Rocky Linux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：2026：1780562693公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 在低于 5.16.12 版本的 Linux 内核中发现一个问题。drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c 允许攻击者通过设备中构建的帧长度从堆内存获取敏感信息。(CVE-2022-26966)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：kprobes: don't call disarm_kprobe() for disabled kprobes The assumption in __disable_kprobe() is wrong, and it could try to disarm an already disarmed kprobe and fire the WARN_ONCE() below. [0] We can easily reproduce this issue. 1. Write 0 to /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled. # echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled 2. Run execsnoop. At this time, one kprobe is disabled. # /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop & [1] 2460 PCOMM PID PPID RET ARGS # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list ffffffff91345650 r __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [FTRACE] ffffffff91345650 k
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [DISABLED][FTRACE] 3. Write 1 to /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled, which changes kprobes_all_disarmed to false but does not arm the disabled kprobe. # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list ffffffff91345650 r
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [FTRACE] ffffffff91345650 k __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [DISABLED][FTRACE] 4. Kill execsnoop, when __disable_kprobe() calls disarm_kprobe() for the disabled kprobe and hits the WARN_ONCE() in __disarm_kprobe_ftrace(). # fg /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop ^C Actually, WARN_ONCE() is fired twice, and __unregister_kprobe_top() misses some cleanups and leaves the aggregated kprobe in the hash table.
    Then, __unregister_trace_kprobe() initialises tk->rp.kp.list and creates an infinite loop like this.
    aggregated kprobe.list -> kprobe.list -. ^ | '.__.' In this situation, these commands fall into the infinite loop and result in RCU stall or soft lockup. cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list :
    show_kprobe_addr() enters into the infinite loop with RCU. /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop :
    warn_kprobe_rereg() holds kprobe_mutex, and __get_valid_kprobe() is stuck in the loop. To avoid the issue, make sure we don't call disarm_kprobe() for disabled kprobes. [0] Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0/0x40 (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2460 at kernel/kprobes.c:1130
    __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.19 (kernel/kprobes.c:1129) Modules linked in: ena CPU: 6 PID: 2460 Comm:
    execsnoop Not tainted 5.19.0+ #28 Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c5.2xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017 RIP:
    0010:__disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.19 (kernel/kprobes.c:1129) Code: 24 8b 02 eb c1 80 3d c4 83 f2 01 00 75 d4 48 8b 75 00 89 c2 48 c7 c7 90 fa 0f 92 89 04 24 c6 05 ab 83 01 e8 e4 94 f0 ff <0f> 0b 8b 04 24 eb b1 89 c6 48 c7 c7 60 fa 0f 92 89 04 24 e8 cc 94 RSP: 0018:ffff9e6ec154bd98 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX:
    0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff930f7b00 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff921461c5 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff89c504286da8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000fffeffff R10:
    0000000000000000 R11: ffff9e6ec154bc28 R12: ffff89c502394e40 R13: ffff89c502394c00 R14: ffff9e6ec154bc00 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fe800398740(0000) GS:ffff89c812d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000c00057f010 CR3: 0000000103b54006 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
    00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> __disable_kprobe (kernel/kprobes.c:1716) disable_kprobe (kernel/kprobes.c:2392) __disable_trace_kprobe (kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:340) disable_trace_kprobe (kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:429) perf_trace_event_unreg.isra.2 (./include/linux/tracepoint.h:93 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:168) perf_kprobe_destroy (kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:295) _free_event (kernel/events/core.c:4971) perf_event_release_kernel (kernel/events/core.c:5176) perf_release (kernel/events/core.c:5186) __fput (fs/file_table.c:321) task_work_run (./include/linux/ ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-50008)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing/hist: Fix out-of-bound write on 'action_data.var_ref_idx' When generate a synthetic event with many params and then create a trace action for it [1], kernel panic happened [2]. It is because that in trace_action_create() 'data->n_params' is up to SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX (current value is 64), and array 'data->var_ref_idx' keeps indices into array 'hist_data->var_refs' for each synthetic event param, but the length of 'data->var_ref_idx' is TRACING_MAP_VARS_MAX (current value is 16), so out-of-bound write happened when 'data->n_params' more than 16. In this case, 'data->match_data.event' is overwritten and eventually cause the panic. To solve the issue, adjust the length of 'data->var_ref_idx' to be SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX and add sanity checks to avoid out-of-bound write. [1] # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # echo my_synth_event int v1; int v2; int v3; int v4; int v5; int v6;\ int v7; int v8; int v9; int v10; int v11; int v12; int v13; int v14;\ int v15; int v16; int v17; int v18; int v19; int v20; int v21; int v22;\ int v23; int v24; int v25; int v26; int v27; int v28;
    int v29; int v30;\ int v31; int v32; int v33; int v34; int v35; int v36; int v37; int v38;\ int v39; int v40; int v41; int v42; int v43; int v44; int v45; int v46;\ int v47; int v48; int v49; int v50; int v51;
    int v52; int v53; int v54;\ int v55; int v56; int v57; int v58; int v59; int v60; int v61; int v62;\ int v63 >> synthetic_events # echo 'hist:keys=pid:ts0=common_timestamp.usecs if comm==bash' >> \ events/sched/sched_waking/trigger # echo hist:keys=next_pid:onmatch(sched.sched_waking).my_synth_event(\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid) >> events/sched/sched_switch/trigger [2] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff91c900000000 PGD 61001067 P4D 61001067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU:
    2 PID: 322 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.1.0-rc8+ #229 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:strcmp+0xc/0x30 Code: 75 f7 31 d2 44 0f b6 04 16 44 88 04 11 48 83 c2 01 45 84 c0 75 ee c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 00 31 c0 eb 08 48 83 c0 01 84 d2 74 13 <0f> b6 14 07 3a 14 06 74 ef 19 c0 83 c8 01 c3 cc cc cc cc 31 c3 RSP: 0018:ffff9b3b00f53c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffba958a68 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffff91c943d33a90 RDI: ffff91c900000000 RBP: ffff91c900000000 R08: 00000018d604b529 R09:
    0000000000000000 R10: ffff91c9483eddb1 R11: ffff91ca483eddab R12: ffff91c946171580 R13: ffff91c9479f0538 R14: ffff91c9457c2848 R15: ffff91c9479f0538 FS: 00007f1d1cfbe740(0000) GS:ffff91c9bdc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff91c900000000 CR3:
    0000000006316000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_event_file+0x55/0x90 action_create+0x76c/0x1060 event_hist_trigger_parse+0x146d/0x2060 ? event_trigger_write+0x31/0xd0 trigger_process_regex+0xbb/0x110 event_trigger_write+0x6b/0xd0 vfs_write+0xc8/0x3e0 ? alloc_fd+0xc0/0x160 ? preempt_count_add+0x4d/0xa0 ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f1d1d0cf077 Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 RSP: 002b:00007ffcebb0e568 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
    0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000143 RCX: 00007f1d1d0cf077 RDX: 0000000000000143 RSI: 00005639265aa7e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00005639265aa7e0 R08: 000000000000000a R09:
    0000000000000142 R ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-50553)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts(). Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 & while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done (CVE-2023-52887)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the commit ac0a230f719b (eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the .ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver, so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed. (CVE-2024-38553)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - netusbcdc_ncm将 ndpoffset 添加到 NDP16 nframes 边界检查 cdc_ncm_rx_verify_ndp16() 验证 NDP 标头及其 DPE 条目是否适合 skb。第一个检查正确解释了 ndpoffset
    if ((ndpoffset + sizeof(struct usb_cdc_ncm_ndp16)) > skb_in->len) 但第二个检查将其忽略 if ((sizeof(struct usb_cdc_ncm_ndp16) + ret * (sizeof(struct usb_cdc_ncm_dpe16))) > skb_in->len) 此对照 skb 总长度验证 DPE 数组大小好像 NDP 位于偏移 0 处而不是 ndpoffset 处一样。将 NDP 放置在 NTB 末尾附近时大 wNdpIndex即使检查通过DPE 条目也可能延伸超过 skb 数据缓冲区。之后cdc_ncm_rx_fixup() 会在迭代 DPE 数组时读取越界内存。将 ndpoffset 添加到 nframes 边界检查并使用 struct_size_t() 以更清楚地表达 NDP-plus-DPE-array 大小。 (CVE-2026-23448)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

