] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi Foundation Raspberry Pi 4 Model B/Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, BIOS EDK2-DEV 02/08/2022 [ 210.161353] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [210.161358] pc : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161364] lr : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161368] sp :
    ffff8000080a3a40 [ 210.161370] x29: ffff8000080a3a40 x28: ffffcd425af87000 x27: ffff8000080a3b20 [210.205150] x26: ffffcd425aa00000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffcd425af8ec08 [ 210.212321] x23:
    0000000000000100 x22: ffffcd425af87000 x21: ffff55b142688000 [ 210.219491] x20: 0000000000000001 x19:
    ffff55b1426884c8 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 210.226661] x17: 64656d6974203120 x16: 0000000000000001 x15:
    6d736e617274203a [ 210.233831] x14: 2974656e65676d63 x13: ffffcd4259c300d8 x12: ffffcd425b07d5f0 [210.241001] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: ffffcd425b07d5f0 x9 : ffffcd4258bdad9c [ 210.248171] x8 :
    00000000ffffdfff x7 : 000000000000003f x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 210.255341] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 :
    0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000001000 [ 210.262511] x2 : 0000000000001000 x1 : 0000000000000005 x0 :
    0000000000000044 [ 210.269682] Call trace: [ 210.272133] dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.275811] call_timer_fn+0x3c/0x15c [ 210.279489] __run_timers.part.0+0x288/0x310 [ 210.283777] run_timer_softirq+0x48/0x80 [ 210.287716] __do_softirq+0x128/0x360 [ 210.291392]
    __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x140 [ 210.295243] irq_exit_rcu+0x1c/0x30 [ 210.298745] el1_interrupt+0x38/0x54 [210.302334] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 [ 210.306445] el1h_64_irq+0x7c/0x80 [ 210.309857] arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x2c [ 210.313445] default_idle_call+0x4c/0x140 [ 210.317470] cpuidle_idle_call+0x14c/0x1a0 [ 210.321584] do_idle+0xb0/0x100 [ 210.324737] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x8c [210.328675] secondary_start_kernel+0xe4/0x110 [ 210.333138] __secondary_switched+0x94/0x98 The assumption when these were relaxed seems to be that device memory would be mapped non reordering, and that other constructs (spinlocks/etc) would provide the barriers to assure that packet data and in memory rings/queues were ordered with respect to device register reads/writes. This itself seems a bit sketchy, but the real problem with GCC12 is that it is moving the actual reads/writes around at will as though they were independent operations when in truth they are not, but the compiler can't know that. When looking at the assembly dumps for many of these routines its possible to see very clean, but not strictly in program order operations occurring as the compiler would be free to do if these weren't actually register reads/write operations. Its possible to suppress the timeout with a liberal bit of dma_mb()'s sprinkled around but the device still seems unable to reliably send/receive data. A better plan is to use the safer readl/writel everywhere. Since this partially reverts an older commit, which notes the use of the relaxed variants for performance reasons. I would suggest that any performance problems ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-49194)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：can: isotp: sanitize CAN ID checks in isotp_bind() Syzbot created an environment that lead to a state machine status that can not be reached with a compliant CAN ID address configuration. The provided address information consisted of CAN ID 0x6000001 and 0xC28001 which both boil down to 11 bit CAN IDs 0x001 in sending and receiving. Sanitize the SFF/EFF CAN ID values before performing the address checks. (CVE-2022-49269)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails. We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. It can be reproduced by: - smc_run nginx - smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000)
    - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue:
    smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP:
    0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08:
    ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2:
    0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ?
    __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ?
    __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ?
    __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK> During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2 and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work(). If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will be assigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignment errors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registration failure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. But the resources assigned to the connection won't be reset. When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process will be executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2, it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link in smcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points to correct SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 link mistakenly. Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx] will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the related MR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr:
    create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. v This patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigning link. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean the resources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation or registration. (CVE-2023-53382)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：RDMA/irdma: Cap MSIX used to online CPUs + 1 The irdma driver can use a maximum number of msix vectors equal to num_online_cpus() + 1 and the kernel warning stack below is shown if that number is exceeded. The kernel throws a warning as the driver tries to update the affinity hint with a CPU mask greater than the max CPU IDs. Fix this by capping the MSIX vectors to num_online_cpus() + 1. WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 23655 at include/linux/cpumask.h:106 irdma_cfg_ceq_vector+0x34c/0x3f0 [irdma] RIP: 0010:irdma_cfg_ceq_vector+0x34c/0x3f0 [irdma] Call Trace:
    irdma_rt_init_hw+0xa62/0x1290 [irdma] ? irdma_alloc_local_mac_entry+0x1a0/0x1a0 [irdma] ?
    __is_kernel_percpu_address+0x63/0x310 ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0xb0 ? irdma_lan_unregister_qset+0x280/0x280 [irdma] ? irdma_request_reset+0x80/0x80 [irdma] ? ice_get_qos_params+0x84/0x390 [ice] irdma_probe+0xa40/0xfc0 [irdma] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xd0/0xd0 ? irdma_remove+0x140/0x140 [irdma] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x62/0xe0 ? down_write+0x187/0x3d0 ? auxiliary_match_id+0xf0/0x1a0 ? irdma_remove+0x140/0x140 [irdma] auxiliary_bus_probe+0xa6/0x100
    __driver_probe_device+0x4a4/0xd50 ? __device_attach_driver+0x2c0/0x2c0 driver_probe_device+0x4a/0x110
    __driver_attach+0x1aa/0x350 bus_for_each_dev+0x11d/0x1b0 ? subsys_dev_iter_init+0xe0/0xe0 bus_add_driver+0x3b1/0x610 driver_register+0x18e/0x410 ? 0xffffffffc0b88000 irdma_init_module+0x50/0xaa [irdma] do_one_initcall+0x103/0x5f0 ? perf_trace_initcall_level+0x420/0x420 ? do_init_module+0x4e/0x700 ?
    __kasan_kmalloc+0x7d/0xa0 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x188/0x2b0 ? kasan_unpoison+0x21/0x50 do_init_module+0x1d1/0x700 load_module+0x3867/0x5260 ? layout_and_allocate+0x3990/0x3990 ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0xb0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x62/0xe0 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xd0/0xd0 ? __vmalloc_node_range+0x46b/0x890 ? lock_release+0x5c8/0xba0 ? alloc_vm_area+0x120/0x120 ? selinux_kernel_module_from_file+0x2a5/0x300 ? __inode_security_revalidate+0xf0/0xf0 ?
    __do_sys_init_module+0x1db/0x260 __do_sys_init_module+0x1db/0x260 ? load_module+0x5260/0x5260 ? do_syscall_64+0x22/0x450 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x450 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xdb (CVE-2023-53811)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：i2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference Baruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target only. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function always being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in __i2c_transfer. [wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions] (CVE-2024-35984)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: check error for register_netdev() on init Current init logic ignores the error code from register_netdev(), which will cause WARN_ON() on attempt to unregister it, if there was one, and there is no info for the user that the creation of the netdev failed. WARNING: CPU: 89 PID: 6902 at net/core/dev.c:11512 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x211/0x1a10 ... [ 3707.563641] unregister_netdev+0x1c/0x30 [3707.563656] idpf_vport_dealloc+0x5cf/0xce0 [idpf] [ 3707.563684] idpf_deinit_task+0xef/0x160 [idpf] [3707.563712] idpf_vc_core_deinit+0x84/0x320 [idpf] [ 3707.563739] idpf_remove+0xbf/0x780 [idpf] [3707.563769] pci_device_remove+0xab/0x1e0 [ 3707.563786] device_release_driver_internal+0x371/0x530 [3707.563803] driver_detach+0xbf/0x180 [ 3707.563816] bus_remove_driver+0x11b/0x2a0 [ 3707.563829] pci_unregister_driver+0x2a/0x250 Introduce an error check and log the vport number and error code. On removal make sure to check VPORT_REG_NETDEV flag prior to calling unregister and free on the netdev. Add local variables for idx, vport_config and netdev for readability. (CVE-2025-22116)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