远程的Debian 13主机安装了受多个漏洞影响的软件包，正如dsa-6238公告中提到的。

    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian 安全咨询 DSA-6238-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2026年4月30日 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux CVE ID：CVE-2024-14027 CVE-2025-21709 CVE-2025-22116 CVE-2025-22117 CVE-2025-38426 CVE-2025-38627 CVE-2025-39764 CVE-2025-40005 CVE-2025-40135 CVE-2025-40147 CVE-2025-40150 CVE-2025-40219 CVE-2025-68175 CVE-2025-68239 CVE-2025-68334 CVE-2025-68736 CVE-2025-71152 CVE-2025-71161 CVE-2025-71221 CVE-2025-71239 CVE-2025-71265 CVE-2025-71266 CVE-2025-71267 CVE-2025-71269 CVE-2026-22981 CVE-2026-22985 CVE-2026-22986 CVE-2026-22993 CVE-2026-23004 CVE-2026-23066 CVE-2026-23070 CVE-2026-23104 CVE-2026-23138 CVE-2026-23157 CVE-2026-23207 CVE-2026-23210 CVE-2026-23226 CVE-2026-23227 CVE-2026-23231 CVE-2026-23239 CVE-2026-23240 CVE-2026-23242 CVE-2026-23243 CVE-2026-23244 CVE-2026-23245 CVE-2026-23246 CVE-2026-23249 CVE-2026-23250 CVE-2026-23251 CVE-2026-23252 CVE-2026-23253 CVE-2026-23255 CVE-2026-23270 CVE-2026-23271 CVE-2026-23273 CVE-2026-23274 CVE-2026-23276 CVE-2026-23277 CVE-2026-23278 CVE-2026-23279 CVE-2026-23281 CVE-2026-23284 CVE-2026-23285 CVE-2026-23286 CVE-2026-23287 CVE-2026-23289 CVE-2026-23290 CVE-2026-23291 CVE-2026-23292 CVE-2026-23293 CVE-2026-23296 CVE-2026-23297 CVE-2026-23298 CVE-2026-23300 CVE-2026-23302 CVE-2026-23303 CVE-2026-23304 CVE-2026-23306 CVE-2026-23307 CVE-2026-23308 CVE-2026-23310 CVE-2026-23312 CVE-2026-23313 CVE-2026-23315 CVE-2026-23316 CVE-2026-23317 CVE-2026-23318 CVE-2026-23319 CVE-2026-23321 CVE-2026-23324 CVE-2026-23325 CVE-2026-23330 CVE-2026-23334 CVE-2026-23335 CVE-2026-23336 CVE-2026-23339 CVE-2026-23340 CVE-2026-23343 CVE-2026-23347 CVE-2026-23351 CVE-2026-23352 CVE-2026-23354 CVE-2026-23356 CVE-2026-23357 CVE-2026-23359 CVE-2026-23360 CVE-2026-23361 CVE-2026-23362 CVE-2026-23363 CVE-2026-23364 CVE-2026-23365 CVE-2026-23367 CVE-2026-23368 CVE-2026-23369 CVE-2026-23370 CVE-2026-23372 CVE-2026-23373 CVE-2026-23374 CVE-2026-23375 CVE-2026-23378 CVE-2026-23379 CVE-2026-23380 CVE-2026-23381 CVE-2026-23382 CVE-2026-23383 CVE-2026-23386 CVE-2026-23387 CVE-2026-23388 CVE-2026-23389 CVE-2026-23391 CVE-2026-23392 CVE-2026-23393 CVE-2026-23395 CVE-2026-23396 CVE-2026-23397 CVE-2026-23398 CVE-2026-23399 CVE-2026-23401 CVE-2026-23412 CVE-2026-23413 CVE-2026-23414 CVE-2026-23417 CVE-2026-23419 CVE-2026-23420 CVE-2026-23422 CVE-2026-23426 CVE-2026-23427 CVE-2026-23428 CVE-2026-23434 CVE-2026-23438 CVE-2026-23439 CVE-2026-23440 CVE-2026-23441 CVE-2026-23442 CVE-2026-23444 CVE-2026-23445 CVE-2026-23446 CVE-2026-23447 CVE-2026-23448 CVE-2026-23449 CVE-2026-23450 CVE-2026-23452 CVE-2026-23454 CVE-2026-23455 CVE-2026-23456 CVE-2026-23457 CVE-2026-23458 CVE-2026-23460 CVE-2026-23461 CVE-2026-23462 CVE-2026-23463 CVE-2026-23464 CVE-2026-23465 CVE-2026-23466 CVE-2026-23470 CVE-2026-23474 CVE-2026-23475 CVE-2026-31389 CVE-2026-31391 CVE-2026-31392 CVE-2026-31393 CVE-2026-31394 CVE-2026-31396 CVE-2026-31399 CVE-2026-31400 CVE-2026-31401 CVE-2026-31402 CVE-2026-31403 CVE-2026-31405 CVE-2026-31406 CVE-2026-31407 CVE-2026-31408 CVE-2026-31409 CVE-2026-31410 CVE-2026-31411 CVE-2026-31412 CVE-2026-31414 CVE-2026-31415 CVE-2026-31416 CVE-2026-31417 CVE-2026-31418 CVE-2026-31421 CVE-2026-31422 CVE-2026-31423 CVE-2026-31424 CVE-2026-31425 CVE-2026-31426 CVE-2026-31427 CVE-2026-31428 CVE-2026-31429 CVE-2026-31430 CVE-2026-31431 CVE-2026-31432 CVE-2026-31433 CVE-2026-31434 CVE-2026-31436 CVE-2026-31438 CVE-2026-31439 CVE-2026-31440 CVE-2026-31441 CVE-2026-31446 CVE-2026-31447 CVE-2026-31448 CVE-2026-31449 CVE-2026-31450 CVE-2026-31451 CVE-2026-31452 CVE-2026-31453 CVE-2026-31454 CVE-2026-31455 CVE-2026-31458 CVE-2026-31462 CVE-2026-31464 CVE-2026-31466 CVE-2026-31467 CVE-2026-31469 CVE-2026-31470 CVE-2026-31473 CVE-2026-31474 CVE-2026-31476 CVE-2026-31477 CVE-2026-31478 CVE-2026-31479 CVE-2026-31480 CVE-2026-31482 CVE-2026-31483 CVE-2026-31485 CVE-2026-31487 CVE-2026-31488 CVE-2026-31489 CVE-2026-31492 CVE-2026-31494 CVE-2026-31495 CVE-2026-31496 CVE-2026-31497 CVE-2026-31498 CVE-2026-31500 CVE-2026-31502 CVE-2026-31503 CVE-2026-31504 CVE-2026-31505 CVE-2026-31506 CVE-2026-31507 CVE-2026-31508 CVE-2026-31509 CVE-2026-31510 CVE-2026-31511 CVE-2026-31512 CVE-2026-31515 CVE-2026-31516 CVE-2026-31518 CVE-2026-31519 CVE-2026-31520 CVE-2026-31521 CVE-2026-31522 CVE-2026-31523 CVE-2026-31524 CVE-2026-31525 CVE-2026-31527 CVE-2026-31528 CVE-2026-31530 CVE-2026-31531 CVE-2026-31532 CVE-2026-31533 CVE-2026-31540 CVE-2026-31542 CVE-2026-31545 CVE-2026-31546 CVE-2026-31548 CVE-2026-31549 CVE-2026-31550 CVE-2026-31551 CVE-2026-31552 CVE-2026-31554 CVE-2026-31555 CVE-2026-31556 CVE-2026-31557 CVE-2026-31558 CVE-2026-31559 CVE-2026-31561 CVE-2026-31563 CVE-2026-31565 CVE-2026-31566 CVE-2026-31570 CVE-2026-31575 CVE-2026-31576 CVE-2026-31577 CVE-2026-31578 CVE-2026-31580 CVE-2026-31581 CVE-2026-31582 CVE-2026-31583 CVE-2026-31584 CVE-2026-31585 CVE-2026-31586 CVE-2026-31587 CVE-2026-31588 CVE-2026-31590 CVE-2026-31593 CVE-2026-31594 CVE-2026-31595 CVE-2026-31596 CVE-2026-31597 CVE-2026-31598 CVE-2026-31599 CVE-2026-31602 CVE-2026-31603 CVE-2026-31604 CVE-2026-31605 CVE-2026-31606 CVE-2026-31607 CVE-2026-31610 CVE-2026-31611 CVE-2026-31612 CVE-2026-31614 CVE-2026-31615 CVE-2026-31616 CVE-2026-31617 CVE-2026-31618 CVE-2026-31619 CVE-2026-31622 CVE-2026-31623 CVE-2026-31624 CVE-2026-31625 CVE-2026-31626 CVE-2026-31627 CVE-2026-31628 CVE-2026-31629 CVE-2026-31634 CVE-2026-31637 CVE-2026-31638 CVE-2026-31639 CVE-2026-31642 CVE-2026-31644 CVE-2026-31645 CVE-2026-31646 CVE-2026-31647 CVE-2026-31648 CVE-2026-31649 CVE-2026-31651 CVE-2026-31655 CVE-2026-31656 CVE-2026-31657 CVE-2026-31658 CVE-2026-31659 CVE-2026-31660 CVE-2026-31661 CVE-2026-31662 CVE-2026-31664 CVE-2026-31665 CVE-2026-31666 CVE-2026-31667 CVE-2026-31668 CVE-2026-31669 CVE-2026-31670 CVE-2026-31671 CVE-2026-31672 CVE-2026-31673 CVE-2026-31674 CVE-2026-31675 CVE-2026-31676 CVE-2026-31677 CVE-2026-31678 CVE-2026-31679 CVE-2026-31680 CVE-2026-31681 CVE-2026-31682 CVE-2026-31683 CVE-2026-31684 CVE-2026-31685 CVE-2026-31686 CVE-2026-31689 CVE-2026-31693 CVE-2026-31786 CVE-2026-31787 CVE-2026-31788

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于稳定发行版本 (trixie)，已在 6.12.85-1 版本中修复这些问题。

    建议您升级 linux 程序包。

    如需了解 linux 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有关 Debian 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://www.debian.org/security/

    邮件列表：debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

AlmaLinux 9.2 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1782151303公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：netfilter: ebtables: fix memory leak when blob is malformed The bug fix was incomplete, it replaced crash with a memory leak. The old code had an assignment to ret embedded into the conditional, restore this. (CVE-2022-48641)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：thermal/int340x_thermal: handle data_vault when the value is ZERO_SIZE_PTR In some case, the GDDV returns a package with a buffer which has zero length. It causes that kmemdup() returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10). Then the data_vault_read() got NULL point dereference problem when accessing the 0x10 value in data_vault. [ 71.024560] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 This patch uses ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() for checking ZERO_SIZE_PTR or NULL value in data_vault. (CVE-2022-48703)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：ice: switch: fix potential memleak in ice_add_adv_recipe() When ice_add_special_words() fails, the 'rm' is not released, which will lead to a memory leak. Fix this up by going to 'err_unroll' label. Compile tested only. (CVE-2022-48709)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：xen-netfront: Fix NULL sring after live migration A NAPI is setup for each network sring to poll data to kernel The sring with source host is destroyed before live migration and new sring with target host is setup after live migration. The NAPI for the old sring is not deleted until setup new sring with target host after migration. With busy_poll/busy_read enabled, the NAPI can be polled before got deleted when resume VM. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 IP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops:
    0000 [#1] SMP PTI Call Trace: finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 timerqueue_del+0x1d/0x40 hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0xb5/0x110 xennet_alloc_rx_buffers+0x2a0/0x2a0 napi_busy_loop+0xdb/0x270 sock_poll+0x87/0x90 do_sys_poll+0x26f/0x580 tracing_map_insert+0x1d4/0x2f0 event_hist_trigger+0x14a/0x260 finish_task_switch+0x71/0x230 __schedule+0x256/0x890 recalc_sigpending+0x1b/0x50 xen_sched_clock+0x15/0x20
    __rb_reserve_next+0x12d/0x140 ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x123/0x3d0 event_triggers_call+0x87/0xb0 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x1c4/0x210 xen_clocksource_get_cycles+0x15/0x20 ktime_get_ts64+0x51/0xf0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 SyS_ppoll+0x160/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x73/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x41/0xa6 ... RIP: xennet_poll+0xae/0xd20 RSP: ffffb4f041933900 CR2:
    0000000000000008 ---[ end trace f8601785b354351c ]--- xen frontend should remove the NAPIs for the old srings before live migration as the bond srings are destroyed There is a tiny window between the srings are set to NULL and the NAPIs are disabled, It is safe as the NAPI threads are still frozen at that time (CVE-2022-48969)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：cifs: fix small mempool leak in SMB2_negotiate() In some cases of failure (dialect mismatches) in SMB2_negotiate(), after the request is sent, the checks would return -EIO when they should be rather setting rc = -EIO and jumping to neg_exit to free the response buffer from mempool. (CVE-2022-49938)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

CentOS Linux 8.4 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare CENTOS8.4：CLSA-2026：2026：1782145985公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - Linux 内核 CIFS 实现版本 4.9.0 容易受到目录条目列表中相对路径注入的影响。(CVE-2019-10220)

  - 在 Linux 内核 5.3.2 及其之前版本的 drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c 的 write_tpt_entry 中发现问题。cxgb4 驱动程序直接从堆栈变量中调用 dma_map_single（DMA 函数）。
    攻击者可利用此问题触发拒绝服务，如果在此堆栈/DMA 交互具有安全相关性的架构上使用此驱动程序，该漏洞可遭恶意利用。(CVE-2019-17075)

  - Linux 内核 4.20.5 及其之前版本的 KVM 实现中存在释放后使用。(CVE-2019-7221)