远程 CentOS Linux 9 主机上安装的多个程序包受到 kernel-5.14.0-604.el9 版本变更日志中提及的多个漏洞影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: fix adapter NULL pointer dereference on reboot With SRIOV enabled, idpf ends up calling into idpf_remove() twice. First via idpf_shutdown() and then again when idpf_remove() calls into sriov_disable(), because the VF devices use the idpf driver, hence the same remove routine. When that happens, it is possible for the adapter to be NULL from the first call to idpf_remove(), leading to a NULL pointer dereference. echo 1 > /sys/class/net/<netif>/device/sriov_numvfs reboot BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
    0000000000000020 ... RIP: 0010:idpf_remove+0x22/0x1f0 [idpf] ... ? idpf_remove+0x22/0x1f0 [idpf] ? idpf_remove+0x1e4/0x1f0 [idpf] pci_device_remove+0x3f/0xb0 device_release_driver_internal+0x19f/0x200 pci_stop_bus_device+0x6d/0x90 pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x12/0x20 pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xbe/0x120 sriov_disable+0x34/0xe0 idpf_sriov_configure+0x58/0x140 [idpf] idpf_remove+0x1b9/0x1f0 [idpf] idpf_shutdown+0x12/0x30 [idpf] pci_device_shutdown+0x35/0x60 device_shutdown+0x156/0x200 ... Replace the direct idpf_remove() call in idpf_shutdown() with idpf_vc_core_deinit() and idpf_deinit_dflt_mbx(), which perform the bulk of the cleanup, such as stopping the init task, freeing IRQs, destroying the vports and freeing the mailbox. This avoids the calls to sriov_disable() in addition to a small netdev cleanup, and destroying workqueues, which don't seem to be required on shutdown. (CVE-2025-22065)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: convert workqueues to unbound When a workqueue is created with `WQ_UNBOUND`, its work items are served by special worker-pools, whose host workers are not bound to any specific CPU. In the default configuration (i.e. when `queue_delayed_work` and friends do not specify which CPU to run the work item on), `WQ_UNBOUND` allows the work item to be executed on any CPU in the same node of the CPU it was enqueued on. While this solution potentially sacrifices locality, it avoids contention with other processes that might dominate the CPU time of the processor the work item was scheduled on. This is not just a theoretical problem: in a particular scenario misconfigured process was hogging most of the time from CPU0, leaving less than 0.5% of its CPU time to the kworker. The IDPF workqueues that were using the kworker on CPU0 suffered large completion delays as a result, causing performance degradation, timeouts and eventual system crash. * I have also run a manual test to gauge the performance improvement. The test consists of an antagonist process (`./stress --cpu 2`) consuming as much of CPU 0 as possible. This process is run under `taskset 01` to bind it to CPU0, and its priority is changed with `chrt -pQ 9900 10000 ${pid}` and `renice -n -20 ${pid}` after start. Then, the IDPF driver is forced to prefer CPU0 by editing all calls to `queue_delayed_work`, `mod_delayed_work`, etc... to use CPU 0. Finally, `ktraces` for the workqueue events are collected. Without the current patch, the antagonist process can force arbitrary delays between `workqueue_queue_work` and `workqueue_execute_start`, that in my tests were as high as `30ms`. With the current patch applied, the workqueue can be migrated to another unloaded CPU in the same node, and, keeping everything else equal, the maximum delay I could see was `6us`. (CVE-2024-58057)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: fix checksums set in idpf_rx_rsc() idpf_rx_rsc() uses skb_transport_offset(skb) while the transport header is not set yet. This triggers the following warning for CONFIG_DEBUG_NET=y builds.
    DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) [ 69.261620] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:3020 idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (include/linux/skbuff.h:3020) idpf [ 69.261629] Modules linked in: vfat fat dummy bridge intel_uncore_frequency_tpmi intel_uncore_frequency_common intel_vsec_tpmi idpf intel_vsec cdc_ncm cdc_eem cdc_ether usbnet mii xhci_pci xhci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd libeth [ 69.261644] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Tainted: G S W 6.14.0-smp-DEV #1697 [ 69.261648] Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [W]=WARN [ 69.261650] RIP: 0010:idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (include/linux/skbuff.h:3020) idpf [ 69.261677] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:242 kernel/panic.c:748) [69.261682] ? idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (include/linux/skbuff.h:3020) idpf [ 69.261687] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:?) [ 69.261690] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:285) [ 69.261694] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:309) [ 69.261697] ? asm_exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621) [69.261700] ? __pfx_idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:4011) idpf [69.261704] ? idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (include/linux/skbuff.h:3020) idpf [ 69.261708] ? idpf_vport_splitq_napi_poll (drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c:3072) idpf [ 69.261712]
    __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:7194) [ 69.261716] net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:7265) [ 69.261718] ?
    __qdisc_run (net/sched/sch_generic.c:293) [ 69.261721] ? sched_clock (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:288) [ 69.261726] handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:561) (CVE-2025-21890)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: check error for register_netdev() on init Current init logic ignores the error code from register_netdev(), which will cause WARN_ON() on attempt to unregister it, if there was one, and there is no info for the user that the creation of the netdev failed. WARNING: CPU: 89 PID: 6902 at net/core/dev.c:11512 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x211/0x1a10 ... [ 3707.563641] unregister_netdev+0x1c/0x30 [3707.563656] idpf_vport_dealloc+0x5cf/0xce0 [idpf] [ 3707.563684] idpf_deinit_task+0xef/0x160 [idpf] [3707.563712] idpf_vc_core_deinit+0x84/0x320 [idpf] [ 3707.563739] idpf_remove+0xbf/0x780 [idpf] [3707.563769] pci_device_remove+0xab/0x1e0 [ 3707.563786] device_release_driver_internal+0x371/0x530 [3707.563803] driver_detach+0xbf/0x180 [ 3707.563816] bus_remove_driver+0x11b/0x2a0 [ 3707.563829] pci_unregister_driver+0x2a/0x250 Introduce an error check and log the vport number and error code. On removal make sure to check VPORT_REG_NETDEV flag prior to calling unregister and free on the netdev. Add local variables for idx, vport_config and netdev for readability. (CVE-2025-22116)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：idpf: fix null-ptr-deref in idpf_features_check idpf_features_check is used to validate the TX packet. skb header length is compared with the hardware supported value received from the device control plane. The value is stored in the adapter structure and to access it, vport pointer is used. During reset all the vports are released and the vport pointer that the netdev private structure points to is NULL. To avoid null-ptr-deref, store the max header length value in netdev private structure. This also helps to cache the value and avoid accessing adapter pointer in hot path. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000068 ...
    RIP: 0010:idpf_features_check+0x6d/0xe0 [idpf] Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x154/0x520 ? exc_page_fault+0x76/0x190 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? idpf_features_check+0x6d/0xe0 [idpf] netif_skb_features+0x88/0x310 validate_xmit_skb+0x2a/0x2b0 validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x70 sch_direct_xmit+0x19d/0x3a0 __dev_queue_xmit+0xb74/0xe70 ...
    (CVE-2025-38053)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