  - 此漏洞允许本地攻击者提升对 Linux 内核 5.14-rc3 的受影响装置的特权。要利用此漏洞，攻击者必须首先具备在目标系统上执行低权限代码的能力。处理 eBPF 程序时存在特定缺陷。造成此问题的原因是缺少对用户提供的 eBPF 程序的正确验证，这可导致类型混淆情形。攻击者可利用此漏洞，在内核的上下文中提升特权和执行任意代码。此漏洞之前为 ZDI-CAN-14689。(CVE-2021-34866)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：kyber: fix out of bounds access when preempted __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() gets the ctx and hctx for the current CPU and passes the hctx to
    ->bio_merge(). kyber_bio_merge() then gets the ctx for the current CPU again and uses that to get the corresponding Kyber context in the passed hctx. However, the thread may be preempted between the two calls to blk_mq_get_ctx(), and the ctx returned the second time may no longer correspond to the passed hctx.
    This works accidentally most of the time, but it can cause us to read garbage if the second ctx came from an hctx with more ctx's than the first one (i.e., if ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] > hctx->nr_ctx). This manifested as this UBSAN array index out of bounds error reported by Jakub: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:130:9 index 13106 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [128]' Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
    __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold.13+0x2a/0x34 queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x476/0x480 do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c2/0x1d0 kyber_bio_merge+0x112/0x180 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1f5/0x1100 submit_bio_noacct+0x7b0/0x870 submit_bio+0xc2/0x3a0 btrfs_map_bio+0x4f0/0x9d0 btrfs_submit_data_bio+0x24e/0x310 submit_one_bio+0x7f/0xb0 submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x440
    __extent_writepage_io+0x2b8/0x5e0 __extent_writepage+0x28d/0x6e0 extent_write_cache_pages+0x4d7/0x7a0 extent_writepages+0xa2/0x110 do_writepages+0x8f/0x180 __writeback_single_inode+0x99/0x7f0 writeback_sb_inodes+0x34e/0x790 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9e/0x120 wb_writeback+0x4d2/0x660 wb_workfn+0x64d/0xa10 process_one_work+0x53a/0xa80 worker_thread+0x69/0x5b0 kthread+0x20b/0x240 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Only Kyber uses the hctx, so fix it by passing the request_queue to ->bio_merge() instead. BFQ and mq-deadline just use that, and Kyber can map the queues itself to avoid the mismatch.
    (CVE-2021-46984)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

AlmaLinux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1780562693 2公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 在低于 5.16.12 版本的 Linux 内核中发现一个问题。drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c 允许攻击者通过设备中构建的帧长度从堆内存获取敏感信息。(CVE-2022-26966)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：kprobes: don't call disarm_kprobe() for disabled kprobes The assumption in __disable_kprobe() is wrong, and it could try to disarm an already disarmed kprobe and fire the WARN_ONCE() below. [0] We can easily reproduce this issue. 1. Write 0 to /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled. # echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled 2. Run execsnoop. At this time, one kprobe is disabled. # /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop & [1] 2460 PCOMM PID PPID RET ARGS # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list ffffffff91345650 r __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [FTRACE] ffffffff91345650 k
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [DISABLED][FTRACE] 3. Write 1 to /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled, which changes kprobes_all_disarmed to false but does not arm the disabled kprobe. # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list ffffffff91345650 r
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [FTRACE] ffffffff91345650 k __x64_sys_execve+0x0 [DISABLED][FTRACE] 4. Kill execsnoop, when __disable_kprobe() calls disarm_kprobe() for the disabled kprobe and hits the WARN_ONCE() in __disarm_kprobe_ftrace(). # fg /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop ^C Actually, WARN_ONCE() is fired twice, and __unregister_kprobe_top() misses some cleanups and leaves the aggregated kprobe in the hash table.
    Then, __unregister_trace_kprobe() initialises tk->rp.kp.list and creates an infinite loop like this.
    aggregated kprobe.list -> kprobe.list -. ^ | '.__.' In this situation, these commands fall into the infinite loop and result in RCU stall or soft lockup. cat /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list :
    show_kprobe_addr() enters into the infinite loop with RCU. /usr/share/bcc/tools/execsnoop :
    warn_kprobe_rereg() holds kprobe_mutex, and __get_valid_kprobe() is stuck in the loop. To avoid the issue, make sure we don't call disarm_kprobe() for disabled kprobes. [0] Failed to disarm kprobe-ftrace at
    __x64_sys_execve+0x0/0x40 (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2460 at kernel/kprobes.c:1130
    __disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.19 (kernel/kprobes.c:1129) Modules linked in: ena CPU: 6 PID: 2460 Comm:
    execsnoop Not tainted 5.19.0+ #28 Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c5.2xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017 RIP:
    0010:__disarm_kprobe_ftrace.isra.19 (kernel/kprobes.c:1129) Code: 24 8b 02 eb c1 80 3d c4 83 f2 01 00 75 d4 48 8b 75 00 89 c2 48 c7 c7 90 fa 0f 92 89 04 24 c6 05 ab 83 01 e8 e4 94 f0 ff <0f> 0b 8b 04 24 eb b1 89 c6 48 c7 c7 60 fa 0f 92 89 04 24 e8 cc 94 RSP: 0018:ffff9e6ec154bd98 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX:
    0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff930f7b00 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff921461c5 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff89c504286da8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000fffeffff R10:
    0000000000000000 R11: ffff9e6ec154bc28 R12: ffff89c502394e40 R13: ffff89c502394c00 R14: ffff9e6ec154bc00 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fe800398740(0000) GS:ffff89c812d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000c00057f010 CR3: 0000000103b54006 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
    00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> __disable_kprobe (kernel/kprobes.c:1716) disable_kprobe (kernel/kprobes.c:2392) __disable_trace_kprobe (kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:340) disable_trace_kprobe (kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:429) perf_trace_event_unreg.isra.2 (./include/linux/tracepoint.h:93 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:168) perf_kprobe_destroy (kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:295) _free_event (kernel/events/core.c:4971) perf_event_release_kernel (kernel/events/core.c:5176) perf_release (kernel/events/core.c:5186) __fput (fs/file_table.c:321) task_work_run (./include/linux/ ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-50008)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing/hist: Fix out-of-bound write on 'action_data.var_ref_idx' When generate a synthetic event with many params and then create a trace action for it [1], kernel panic happened [2]. It is because that in trace_action_create() 'data->n_params' is up to SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX (current value is 64), and array 'data->var_ref_idx' keeps indices into array 'hist_data->var_refs' for each synthetic event param, but the length of 'data->var_ref_idx' is TRACING_MAP_VARS_MAX (current value is 16), so out-of-bound write happened when 'data->n_params' more than 16. In this case, 'data->match_data.event' is overwritten and eventually cause the panic. To solve the issue, adjust the length of 'data->var_ref_idx' to be SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX and add sanity checks to avoid out-of-bound write. [1] # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # echo my_synth_event int v1; int v2; int v3; int v4; int v5; int v6;\ int v7; int v8; int v9; int v10; int v11; int v12; int v13; int v14;\ int v15; int v16; int v17; int v18; int v19; int v20; int v21; int v22;\ int v23; int v24; int v25; int v26; int v27; int v28;
    int v29; int v30;\ int v31; int v32; int v33; int v34; int v35; int v36; int v37; int v38;\ int v39; int v40; int v41; int v42; int v43; int v44; int v45; int v46;\ int v47; int v48; int v49; int v50; int v51;
    int v52; int v53; int v54;\ int v55; int v56; int v57; int v58; int v59; int v60; int v61; int v62;\ int v63 >> synthetic_events # echo 'hist:keys=pid:ts0=common_timestamp.usecs if comm==bash' >> \ events/sched/sched_waking/trigger # echo hist:keys=next_pid:onmatch(sched.sched_waking).my_synth_event(\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,\ pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid,pid) >> events/sched/sched_switch/trigger [2] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff91c900000000 PGD 61001067 P4D 61001067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU:
    2 PID: 322 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 6.1.0-rc8+ #229 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:strcmp+0xc/0x30 Code: 75 f7 31 d2 44 0f b6 04 16 44 88 04 11 48 83 c2 01 45 84 c0 75 ee c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 00 31 c0 eb 08 48 83 c0 01 84 d2 74 13 <0f> b6 14 07 3a 14 06 74 ef 19 c0 83 c8 01 c3 cc cc cc cc 31 c3 RSP: 0018:ffff9b3b00f53c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffba958a68 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffff91c943d33a90 RDI: ffff91c900000000 RBP: ffff91c900000000 R08: 00000018d604b529 R09:
    0000000000000000 R10: ffff91c9483eddb1 R11: ffff91ca483eddab R12: ffff91c946171580 R13: ffff91c9479f0538 R14: ffff91c9457c2848 R15: ffff91c9479f0538 FS: 00007f1d1cfbe740(0000) GS:ffff91c9bdc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff91c900000000 CR3:
    0000000006316000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_event_file+0x55/0x90 action_create+0x76c/0x1060 event_hist_trigger_parse+0x146d/0x2060 ? event_trigger_write+0x31/0xd0 trigger_process_regex+0xbb/0x110 event_trigger_write+0x6b/0xd0 vfs_write+0xc8/0x3e0 ? alloc_fd+0xc0/0x160 ? preempt_count_add+0x4d/0xa0 ? preempt_count_add+0x70/0xa0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f1d1d0cf077 Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 RSP: 002b:00007ffcebb0e568 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
    0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000143 RCX: 00007f1d1d0cf077 RDX: 0000000000000143 RSI: 00005639265aa7e0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00005639265aa7e0 R08: 000000000000000a R09:
    0000000000000142 R ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-50553)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: can: j1939: enhanced error handling for tightly received RTS messages in xtp_rx_rts_session_new This patch enhances error handling in scenarios with RTS (Request to Send) messages arriving closely. It replaces the less informative WARN_ON_ONCE backtraces with a new error handling method. This provides clearer error messages and allows for the early termination of problematic sessions. Previously, sessions were only released at the end of j1939_xtp_rx_rts(). Potentially this could be reproduced with something like: testj1939 -r vcan0:0x80 & while true; do # send first RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send second RTS cansend vcan0 18EC8090#1014000303002301; # send abort cansend vcan0 18EC8090#ff00000000002301; done (CVE-2023-52887)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: fec: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks There is a deadlock issue found in sungem driver, please refer to the commit ac0a230f719b (eth: sungem: remove .ndo_poll_controller to avoid deadlocks). The root cause of the issue is that netpoll is in atomic context and disable_irq() is called by .ndo_poll_controller interface of sungem driver, however, disable_irq() might sleep. After analyzing the implementation of fec_poll_controller(), the fec driver should have the same issue. Due to the fec driver uses NAPI for TX completions, the .ndo_poll_controller is unnecessary to be implemented in the fec driver, so fec_poll_controller() can be safely removed. (CVE-2024-38553)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

CentOS Linux 8 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2026：1783790425 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - netfilter 中存在的一个缺陷可允许联网攻击者推断 openvpn 连接端点信息，从而进一步使用这些信息发动传统网络攻击。(CVE-2021-3773)

  - 在代理虚拟化 TPM 设备的 Linux 内核实现中发现一个缺陷。在配置了虚拟化 TPM 设备（并非默认配置）的系统上，本地攻击者可以造成释放后使用错误，并且可能会提升系统权限。(CVE-2022-2977)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the type field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other events). A type number is the identifier of the binary blobs in the tracing ring buffer (known as events) to map them to logic that can parse the binary blob. The issue is that if a dynamic event (like a kprobe event) is traced and is in the ring buffer, and then that event is removed (because it is dynamic, which means it can be created and destroyed), if another dynamic event is created that has the same number that new event's logic on parsing the binary blob will be used. To show how this can be an issue, the following can crash the kernel: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing # for i in `seq 65536`; do echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 $arg1:u32' > kprobe_events # done For every iteration of the above, the writing to the kprobe_events will remove the old event and create a new one (with the same format) and increase the type number to the next available on until the type number reaches over 65535 which is the max number for the 16 bit type. After it reaches that number, the logic to allocate a new number simply looks for the next available number.
    When an dynamic event is removed, that number is then available to be reused by the next dynamic event created. That is, once the above reaches the max number, the number assigned to the event in that loop will remain the same. Now that means deleting one dynamic event and created another will reuse the previous events type number. This is where bad things can happen. After the above loop finishes, the kprobes/foo event which reads the do_sys_openat2 function call's first parameter as an integer. # echo 1 > kprobes/foo/enable # cat /etc/passwd > /dev/null # cat trace cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849603: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849620: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849838: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849880: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 # echo 0 > kprobes/foo/enable Now if we delete the kprobe and create a new one that reads a string: # echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 +0($arg2):string' > kprobe_events And now we can the trace: # cat trace sendmail-1942 [002] ..... 530.136320: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930817: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930961: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934278: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934563: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-49006)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event() In register_synth_event(), if set_synth_event_print_fmt() failed, then both trace_remove_event_call() and unregister_trace_event() will be called, which means the trace_event_call will call __unregister_trace_event() twice. As the result, the second unregister will causes the wild-memory-access. register_synth_event set_synth_event_print_fmt failed trace_remove_event_call event_remove if call->event.funcs then __unregister_trace_event (first call) unregister_trace_event
    __unregister_trace_event (second call) Fix the bug by avoiding to call the second
    __unregister_trace_event() by checking if the first one is called. general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127] CPU: 0 PID: 3807 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00186-g76f33a7eedb4 #299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:unregister_trace_event+0x6e/0x280 Code:
    00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 0e 02 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 63 08 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 e2 01 00 00 49 89 2c 24 48 85 ed 74 28 e8 7a 9b RSP:
    0018:ffff88810413f370 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888105d050b0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 1bd5a00000000024 RSI: ffff888119e276e0 RDI: ffffffff835a8b20 RBP: dead000000000100 R08:
    0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0913481 R10: ffffffff8489a407 R11: fffffbfff0913480 R12: dead000000000122 R13: ffff888105d050b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888105d05028 FS: 00007f7823e8d540(0000) GS:ffff888119e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2:
    00007f7823e7ebec CR3: 000000010a058002 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK>
    __create_synth_event+0x1e37/0x1eb0 create_or_delete_synth_event+0x110/0x250 synth_event_run_command+0x2f/0x110 test_gen_synth_cmd+0x170/0x2eb [synth_event_gen_test] synth_event_gen_test_init+0x76/0x9bc [synth_event_gen_test] do_one_initcall+0xdb/0x480 do_init_module+0x1cf/0x680 load_module+0x6a50/0x70a0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x12f/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd (CVE-2022-49799)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：ata: libata-transport: fix double ata_host_put() in ata_tport_add() In the error path in ata_tport_add(), when calling put_device(), ata_tport_release() is called, it will put the refcount of 'ap->host'. And then ata_host_put() is called again, the refcount is decreased to 0, ata_host_release() is called, all ports are freed and set to null.
    When unbinding the device after failure, ata_host_stop() is called to release the resources, it leads a null-ptr-deref(), because all the ports all freed and null. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008 CPU: 7 PID: 18671 Comm: modprobe Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.1.0-rc3+ #8 pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc :
    ata_host_stop+0x3c/0x84 [libata] lr : release_nodes+0x64/0xd0 Call trace: ata_host_stop+0x3c/0x84 [libata] release_nodes+0x64/0xd0 devres_release_all+0xbc/0x1b0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x20/0x70 really_probe+0x158/0x320 __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x120
    __driver_attach+0xb4/0x220 bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xdc driver_attach+0x2c/0x40 bus_add_driver+0x184/0x240 driver_register+0x80/0x13c __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0x60 ahci_pci_driver_init+0x30/0x1000 [ahci] Fix this by removing redundant ata_host_put() in the error path. (CVE-2022-49826)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