AlmaLinux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1783091784公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: bcmgenet: Use stronger register read/writes to assure ordering GCC12 appears to be much smarter about its dependency tracking and is aware that the relaxed variants are just normal loads and stores and this is causing problems like: [210.074549] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 210.079223] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enabcm6e4ei0 (bcmgenet):
    transmit queue 1 timed out [ 210.086717] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:529 dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.095044] Modules linked in: genet(E) nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat] [ 210.146561] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed for ss: 0. ret=-110 [ 210.146927] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 5.17.0-rc7G12+ #58 [ 210.153226] CPPC Cpufreq:cppc_scale_freq_workfn: failed to read perf counters [210.161349] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi Foundation Raspberry Pi 4 Model B/Raspberry Pi 4 Model B, BIOS EDK2-DEV 02/08/2022 [ 210.161353] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [210.161358] pc : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161364] lr : dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.161368] sp :
    ffff8000080a3a40 [ 210.161370] x29: ffff8000080a3a40 x28: ffffcd425af87000 x27: ffff8000080a3b20 [210.205150] x26: ffffcd425aa00000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffcd425af8ec08 [ 210.212321] x23:
    0000000000000100 x22: ffffcd425af87000 x21: ffff55b142688000 [ 210.219491] x20: 0000000000000001 x19:
    ffff55b1426884c8 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 210.226661] x17: 64656d6974203120 x16: 0000000000000001 x15:
    6d736e617274203a [ 210.233831] x14: 2974656e65676d63 x13: ffffcd4259c300d8 x12: ffffcd425b07d5f0 [210.241001] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: ffffcd425b07d5f0 x9 : ffffcd4258bdad9c [ 210.248171] x8 :
    00000000ffffdfff x7 : 000000000000003f x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 210.255341] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 :
    0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000001000 [ 210.262511] x2 : 0000000000001000 x1 : 0000000000000005 x0 :
    0000000000000044 [ 210.269682] Call trace: [ 210.272133] dev_watchdog+0x234/0x240 [ 210.275811] call_timer_fn+0x3c/0x15c [ 210.279489] __run_timers.part.0+0x288/0x310 [ 210.283777] run_timer_softirq+0x48/0x80 [ 210.287716] __do_softirq+0x128/0x360 [ 210.291392]
    __irq_exit_rcu+0x138/0x140 [ 210.295243] irq_exit_rcu+0x1c/0x30 [ 210.298745] el1_interrupt+0x38/0x54 [210.302334] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 [ 210.306445] el1h_64_irq+0x7c/0x80 [ 210.309857] arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x2c [ 210.313445] default_idle_call+0x4c/0x140 [ 210.317470] cpuidle_idle_call+0x14c/0x1a0 [ 210.321584] do_idle+0xb0/0x100 [ 210.324737] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x8c [210.328675] secondary_start_kernel+0xe4/0x110 [ 210.333138] __secondary_switched+0x94/0x98 The assumption when these were relaxed seems to be that device memory would be mapped non reordering, and that other constructs (spinlocks/etc) would provide the barriers to assure that packet data and in memory rings/queues were ordered with respect to device register reads/writes. This itself seems a bit sketchy, but the real problem with GCC12 is that it is moving the actual reads/writes around at will as though they were independent operations when in truth they are not, but the compiler can't know that. When looking at the assembly dumps for many of these routines its possible to see very clean, but not strictly in program order operations occurring as the compiler would be free to do if these weren't actually register reads/write operations. Its possible to suppress the timeout with a liberal bit of dma_mb()'s sprinkled around but the device still seems unable to reliably send/receive data. A better plan is to use the safer readl/writel everywhere. Since this partially reverts an older commit, which notes the use of the relaxed variants for performance reasons. I would suggest that any performance problems ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-49194)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：can: isotp: sanitize CAN ID checks in isotp_bind() Syzbot created an environment that lead to a state machine status that can not be reached with a compliant CAN ID address configuration. The provided address information consisted of CAN ID 0x6000001 and 0xC28001 which both boil down to 11 bit CAN IDs 0x001 in sending and receiving. Sanitize the SFF/EFF CAN ID values before performing the address checks. (CVE-2022-49269)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails. We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. It can be reproduced by: - smc_run nginx - smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000)
    - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue:
    smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP:
    0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08:
    ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2:
    0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ?
    __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ?
    __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ?
    __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK> During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2 and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work(). If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will be assigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignment errors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registration failure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. But the resources assigned to the connection won't be reset. When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process will be executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2, it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link in smcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points to correct SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 link mistakenly. Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx] will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the related MR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr:
    create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. v This patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigning link. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean the resources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation or registration. (CVE-2023-53382)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：RDMA/irdma: Cap MSIX used to online CPUs + 1 The irdma driver can use a maximum number of msix vectors equal to num_online_cpus() + 1 and the kernel warning stack below is shown if that number is exceeded. The kernel throws a warning as the driver tries to update the affinity hint with a CPU mask greater than the max CPU IDs. Fix this by capping the MSIX vectors to num_online_cpus() + 1. WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 23655 at include/linux/cpumask.h:106 irdma_cfg_ceq_vector+0x34c/0x3f0 [irdma] RIP: 0010:irdma_cfg_ceq_vector+0x34c/0x3f0 [irdma] Call Trace:
    irdma_rt_init_hw+0xa62/0x1290 [irdma] ? irdma_alloc_local_mac_entry+0x1a0/0x1a0 [irdma] ?
    __is_kernel_percpu_address+0x63/0x310 ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0xb0 ? irdma_lan_unregister_qset+0x280/0x280 [irdma] ? irdma_request_reset+0x80/0x80 [irdma] ? ice_get_qos_params+0x84/0x390 [ice] irdma_probe+0xa40/0xfc0 [irdma] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xd0/0xd0 ? irdma_remove+0x140/0x140 [irdma] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x62/0xe0 ? down_write+0x187/0x3d0 ? auxiliary_match_id+0xf0/0x1a0 ? irdma_remove+0x140/0x140 [irdma] auxiliary_bus_probe+0xa6/0x100
    __driver_probe_device+0x4a4/0xd50 ? __device_attach_driver+0x2c0/0x2c0 driver_probe_device+0x4a/0x110
    __driver_attach+0x1aa/0x350 bus_for_each_dev+0x11d/0x1b0 ? subsys_dev_iter_init+0xe0/0xe0 bus_add_driver+0x3b1/0x610 driver_register+0x18e/0x410 ? 0xffffffffc0b88000 irdma_init_module+0x50/0xaa [irdma] do_one_initcall+0x103/0x5f0 ? perf_trace_initcall_level+0x420/0x420 ? do_init_module+0x4e/0x700 ?
    __kasan_kmalloc+0x7d/0xa0 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x188/0x2b0 ? kasan_unpoison+0x21/0x50 do_init_module+0x1d1/0x700 load_module+0x3867/0x5260 ? layout_and_allocate+0x3990/0x3990 ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0xb0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x62/0xe0 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xd0/0xd0 ? __vmalloc_node_range+0x46b/0x890 ? lock_release+0x5c8/0xba0 ? alloc_vm_area+0x120/0x120 ? selinux_kernel_module_from_file+0x2a5/0x300 ? __inode_security_revalidate+0xf0/0xf0 ?
    __do_sys_init_module+0x1db/0x260 __do_sys_init_module+0x1db/0x260 ? load_module+0x5260/0x5260 ? do_syscall_64+0x22/0x450 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x450 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xdb (CVE-2023-53811)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：i2c: smbus: fix NULL function pointer dereference Baruch reported an OOPS when using the designware controller as target only. Target-only modes break the assumption of one transfer function always being available. Fix this by always checking the pointer in __i2c_transfer. [wsa: dropped the simplification in core-smbus to avoid theoretical regressions] (CVE-2024-35984)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Oracle Linux 10 / 9 主机上安装的多个程序包受到 ELSA-2026-50372 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    - net/sched：修复导致页面缓存损坏的 pedit 部分 COW(Rajat Gupta) {CVE-2026-46331}