如 TuxCare CENTOS7：CLSA-2026：1782148320公告所述，CentOS Linux 7 主机上存在安装的程序包，该漏洞会受到多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：media: ngene: Fix out-of-bounds bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf() Fix an 11-year old bug in ngene_command_config_free_buf() while addressing the following warnings caught with -Warray-bounds: arch/alpha/include/asm/string.h:22:16: warning:
    '__builtin_memcpy' offset [12, 16] from the object at 'com' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'config' with type 'unsigned char' at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds] arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25:
    warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [12, 16] from the object at 'com' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'config' with type 'unsigned char' at offset 10 [-Warray-bounds] The problem is that the original code is trying to copy 6 bytes of data into a one-byte size member _config_ of the wrong structue FW_CONFIGURE_BUFFERS, in a single call to memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy() overruns the length of &com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config. It seems that the right structure is FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS, instead, because it contains 6 more members apart from the header _hdr_. Also, the name of the function ngene_command_config_free_buf() suggests that the actual intention is to ConfigureFreeBuffers, instead of ConfigureBuffers (which takes place in the function ngene_command_config_buf(), above). Fix this by enclosing those 6 members of struct FW_CONFIGURE_FREE_BUFFERS into new struct config, and use &com.cmd.ConfigureFreeBuffers.config as the destination address, instead of &com.cmd.ConfigureBuffers.config, when calling memcpy(). This also helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy(). (CVE-2021-47288)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：nvme: fix a possible use-after-free in controller reset during load Unlike .queue_rq, in .submit_async_event drivers may not check the ctrl readiness for AER submission. This may lead to a use-after-free condition that was observed with nvme-tcp.
    The race condition may happen in the following scenario: 1. driver executes its reset_ctrl_work 2. -> nvme_stop_ctrl - flushes ctrl async_event_work 3. ctrl sends AEN which is received by the host, which in turn schedules AEN handling 4. teardown admin queue (which releases the queue socket) 5. AEN processed, submits another AER, calling the driver to submit 6. driver attempts to send the cmd ==> use-after-free In order to fix that, add ctrl state check to validate the ctrl is actually able to accept the AER submission. This addresses the above race in controller resets because the driver during teardown should:
    1. change ctrl state to RESETTING 2. flush async_event_work (as well as other async work elements) So after 1,2, any other AER command will find the ctrl state to be RESETTING and bail out without submitting the AER. (CVE-2022-48790)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：scsi: pm8001: Fix use-after-free for aborted TMF sas_task Currently a use-after-free may occur if a TMF sas_task is aborted before we handle the IO completion in mpi_ssp_completion(). The abort occurs due to timeout. When the timeout occurs, the SAS_TASK_STATE_ABORTED flag is set and the sas_task is freed in pm8001_exec_internal_tmf_task(). However, if the I/O completion occurs later, the I/O completion still thinks that the sas_task is available. Fix this by clearing the ccb->task if the TMF times out - the I/O completion handler does nothing if this pointer is cleared. (CVE-2022-48791)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing: Free buffers when a used dynamic event is removed After 65536 dynamic events have been added and removed, the type field of the event then uses the first type number that is available (not currently used by other events). A type number is the identifier of the binary blobs in the tracing ring buffer (known as events) to map them to logic that can parse the binary blob. The issue is that if a dynamic event (like a kprobe event) is traced and is in the ring buffer, and then that event is removed (because it is dynamic, which means it can be created and destroyed), if another dynamic event is created that has the same number that new event's logic on parsing the binary blob will be used. To show how this can be an issue, the following can crash the kernel: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing # for i in `seq 65536`; do echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 $arg1:u32' > kprobe_events # done For every iteration of the above, the writing to the kprobe_events will remove the old event and create a new one (with the same format) and increase the type number to the next available on until the type number reaches over 65535 which is the max number for the 16 bit type. After it reaches that number, the logic to allocate a new number simply looks for the next available number.
    When an dynamic event is removed, that number is then available to be reused by the next dynamic event created. That is, once the above reaches the max number, the number assigned to the event in that loop will remain the same. Now that means deleting one dynamic event and created another will reuse the previous events type number. This is where bad things can happen. After the above loop finishes, the kprobes/foo event which reads the do_sys_openat2 function call's first parameter as an integer. # echo 1 > kprobes/foo/enable # cat /etc/passwd > /dev/null # cat trace cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849603: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849620: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849838: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 cat-2211 [005] .... 2007.849880: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x130) arg1=4294967196 # echo 0 > kprobes/foo/enable Now if we delete the kprobe and create a new one that reads a string: # echo 'p:kprobes/foo do_sys_openat2 +0($arg2):string' > kprobe_events And now we can the trace: # cat trace sendmail-1942 [002] ..... 530.136320: foo:
    (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930817: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.930961: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934278: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= cat-2046 [004] ..... 530.934563: foo: (do_sys_openat2+0x0/0x240) arg1= ---truncated--- (CVE-2022-49006)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：dm raid: fix accesses beyond end of raid member array On dm-raid table load (using raid_ctr), dm-raid allocates an array rs->devs[rs->raid_disks] for the raid device members. rs->raid_disks is defined by the number of raid metadata and image tupples passed into the target's constructor. In the case of RAID layout changes being requested, that number can be different from the current number of members for existing raid sets as defined in their superblocks. Example RAID layout changes include: - raid1 legs being added/removed - raid4/5/6/10 number of stripes changed (stripe reshaping) - takeover to higher raid level (e.g. raid5 -> raid6) When accessing array members, rs->raid_disks must be used in control loops instead of the potentially larger value in rs->md.raid_disks. Otherwise it will cause memory access beyond the end of the rs->devs array. Fix this by changing code that is prone to out-of-bounds access. Also fix validate_raid_redundancy() to validate all devices that are added. Also, use braces to help clean up raid_iterate_devices(). The out-of-bounds memory accesses was discovered using KASAN. This commit was verified to pass all LVM2 RAID tests (with KASAN enabled). (CVE-2022-49674)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Oracle Linux 10 / 9 主机上安装的多个程序包受到 ELSA-2026-50372 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    - net/sched：修复导致页面缓存损坏的 pedit 部分 COW(Rajat Gupta) {CVE-2026-46331}
    - eventpoll：修复ep_remove结构 eventpoll / 结构文件 UAF （Christian Brauner） [Orabug： 39668743] {CVE-2026-46242}
    - net：skbuff：修复pskb_carve帮助程序中缺少的 zerocopy 引用 （Minh Nguyen） [Orabug： 39656679] {CVE-2026-52943}
    - arm64：勘误表：缓解各种 Arm CPU 上的 TLBI 勘误表 （Mark Rutland） [Orabug： 39548792] {CVE-2025-10263}
    - openvswitch： vport：修复释放隧道端口时的自死锁 （Ilya Maximets） {CVE-2026-46165}
    - iommu/amd：在并发 TLB 无效的情况下序列化序列分配 （Ankit Soni） {CVE-2026-43220}
    - usb：ulpi：修复 ulpi_register（） 错误路径中的内存泄漏 （Felix Gu） {CVE-2026-46109}
    - smb：客户端：拒绝用户空间 cifs.spnego 描述 （Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada） [Orabug： 39463671] {CVE-2026-46243}
    - net：skbuff：通过 frag-transfer 帮助程序传播 shared-frag 标记 (Hyunwoo Kim) [Orabug:
    39368826,39441323] {CVE-2026-43503，CVE-2026-46300}
    - net：skbuff：在合并期间保留 shared-frag 标记(William Bowling) [Orabug: 39368826] {CVE-2026-46300}