    - eventpoll：修复ep_remove结构 eventpoll / 结构文件 UAF （Christian Brauner） [Orabug： 39668743] {CVE-2026-46242}
    - net：skbuff：修复pskb_carve帮助程序中缺少的 zerocopy 引用 （Minh Nguyen） [Orabug： 39656679] {CVE-2026-52943}
    - arm64：勘误表：缓解各种 Arm CPU 上的 TLBI 勘误表 （Mark Rutland） [Orabug： 39548792] {CVE-2025-10263}
    - openvswitch： vport：修复释放隧道端口时的自死锁 （Ilya Maximets） {CVE-2026-46165}
    - iommu/amd：在并发 TLB 无效的情况下序列化序列分配 （Ankit Soni） {CVE-2026-43220}
    - usb：ulpi：修复 ulpi_register（） 错误路径中的内存泄漏 （Felix Gu） {CVE-2026-46109}
    - smb：客户端：拒绝用户空间 cifs.spnego 描述 （Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada） [Orabug： 39463671] {CVE-2026-46243}
    - net：skbuff：通过 frag-transfer 帮助程序传播 shared-frag 标记 (Hyunwoo Kim) [Orabug:
    39368826,39441323] {CVE-2026-43503，CVE-2026-46300}
    - net：skbuff：在合并期间保留 shared-frag 标记(William Bowling) [Orabug: 39368826] {CVE-2026-46300}
    - netfilter：拒绝 nft_bitwise 中的零位移 (Kai Ma) [Orabug: 39452464] {CVE-2026-46101}
    - net：ipv6：修复 seg6 和 rpl lwtunnels 中使用的 NOREF dst （Andrea Mayer） [Orabug： 39452457] {CVE-2026-46099}
    - ALSA：caiaq：修复探usb_dev故障时的 refcount 泄漏 （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug： 39452739] {CVE-2026-46048}
    - ipv6：rpl：重新压缩的 SRH 增长时预留mac_len余量 （Greg Kroah-Hartman） [Orabug：39426003] {CVE-2026-43501}
    - ALSA：caiaq：修复错误路径中可能残留的ep1_in_urb （Takashi Iwai） [Orabug： 39452746] {CVE-2026-45992}
    - net: bonding：修复 bond_xmit_broadcast() 中的释放后使用(Xiang Mei) [Orabug: 39205989] {CVE-2026-31419}
    - crypto：authencesn - 拒绝实例创建期间的短 ahash 摘要 （Yucheng Lu） [Orabug： 39452231] {CVE-2026-46033}
    - spi：修复设备设置失败时的资源泄漏 （Johan Hovold） [Orabug： 39452400] {CVE-2026-46083}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制节点总数 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug：39452123] {CVE-2026-46003}
    - net：bridge：在 RCU 阅读器中使用稳定的 FDB dst 快照 （Zhengchuan Liang） [Orabug： 39452411] {CVE-2026-46086}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制查询的最大次数 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug: 39452207] {CVE-2026-46026}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制每个节点的最大服务器注册节点数量 (Manivannan Sadhasivam) [Orabug: 39410851] {CVE-2026-43491}
    - RDMA/mana_ib：禁用 RSS QP 破坏时的 RX 转向 （Long Li） [Orabug： 39452406] {CVE-2026-46084}
    - media：rc：igorplugusb：注意一致性规则 （Oliver Neukum） [Orabug：39452432] {CVE-2026-46091}
    - wifi：mwifiex：修复 mwifiex_adapter_cleanup（） 中的释放后使用 （Daniel Hodges） [Orabug： 39452343] {CVE-2026-46069}
    - thermal：core：修复热区域调控器清理问题 （Rafael J. Wysocki） [Orabug： 39452186] {CVE-2026-46021}
    - smb：客户端：在 cifsacl 中重写 DACL 之前对其进行全面验证 (Michael Bommarito) [Orabug:
    39300611] {CVE-2026-31709}
    - scsi：sd：修复 device_add（&disk_dev） 失败时缺少的 put_disk（） （Yang Xiuwei） [Orabug： 39452100] {CVE-2026-45997}
    - rtmutex：在 remove_waiter（） 中使用 waiter：：task 而不是当前的任务 （Keenan Dong） [Orabug: 39425998] {CVE-2026-43499}
    - ceph：反哈希时仅 d_add（） 负 dentry （Max Kellermann） [Orabug： 39452291] {CVE-2026-46052}
    - dm mirror：修复 create_dirty_log（） 中的整数溢出 （Junrui Luo） [Orabug： 39452196] {CVE-2026-46023}
    - Bluetooth：hci_event：修复 SSP 通行密钥处理程序中潜在的 UAF (Shuvam Pandey) [Orabug: 39452304] {CVE-2026-46056}
    - tcp：监听器迁移后调用 sk_data_ready（） （Zhenzhong Wu） [Orabug： 39452159] {CVE-2026-46015}
    - inotify：修复 fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked（） 失败时的监视计数泄漏 （Chia-Ming Chang） [Orabug：
    39452250] {CVE-2026-46040}
    - md/raid5：在访问日志元数据之前验证负载大小 （Junrui Luo） [Orabug： 39452349] {CVE-2026-46070}
    - md/raid5：修复 retry_aligned_read（） 中的软锁定 （Chia-Ming Chang） [Orabug： 39452287] {CVE-2026-46051}
    - ext4：修复 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all（） 中缺少的 brelse（） （Sohei Koyama） [Orabug： 39452269] {CVE-2026-46046}
    - ext4：修复 check_xattrs（） 中的边界检查以防止越界访问 （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug：
    39452442] {CVE-2026-46094}
    - io_uring/poll：修复唤醒争用中缺少 EOF 的 multishot recv （Jens Axboe） {CVE-2026-23473}
    - KVM：nSVM：如果未处理的 VMMCALL 未被 L1 拦截则引发 #UD （Kevin Cheng） [Orabug： 39452372] {CVE-2026-46076}
    - KVM：SVM：如果 EFER，则为 INVLPGA 注入 #UD。SVME=0 （Kevin Cheng） [Orabug： 39452394] {CVE-2026-46082}
    - KVM：nSVM：在 L2 的 VMRUN 之后将中断阴影同步到缓存的 vmcb12 （Yosry Ahmed） [Orabug： 39452061] {CVE-2026-45987}
    - xfs：修复 xfs_alloc_buftarg（） 中的一个资源泄漏 （Haoxiang Li） [Orabug： 39452131] {CVE-2026-46005}
    - libceph：防止 ceph_handle_auth_reply（） 中潜在的 null-ptr-deref （Raphael Zimmer） [Orabug：
    39452201] {CVE-2026-46024}
    - ipv4：icmp：使用 icmp_pointers 之前验证回复类型 （Ruide Cao） [Orabug： 39452243] {CVE-2026-46037}
    - RDMA/rxe：在 rxe_rcv 中 payload_size（） 前验证 pad 和 ICRC （Hkbinbin） [Orabug： 39452259] {CVE-2026-46043}
    - net：qrtr：ns：ctrl_cmd_bye（） 期间释放节点 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug： 39452246] {CVE-2026-46038}
    - rxrpc：修复 rxkad 加密未对齐处理 （David Howells） [Orabug： 39452728] {CVE-2026-46085}
    - ALSA：caiaq：正确处理探测错误 （Takashi Iwai） [Orabug：39452126] {CVE-2026-46004}
    - rbd：修复 device_add_disk（） 失败时的 null-ptr-deref （Dawei Feng） [Orabug： 39452385] {CVE-2026-46079}
    - md/raid10：通过检查操作和 nowait 请求修复死锁 （Josh Hunt） [Orabug： 39452284] {CVE-2026-46050}
    - jbd2：修复 jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke（） 中的死锁 （Zhang Yi） [Orabug： 39452318] {CVE-2026-46061}
    - erofs：修复尾随 dirents 的越界 nameoff 处理 （Gao Xiang） [Orabug： 39452380] {CVE-2026-46078}
    - ALSA：ctxfi：添加回退到 S/PDIF 的默认 RSR （Harin Lee） [Orabug： 39452280] {CVE-2026-46049}
    - ext2：拒绝 ext2_iget（） 中含零i_nlink和有效模式的 inode （Vasiliy Kovalev） [Orabug： 39452119] {CVE-2026-46002}
    - net：qrtr：ns：修复驱动程序 remove（） 中的释放后使用 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug： 39452274] {CVE-2026-46047}
    - net：strparser：修复 strp_abort_strp（） 中的skb_head泄漏 （Luxiao Xu） [Orabug： 39452468] {CVE-2026-46102}
    - ALSA：control：在 snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names（） 中的 strnlen（） 之前验证 buf_len （Ziqing Chen） [Orabug： 39452416] {CVE-2026-46088}
    - crypto： pcrypt - 修复MAY_BACKLOG请求的处理 （Herbert Xu） [Orabug： 39410863] {CVE-2026-43493}
    - wifi：rtw88：检查 PCI 上游桥是否存在 （Fedor Pchelkin） [Orabug： 39452437] {CVE-2026-46092}
    - zram：不忘记为部分丢弃请求执行 endio （Sergey Senozhatsky） [Orabug： 39452420] {CVE-2026-46089}
    - ocfs2：拆分 dio 完成中的事务以避免信用耗尽 （Heming Zhao） [Orabug： 39452388] {CVE-2026-46080}
    - drm/amdgpu：限制 BO 列表条目计数以防止资源耗尽 （Jesse Zhang） [Orabug： 39167551] {CVE-2026-23468}
    - padata：一劳永逸地修复 pd UAF （Herbert Xu） [Orabug： 38335055] {CVE-2025-38584}
    - drm/nouveau：修复 pushbuf 重定位边界检查中的 u32 溢出 （Greg Kroah-Hartman） [Orabug： 39452133] {CVE-2026-46006}
    - ALSA：usb-audio：停止以 MAX_NR_RATES 速率解析 UAC2 速率 （Cassio Gabriel） [Orabug： 39452170] {CVE-2026-46018}
    - drivers/xen/sys-hypervisor.c 中的缓冲区溢出 （Juergen Gross） [Orabug： 39305898] {CVE-2026-31786}
    - xen/privcmd：通过 VMA 拆分修复双重释放 （Juergen Gross） [Orabug： 39305908] {CVE-2026-31787}
    - rxrpc：修复非 XDR 密钥准备中缺失的票证长度验证 （Anderson Nascimento） [Orabug：
    39300563] {CVE-2026-31696}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 ID 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31697}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 PDH cert 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31698}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 CSR 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31699}
    - net/packet：修复 tpacket_snd（） 中的 mmap'd vnet_hdr 上的 TOCTOU 争用 （Bingquan Chen） {CVE-2026-31700}
    - ALSA：caiaq：在 create_card（） 中引用 USB 设备 （Berk Cem Goksel） [Orabug： 39300586] {CVE-2026-31701}
    - smb：客户端：修复smb2_ioctl_query_info QUERY_INFO路径中的 OOB 读取 （Michael Bommarito） [Orabug：
    39300607] {CVE-2026-31708}
    - smb：客户端：读取模式位之前需要完整 NFS 模式 SID （Michael Bommarito） [Orabug： 39343707] {CVE-2026-43350}
    - fuse：拒绝页面缓存中的超大问题 （Samuel Page） [Orabug： 39300556] {CVE-2026-31694}
    - mm/pagewalk：修复并发拆分和重错之间的争用 （Max Boone） [Orabug： 39250782] {CVE-2026-31456}
    - wifi：mac80211：ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb（） 失败时始终释放 skb （Felix Fietkau） [Orabug： 39167472] {CVE-2026-23444}
    - mm/userfaultfd：修复 hugetlb 错误互斥体哈希计算 （Jianhui Zhou） [Orabug： 39273453] {CVE-2026-31575}
    - ipv6：在 SRv6 路径中添加对 idev 的空检查 （Heminhong） [Orabug： 39167467] {CVE-2026-23442}
    - ocfs2：修复 ocfs2_write_end_inline 中的越界写入 （Joseph Qi） [Orabug： 39331090] {CVE-2026-43075}
    - ocfs2：在 inode 读取期间验证内联数据i_size （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug： 39331097] {CVE-2026-43076}
    - media：as102：修复在 as102_usb_probe（） 中注册设备后不释放内存 （Jeongjun Park） [Orabug： 39273467] {CVE-2026-31578}
    - bcache：修复 cached_dev.sb_bio 释放后使用和崩溃 （Mingzhe Zou） [Orabug： 39273481] {CVE-2026-31580}
    - ALSA：6fire：修复断开连接时的释放后使用 （Berk Cem Goksel） [Orabug： 39273486] {CVE-2026-31581}
    - media：em28xx：修复 em28xx_v4l2_open（） 中的释放后使用 （Abhishek Kumar） [Orabug： 39273493] {CVE-2026-31583}
    - mm：blk-cgroup：修复 cgwb_release_workfn（） 中的释放后使用 （Breno Leitao） [Orabug： 39273507] {CVE-2026-31586}
    - KVM：x86：使用 MMIO 片段中的擦除字段保存小写入值 （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug：
    39273521] {CVE-2026-31588}
    - x86-64：重命名名称令人误解的“__copy_user_nocache（）”函数 （Linus Torvalds） [Orabug： 39323162] {CVE-2026-43073}
    - kernel：谨慎处理 dup_mmap() 失败和 uprobe 注册 (Liam R. Howlett) {CVE-2025-21709}
    - gpiolib：修复 gdev->srcu 的争用条件 （Pawel Narewski） [Orabug： 38887677] {CVE-2026-22986}
    - KVM：SEV：终止对KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION大尺寸的警告 （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug：
    39273529] {CVE-2026-31590}
    - KVM：SEV：拒绝尝试同步已启动/加密的 vCPU 的 VMSA （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug： 39273553] {CVE-2026-31593}
    - ocfs2：处理 ocfs2_group_extend 中无效的 dinode （Zhengyuan Huang） [Orabug： 39273569] {CVE-2026-31596}
    - ocfs2：修复VM_FAULT_RETRY时 ocfs2_fault（） 中的释放后使用 （Tejas Bharambe） [Orabug： 39273578] {CVE-2026-31597}
    - ocfs2：修复 unlink 和 dio_end_io_write 之间可能的死锁 （Joseph Qi） [Orabug： 39273586] {CVE-2026-31598}
    - dcache：将存储段的最小数量限制为两个 （Zhihao Cheng） [Orabug： 39323133] {CVE-2026-43071}
    - ALSA：ctxfi：将 PTP 限制为单页 （Harin Lee） [Orabug：39273608] {CVE-2026-31602}
    - wifi：rtw88：修复探查故障时的设备泄漏 （Johan Hovold） [Orabug： 39273620] {CVE-2026-31604}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程的Debian 13主机安装了受多个漏洞影响的软件包，正如dsa-6238公告中提到的。