    - netfilter：拒绝 nft_bitwise 中的零位移 (Kai Ma) [Orabug: 39452464] {CVE-2026-46101}
    - net：ipv6：修复 seg6 和 rpl lwtunnels 中使用的 NOREF dst （Andrea Mayer） [Orabug： 39452457] {CVE-2026-46099}
    - ALSA：caiaq：修复探usb_dev故障时的 refcount 泄漏 （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug： 39452739] {CVE-2026-46048}
    - ipv6：rpl：重新压缩的 SRH 增长时预留mac_len余量 （Greg Kroah-Hartman） [Orabug：39426003] {CVE-2026-43501}
    - ALSA：caiaq：修复错误路径中可能残留的ep1_in_urb （Takashi Iwai） [Orabug： 39452746] {CVE-2026-45992}
    - net: bonding：修复 bond_xmit_broadcast() 中的释放后使用(Xiang Mei) [Orabug: 39205989] {CVE-2026-31419}
    - crypto：authencesn - 拒绝实例创建期间的短 ahash 摘要 （Yucheng Lu） [Orabug： 39452231] {CVE-2026-46033}
    - spi：修复设备设置失败时的资源泄漏 （Johan Hovold） [Orabug： 39452400] {CVE-2026-46083}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制节点总数 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug：39452123] {CVE-2026-46003}
    - net：bridge：在 RCU 阅读器中使用稳定的 FDB dst 快照 （Zhengchuan Liang） [Orabug： 39452411] {CVE-2026-46086}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制查询的最大次数 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug: 39452207] {CVE-2026-46026}
    - net：qrtr：ns：限制每个节点的最大服务器注册节点数量 (Manivannan Sadhasivam) [Orabug: 39410851] {CVE-2026-43491}
    - RDMA/mana_ib：禁用 RSS QP 破坏时的 RX 转向 （Long Li） [Orabug： 39452406] {CVE-2026-46084}
    - media：rc：igorplugusb：注意一致性规则 （Oliver Neukum） [Orabug：39452432] {CVE-2026-46091}
    - wifi：mwifiex：修复 mwifiex_adapter_cleanup（） 中的释放后使用 （Daniel Hodges） [Orabug： 39452343] {CVE-2026-46069}
    - thermal：core：修复热区域调控器清理问题 （Rafael J. Wysocki） [Orabug： 39452186] {CVE-2026-46021}
    - smb：客户端：在 cifsacl 中重写 DACL 之前对其进行全面验证 (Michael Bommarito) [Orabug:
    39300611] {CVE-2026-31709}
    - scsi：sd：修复 device_add（&disk_dev） 失败时缺少的 put_disk（） （Yang Xiuwei） [Orabug： 39452100] {CVE-2026-45997}
    - rtmutex：在 remove_waiter（） 中使用 waiter：：task 而不是当前的任务 （Keenan Dong） [Orabug: 39425998] {CVE-2026-43499}
    - ceph：反哈希时仅 d_add（） 负 dentry （Max Kellermann） [Orabug： 39452291] {CVE-2026-46052}
    - dm mirror：修复 create_dirty_log（） 中的整数溢出 （Junrui Luo） [Orabug： 39452196] {CVE-2026-46023}
    - Bluetooth：hci_event：修复 SSP 通行密钥处理程序中潜在的 UAF (Shuvam Pandey) [Orabug: 39452304] {CVE-2026-46056}
    - tcp：监听器迁移后调用 sk_data_ready（） （Zhenzhong Wu） [Orabug： 39452159] {CVE-2026-46015}
    - inotify：修复 fsnotify_add_inode_mark_locked（） 失败时的监视计数泄漏 （Chia-Ming Chang） [Orabug：
    39452250] {CVE-2026-46040}
    - md/raid5：在访问日志元数据之前验证负载大小 （Junrui Luo） [Orabug： 39452349] {CVE-2026-46070}
    - md/raid5：修复 retry_aligned_read（） 中的软锁定 （Chia-Ming Chang） [Orabug： 39452287] {CVE-2026-46051}
    - ext4：修复 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all（） 中缺少的 brelse（） （Sohei Koyama） [Orabug： 39452269] {CVE-2026-46046}
    - ext4：修复 check_xattrs（） 中的边界检查以防止越界访问 （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug：
    39452442] {CVE-2026-46094}
    - io_uring/poll：修复唤醒争用中缺少 EOF 的 multishot recv （Jens Axboe） {CVE-2026-23473}
    - KVM：nSVM：如果未处理的 VMMCALL 未被 L1 拦截则引发 #UD （Kevin Cheng） [Orabug： 39452372] {CVE-2026-46076}
    - KVM：SVM：如果 EFER，则为 INVLPGA 注入 #UD。SVME=0 （Kevin Cheng） [Orabug： 39452394] {CVE-2026-46082}
    - KVM：nSVM：在 L2 的 VMRUN 之后将中断阴影同步到缓存的 vmcb12 （Yosry Ahmed） [Orabug： 39452061] {CVE-2026-45987}
    - xfs：修复 xfs_alloc_buftarg（） 中的一个资源泄漏 （Haoxiang Li） [Orabug： 39452131] {CVE-2026-46005}
    - libceph：防止 ceph_handle_auth_reply（） 中潜在的 null-ptr-deref （Raphael Zimmer） [Orabug：
    39452201] {CVE-2026-46024}
    - ipv4：icmp：使用 icmp_pointers 之前验证回复类型 （Ruide Cao） [Orabug： 39452243] {CVE-2026-46037}
    - RDMA/rxe：在 rxe_rcv 中 payload_size（） 前验证 pad 和 ICRC （Hkbinbin） [Orabug： 39452259] {CVE-2026-46043}
    - net：qrtr：ns：ctrl_cmd_bye（） 期间释放节点 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug： 39452246] {CVE-2026-46038}
    - rxrpc：修复 rxkad 加密未对齐处理 （David Howells） [Orabug： 39452728] {CVE-2026-46085}
    - ALSA：caiaq：正确处理探测错误 （Takashi Iwai） [Orabug：39452126] {CVE-2026-46004}
    - rbd：修复 device_add_disk（） 失败时的 null-ptr-deref （Dawei Feng） [Orabug： 39452385] {CVE-2026-46079}
    - md/raid10：通过检查操作和 nowait 请求修复死锁 （Josh Hunt） [Orabug： 39452284] {CVE-2026-46050}
    - jbd2：修复 jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke（） 中的死锁 （Zhang Yi） [Orabug： 39452318] {CVE-2026-46061}
    - erofs：修复尾随 dirents 的越界 nameoff 处理 （Gao Xiang） [Orabug： 39452380] {CVE-2026-46078}
    - ALSA：ctxfi：添加回退到 S/PDIF 的默认 RSR （Harin Lee） [Orabug： 39452280] {CVE-2026-46049}
    - ext2：拒绝 ext2_iget（） 中含零i_nlink和有效模式的 inode （Vasiliy Kovalev） [Orabug： 39452119] {CVE-2026-46002}
    - net：qrtr：ns：修复驱动程序 remove（） 中的释放后使用 （Manivannan Sadhasivam） [Orabug： 39452274] {CVE-2026-46047}
    - net：strparser：修复 strp_abort_strp（） 中的skb_head泄漏 （Luxiao Xu） [Orabug： 39452468] {CVE-2026-46102}
    - ALSA：control：在 snd_ctl_elem_init_enum_names（） 中的 strnlen（） 之前验证 buf_len （Ziqing Chen） [Orabug： 39452416] {CVE-2026-46088}
    - crypto： pcrypt - 修复MAY_BACKLOG请求的处理 （Herbert Xu） [Orabug： 39410863] {CVE-2026-43493}
    - wifi：rtw88：检查 PCI 上游桥是否存在 （Fedor Pchelkin） [Orabug： 39452437] {CVE-2026-46092}
    - zram：不忘记为部分丢弃请求执行 endio （Sergey Senozhatsky） [Orabug： 39452420] {CVE-2026-46089}
    - ocfs2：拆分 dio 完成中的事务以避免信用耗尽 （Heming Zhao） [Orabug： 39452388] {CVE-2026-46080}
    - drm/amdgpu：限制 BO 列表条目计数以防止资源耗尽 （Jesse Zhang） [Orabug： 39167551] {CVE-2026-23468}
    - padata：一劳永逸地修复 pd UAF （Herbert Xu） [Orabug： 38335055] {CVE-2025-38584}
    - drm/nouveau：修复 pushbuf 重定位边界检查中的 u32 溢出 （Greg Kroah-Hartman） [Orabug： 39452133] {CVE-2026-46006}
    - ALSA：usb-audio：停止以 MAX_NR_RATES 速率解析 UAC2 速率 （Cassio Gabriel） [Orabug： 39452170] {CVE-2026-46018}
    - drivers/xen/sys-hypervisor.c 中的缓冲区溢出 （Juergen Gross） [Orabug： 39305898] {CVE-2026-31786}
    - xen/privcmd：通过 VMA 拆分修复双重释放 （Juergen Gross） [Orabug： 39305908] {CVE-2026-31787}
    - rxrpc：修复非 XDR 密钥准备中缺失的票证长度验证 （Anderson Nascimento） [Orabug：
    39300563] {CVE-2026-31696}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 ID 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31697}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 PDH cert 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31698}
    - crypto：ccp：如果 PSP 命令失败，请勿尝试将 CSR 复制到用户空间 （Sean Christopherson） {CVE-2026-31699}
    - net/packet：修复 tpacket_snd（） 中的 mmap'd vnet_hdr 上的 TOCTOU 争用 （Bingquan Chen） {CVE-2026-31700}
    - ALSA：caiaq：在 create_card（） 中引用 USB 设备 （Berk Cem Goksel） [Orabug： 39300586] {CVE-2026-31701}
    - smb：客户端：修复smb2_ioctl_query_info QUERY_INFO路径中的 OOB 读取 （Michael Bommarito） [Orabug：
    39300607] {CVE-2026-31708}
    - smb：客户端：读取模式位之前需要完整 NFS 模式 SID （Michael Bommarito） [Orabug： 39343707] {CVE-2026-43350}
    - fuse：拒绝页面缓存中的超大问题 （Samuel Page） [Orabug： 39300556] {CVE-2026-31694}
    - mm/pagewalk：修复并发拆分和重错之间的争用 （Max Boone） [Orabug： 39250782] {CVE-2026-31456}
    - wifi：mac80211：ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb（） 失败时始终释放 skb （Felix Fietkau） [Orabug： 39167472] {CVE-2026-23444}
    - mm/userfaultfd：修复 hugetlb 错误互斥体哈希计算 （Jianhui Zhou） [Orabug： 39273453] {CVE-2026-31575}
    - ipv6：在 SRv6 路径中添加对 idev 的空检查 （Heminhong） [Orabug： 39167467] {CVE-2026-23442}
    - ocfs2：修复 ocfs2_write_end_inline 中的越界写入 （Joseph Qi） [Orabug： 39331090] {CVE-2026-43075}
    - ocfs2：在 inode 读取期间验证内联数据i_size （Deepanshu Kartikey） [Orabug： 39331097] {CVE-2026-43076}
    - media：as102：修复在 as102_usb_probe（） 中注册设备后不释放内存 （Jeongjun Park） [Orabug： 39273467] {CVE-2026-31578}
    - bcache：修复 cached_dev.sb_bio 释放后使用和崩溃 （Mingzhe Zou） [Orabug： 39273481] {CVE-2026-31580}
    - ALSA：6fire：修复断开连接时的释放后使用 （Berk Cem Goksel） [Orabug： 39273486] {CVE-2026-31581}
    - media：em28xx：修复 em28xx_v4l2_open（） 中的释放后使用 （Abhishek Kumar） [Orabug： 39273493] {CVE-2026-31583}
    - mm：blk-cgroup：修复 cgwb_release_workfn（） 中的释放后使用 （Breno Leitao） [Orabug： 39273507] {CVE-2026-31586}
    - KVM：x86：使用 MMIO 片段中的擦除字段保存小写入值 （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug：
    39273521] {CVE-2026-31588}
    - x86-64：重命名名称令人误解的“__copy_user_nocache（）”函数 （Linus Torvalds） [Orabug： 39323162] {CVE-2026-43073}
    - kernel：谨慎处理 dup_mmap() 失败和 uprobe 注册 (Liam R. Howlett) {CVE-2025-21709}
    - gpiolib：修复 gdev->srcu 的争用条件 （Pawel Narewski） [Orabug： 38887677] {CVE-2026-22986}
    - KVM：SEV：终止对KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION大尺寸的警告 （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug：
    39273529] {CVE-2026-31590}
    - KVM：SEV：拒绝尝试同步已启动/加密的 vCPU 的 VMSA （Sean Christopherson） [Orabug： 39273553] {CVE-2026-31593}
    - ocfs2：处理 ocfs2_group_extend 中无效的 dinode （Zhengyuan Huang） [Orabug： 39273569] {CVE-2026-31596}
    - ocfs2：修复VM_FAULT_RETRY时 ocfs2_fault（） 中的释放后使用 （Tejas Bharambe） [Orabug： 39273578] {CVE-2026-31597}
    - ocfs2：修复 unlink 和 dio_end_io_write 之间可能的死锁 （Joseph Qi） [Orabug： 39273586] {CVE-2026-31598}
    - dcache：将存储段的最小数量限制为两个 （Zhihao Cheng） [Orabug： 39323133] {CVE-2026-43071}
    - ALSA：ctxfi：将 PTP 限制为单页 （Harin Lee） [Orabug：39273608] {CVE-2026-31602}
    - wifi：rtw88：修复探查故障时的设备泄漏 （Johan Hovold） [Orabug： 39273620] {CVE-2026-31604}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