    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian 安全咨询 DSA-6238-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2026年4月30日 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux CVE ID：CVE-2024-14027 CVE-2025-21709 CVE-2025-22116 CVE-2025-22117 CVE-2025-38426 CVE-2025-38627 CVE-2025-39764 CVE-2025-40005 CVE-2025-40135 CVE-2025-40147 CVE-2025-40150 CVE-2025-40219 CVE-2025-68175 CVE-2025-68239 CVE-2025-68334 CVE-2025-68736 CVE-2025-71152 CVE-2025-71161 CVE-2025-71221 CVE-2025-71239 CVE-2025-71265 CVE-2025-71266 CVE-2025-71267 CVE-2025-71269 CVE-2026-22981 CVE-2026-22985 CVE-2026-22986 CVE-2026-22993 CVE-2026-23004 CVE-2026-23066 CVE-2026-23070 CVE-2026-23104 CVE-2026-23138 CVE-2026-23157 CVE-2026-23207 CVE-2026-23210 CVE-2026-23226 CVE-2026-23227 CVE-2026-23231 CVE-2026-23239 CVE-2026-23240 CVE-2026-23242 CVE-2026-23243 CVE-2026-23244 CVE-2026-23245 CVE-2026-23246 CVE-2026-23249 CVE-2026-23250 CVE-2026-23251 CVE-2026-23252 CVE-2026-23253 CVE-2026-23255 CVE-2026-23270 CVE-2026-23271 CVE-2026-23273 CVE-2026-23274 CVE-2026-23276 CVE-2026-23277 CVE-2026-23278 CVE-2026-23279 CVE-2026-23281 CVE-2026-23284 CVE-2026-23285 CVE-2026-23286 CVE-2026-23287 CVE-2026-23289 CVE-2026-23290 CVE-2026-23291 CVE-2026-23292 CVE-2026-23293 CVE-2026-23296 CVE-2026-23297 CVE-2026-23298 CVE-2026-23300 CVE-2026-23302 CVE-2026-23303 CVE-2026-23304 CVE-2026-23306 CVE-2026-23307 CVE-2026-23308 CVE-2026-23310 CVE-2026-23312 CVE-2026-23313 CVE-2026-23315 CVE-2026-23316 CVE-2026-23317 CVE-2026-23318 CVE-2026-23319 CVE-2026-23321 CVE-2026-23324 CVE-2026-23325 CVE-2026-23330 CVE-2026-23334 CVE-2026-23335 CVE-2026-23336 CVE-2026-23339 CVE-2026-23340 CVE-2026-23343 CVE-2026-23347 CVE-2026-23351 CVE-2026-23352 CVE-2026-23354 CVE-2026-23356 CVE-2026-23357 CVE-2026-23359 CVE-2026-23360 CVE-2026-23361 CVE-2026-23362 CVE-2026-23363 CVE-2026-23364 CVE-2026-23365 CVE-2026-23367 CVE-2026-23368 CVE-2026-23369 CVE-2026-23370 CVE-2026-23372 CVE-2026-23373 CVE-2026-23374 CVE-2026-23375 CVE-2026-23378 CVE-2026-23379 CVE-2026-23380 CVE-2026-23381 CVE-2026-23382 CVE-2026-23383 CVE-2026-23386 CVE-2026-23387 CVE-2026-23388 CVE-2026-23389 CVE-2026-23391 CVE-2026-23392 CVE-2026-23393 CVE-2026-23395 CVE-2026-23396 CVE-2026-23397 CVE-2026-23398 CVE-2026-23399 CVE-2026-23401 CVE-2026-23412 CVE-2026-23413 CVE-2026-23414 CVE-2026-23417 CVE-2026-23419 CVE-2026-23420 CVE-2026-23422 CVE-2026-23426 CVE-2026-23427 CVE-2026-23428 CVE-2026-23434 CVE-2026-23438 CVE-2026-23439 CVE-2026-23440 CVE-2026-23441 CVE-2026-23442 CVE-2026-23444 CVE-2026-23445 CVE-2026-23446 CVE-2026-23447 CVE-2026-23448 CVE-2026-23449 CVE-2026-23450 CVE-2026-23452 CVE-2026-23454 CVE-2026-23455 CVE-2026-23456 CVE-2026-23457 CVE-2026-23458 CVE-2026-23460 CVE-2026-23461 CVE-2026-23462 CVE-2026-23463 CVE-2026-23464 CVE-2026-23465 CVE-2026-23466 CVE-2026-23470 CVE-2026-23474 CVE-2026-23475 CVE-2026-31389 CVE-2026-31391 CVE-2026-31392 CVE-2026-31393 CVE-2026-31394 CVE-2026-31396 CVE-2026-31399 CVE-2026-31400 CVE-2026-31401 CVE-2026-31402 CVE-2026-31403 CVE-2026-31405 CVE-2026-31406 CVE-2026-31407 CVE-2026-31408 CVE-2026-31409 CVE-2026-31410 CVE-2026-31411 CVE-2026-31412 CVE-2026-31414 CVE-2026-31415 CVE-2026-31416 CVE-2026-31417 CVE-2026-31418 CVE-2026-31421 CVE-2026-31422 CVE-2026-31423 CVE-2026-31424 CVE-2026-31425 CVE-2026-31426 CVE-2026-31427 CVE-2026-31428 CVE-2026-31429 CVE-2026-31430 CVE-2026-31431 CVE-2026-31432 CVE-2026-31433 CVE-2026-31434 CVE-2026-31436 CVE-2026-31438 CVE-2026-31439 CVE-2026-31440 CVE-2026-31441 CVE-2026-31446 CVE-2026-31447 CVE-2026-31448 CVE-2026-31449 CVE-2026-31450 CVE-2026-31451 CVE-2026-31452 CVE-2026-31453 CVE-2026-31454 CVE-2026-31455 CVE-2026-31458 CVE-2026-31462 CVE-2026-31464 CVE-2026-31466 CVE-2026-31467 CVE-2026-31469 CVE-2026-31470 CVE-2026-31473 CVE-2026-31474 CVE-2026-31476 CVE-2026-31477 CVE-2026-31478 CVE-2026-31479 CVE-2026-31480 