如 TuxCare CENTOS8.5：CLSA-2026：1782146775公告所述，CentOS Linux 8.5 主机上安装的程序包受到多个漏洞的影响。

  - Linux 内核 CIFS 实现版本 4.9.0 容易受到目录条目列表中相对路径注入的影响。(CVE-2019-10220)

  - Linux 内核 4.20.5 及其之前版本的 KVM 实现中存在释放后使用。(CVE-2019-7221)

  - BlueZ 中存在输入验证不当的情况，未经身份验证的用户可能利用此漏洞，通过邻近访问，提升权限。(CVE-2020-12351)

  - BlueZ 中存在访问控制不当的情况，未经身份验证的用户可利用此问题，通过邻近访问造成信息泄露。(CVE-2020-12352)

  - BlueZ 中存在缓冲区限制不当的情况，未经身份验证的用户可能会利用此漏洞，通过邻近访问来造成拒绝服务。这会影响所有支持 BlueZ 的 Linux 内核版本。(CVE-2020-24490)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
361263	Rocky Linux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-abi-stablelists / kernel-core / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1780562693）	Nessus	Rocky Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/1	high
304929	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2026-23448	Nessus	Misc.	2026/4/5	2026/9/30	high
311299	Debian dsa-6238 ： ata-modules-6.12.74+deb13+1-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/4/30	2026/5/8	high
361823	AlmaLinux 9.2 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-abi-stablelists / kernel-core / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1782151303）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/2	high
340680	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS / Pro Realtime 24.04 LTS：Linux 内核（Raspberry Pi）漏洞（USN-8665-1）	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/8/26	2026/8/27	high
360976	CentOS Linux 8.4 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞（CENTOS8.4：CLSA-2026：1782145985）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/1	high
361300	AlmaLinux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-abi-stablelists / kernel-core / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1780562693）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/1	high
352893	CentOS Linux 8 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞（CENTOS-STREAM8：CLSA-2026：1783790425）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/9/30	2026/10/1	critical
353232	CentOS Linux 7 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-debug / kernel-debug-devel / kernel-devel / 等多个漏洞（CENTOS7：CLSA-2026：1782148320）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/9/30	2026/9/30	high
325292	Oracle Linux 10 / 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2026-50372)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/7/6	2026/7/8	high
360215	CentOS Linux 8.5 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞（CENTOS8.5：CLSA-2026：1782146775）	Nessus	CentOS Local Security Checks	2026/10/1	2026/10/1	high

检测

插件搜索

high

high

high

high

high

high

high

critical

high

high

high