CVE-2026-31482 CVE-2026-31483 CVE-2026-31485 CVE-2026-31487 CVE-2026-31488 CVE-2026-31489 CVE-2026-31492 CVE-2026-31494 CVE-2026-31495 CVE-2026-31496 CVE-2026-31497 CVE-2026-31498 CVE-2026-31500 CVE-2026-31502 CVE-2026-31503 CVE-2026-31504 CVE-2026-31505 CVE-2026-31506 CVE-2026-31507 CVE-2026-31508 CVE-2026-31509 CVE-2026-31510 CVE-2026-31511 CVE-2026-31512 CVE-2026-31515 CVE-2026-31516 CVE-2026-31518 CVE-2026-31519 CVE-2026-31520 CVE-2026-31521 CVE-2026-31522 CVE-2026-31523 CVE-2026-31524 CVE-2026-31525 CVE-2026-31527 CVE-2026-31528 CVE-2026-31530 CVE-2026-31531 CVE-2026-31532 CVE-2026-31533 CVE-2026-31540 CVE-2026-31542 CVE-2026-31545 CVE-2026-31546 CVE-2026-31548 CVE-2026-31549 CVE-2026-31550 CVE-2026-31551 CVE-2026-31552 CVE-2026-31554 CVE-2026-31555 CVE-2026-31556 CVE-2026-31557 CVE-2026-31558 CVE-2026-31559 CVE-2026-31561 CVE-2026-31563 CVE-2026-31565 CVE-2026-31566 CVE-2026-31570 CVE-2026-31575 CVE-2026-31576 CVE-2026-31577 CVE-2026-31578 CVE-2026-31580 CVE-2026-31581 CVE-2026-31582 CVE-2026-31583 CVE-2026-31584 CVE-2026-31585 CVE-2026-31586 CVE-2026-31587 CVE-2026-31588 CVE-2026-31590 CVE-2026-31593 CVE-2026-31594 CVE-2026-31595 CVE-2026-31596 CVE-2026-31597 CVE-2026-31598 CVE-2026-31599 CVE-2026-31602 CVE-2026-31603 CVE-2026-31604 CVE-2026-31605 CVE-2026-31606 CVE-2026-31607 CVE-2026-31610 CVE-2026-31611 CVE-2026-31612 CVE-2026-31614 CVE-2026-31615 CVE-2026-31616 CVE-2026-31617 CVE-2026-31618 CVE-2026-31619 CVE-2026-31622 CVE-2026-31623 CVE-2026-31624 CVE-2026-31625 CVE-2026-31626 CVE-2026-31627 CVE-2026-31628 CVE-2026-31629 CVE-2026-31634 CVE-2026-31637 CVE-2026-31638 CVE-2026-31639 CVE-2026-31642 CVE-2026-31644 CVE-2026-31645 CVE-2026-31646 CVE-2026-31647 CVE-2026-31648 CVE-2026-31649 CVE-2026-31651 CVE-2026-31655 CVE-2026-31656 CVE-2026-31657 CVE-2026-31658 CVE-2026-31659 CVE-2026-31660 CVE-2026-31661 CVE-2026-31662 CVE-2026-31664 CVE-2026-31665 CVE-2026-31666 CVE-2026-31667 CVE-2026-31668 CVE-2026-31669 CVE-2026-31670 CVE-2026-31671 CVE-2026-31672 CVE-2026-31673 CVE-2026-31674 CVE-2026-31675 CVE-2026-31676 CVE-2026-31677 CVE-2026-31678 CVE-2026-31679 CVE-2026-31680 CVE-2026-31681 CVE-2026-31682 CVE-2026-31683 CVE-2026-31684 CVE-2026-31685 CVE-2026-31686 CVE-2026-31689 CVE-2026-31693 CVE-2026-31786 CVE-2026-31787 CVE-2026-31788

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于稳定发行版本 (trixie)，已在 6.12.85-1 版本中修复这些问题。

    建议您升级 linux 程序包。

    如需了解 linux 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有关 Debian 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://www.debian.org/security/

    邮件列表：debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
240657	Ubuntu 25.04：Linux 内核漏洞 (USN-7594-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2025/6/26	2026/1/6	high
360066	Rocky Linux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1783091784）	Nessus	Rocky Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/18	medium
247702	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2025-22116	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/10	2026/8/21	medium
249174	CentOS 9：kernel-5.14.0-604.el9	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2025/8/12	2025/9/24	medium
360243	AlmaLinux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1783091784）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/18	medium
325292	Oracle Linux 10 / 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2026-50372)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/7/6	2026/7/8	high
340680	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS / Pro Realtime 24.04 LTS：Linux 内核（Raspberry Pi）漏洞（USN-8665-1）	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/8/26	2026/8/27	high
311299	Debian dsa-6238 ： ata-modules-6.12.74+deb13+1-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/4/30	2026/5/8	high

检测

插件搜索

high

medium

medium

medium

medium

high

high

high