AlmaLinux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1793370479公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：wifi: ath12k: Fix buffer overflow in debugfs If the user tries to write more than 32 bytes then it results in memory corruption. Fortunately, this is debugfs so it's limited to root users. (CVE-2025-38317)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：drm/xe/pf: Clear all LMTT pages on alloc Our LMEM buffer objects are not cleared by default on alloc and during VF provisioning we only setup LMTT PTEs for the actually provisioned LMEM range. But beyond that valid range we might leave some stale data that could either point to some other VFs allocations or even to the PF pages. Explicitly clear all new LMTT page to avoid the risk that a malicious VF would try to exploit that gap. While around add asserts to catch any undesired PTE overwrites and low-level debug traces to track LMTT PT life-cycle.
    (cherry picked from commit 3fae6918a3e27cce20ded2551f863fb05d4bef8d) (CVE-2025-38511)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：wifi: ath12k: fix memory leak in ath12k_service_ready_ext_event Currently, in ath12k_service_ready_ext_event(), svc_rdy_ext.mac_phy_caps is not freed in the failure case, causing a memory leak. The following trace is observed in kmemleak:
    unreferenced object 0xffff8b3eb5789c00 (size 1024): comm softirq, pid 0, jiffies 4294942577 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7b 00 00 10 ............{... 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 1f 38 00 00 .............8.. backtrace (crc 44e1c357): __kmalloc_noprof+0x30b/0x410 ath12k_wmi_mac_phy_caps_parse+0x84/0x100 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_tlv_iter+0x5e/0x140 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_svc_rdy_ext_parse+0x308/0x4c0 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_tlv_iter+0x5e/0x140 [ath12k] ath12k_service_ready_ext_event.isra.0+0x44/0xd0 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_op_rx+0x2eb/0xd70 [ath12k] ath12k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x1f4/0x330 [ath12k] ath12k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x218/0x300 [ath12k] ath12k_pci_ce_workqueue+0x1b/0x30 [ath12k] process_one_work+0x219/0x680 bh_worker+0x198/0x1f0 tasklet_action+0x13/0x30 handle_softirqs+0xca/0x460 __irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x110 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 Free svc_rdy_ext.mac_phy_caps in the error case to fix this memory leak. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.4.1-00199-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 (CVE-2025-39890)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：bpf: Fix metadata_dst leak
    __bpf_redirect_neigh_v{4,6} Cilium has a BPF egress gateway feature which forces outgoing K8s Pod traffic to pass through dedicated egress gateways which then SNAT the traffic in order to interact with stable IPs outside the cluster. The traffic is directed to the gateway via vxlan tunnel in collect md mode. A recent BPF change utilized the bpf_redirect_neigh() helper to forward packets after the arrival and decap on vxlan, which turned out over time that the kmalloc-256 slab usage in kernel was ever-increasing. The issue was that vxlan allocates the metadata_dst object and attaches it through a fake dst entry to the skb. The latter was never released though given bpf_redirect_neigh() was merely setting the new dst entry via skb_dst_set() without dropping an existing one first. (CVE-2025-40183)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：mlxsw: spectrum_router: Fix neighbour use-after-free We sometimes observe use-after-free when dereferencing a neighbour [1]. The problem seems to be that the driver stores a pointer to the neighbour, but without holding a reference on it. A reference is only taken when the neighbour is used by a nexthop. Fix by simplifying the reference counting scheme. Always take a reference when storing a neighbour pointer in a neighbour entry. Avoid taking a referencing when the neighbour is used by a nexthop as the neighbour entry associated with the nexthop already holds a reference. Tested by running the test that uncovered the problem over 300 times. Without this patch the problem was reproduced after a handful of iterations. [1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88817f8e3420 by task ip/3929 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 3929 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-virtme-g36b21a067510 #3 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name:
    Nvidia SN5600/VMOD0013, BIOS 5.13 05/31/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x6e/0x300 print_report+0xfc/0x1fb kasan_report+0xe4/0x110 mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 mlxsw_sp_router_rif_gone_sync+0x35f/0x510 mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy+0x1ea/0x730 mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_port_vlan_event+0xa1/0x1b0
    __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_lag_event+0xcc/0x130 __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_event+0xf5/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_router_netdevice_event+0x1015/0x1580 notifier_call_chain+0xcc/0x150 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x7e/0x100 __netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x10b/0x210 netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x79/0xa0 vrf_del_slave+0x18/0x50 do_set_master+0x146/0x7d0 do_setlink.isra.0+0x9a0/0x2880 rtnl_newlink+0x637/0xb20 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x6fe/0xb90 netlink_rcv_skb+0x123/0x380 netlink_unicast+0x4a3/0x770 netlink_sendmsg+0x75b/0xc90
    __sock_sendmsg+0xbe/0x160 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b2/0x7d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0xfd/0x180 __sys_sendmsg+0x124/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [...] Allocated by task 109:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90
    __kmalloc_noprof+0x2c1/0x790 neigh_alloc+0x6af/0x8f0 ___neigh_create+0x63/0xe90 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_init+0x430/0x7e0 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_type_init+0x212/0x960 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_info_init.constprop.0+0x81f/0x1280 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_get+0x392/0x6a0 mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry_create+0x46a/0xfd0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_replace+0x1ed/0x5f0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work+0x10a/0x2a0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Freed by task 154:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
    __kasan_slab_free+0x43/0x70 kmem_cache_free_bulk.part.0+0x1eb/0x5e0 kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x1f2/0x260 kfree_rcu_work+0x130/0x1b0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Last potentially related work creation:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8c/0xa0 kvfree_call_rcu+0x93/0x5b0 mlxsw_sp_router_neigh_event_work+0x67d/0x860 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 (CVE-2025-68801)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Rocky Linux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1793370479公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：wifi: ath12k: Fix buffer overflow in debugfs If the user tries to write more than 32 bytes then it results in memory corruption. Fortunately, this is debugfs so it's limited to root users. (CVE-2025-38317)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：drm/xe/pf: Clear all LMTT pages on alloc Our LMEM buffer objects are not cleared by default on alloc and during VF provisioning we only setup LMTT PTEs for the actually provisioned LMEM range. But beyond that valid range we might leave some stale data that could either point to some other VFs allocations or even to the PF pages. Explicitly clear all new LMTT page to avoid the risk that a malicious VF would try to exploit that gap. While around add asserts to catch any undesired PTE overwrites and low-level debug traces to track LMTT PT life-cycle.
    (cherry picked from commit 3fae6918a3e27cce20ded2551f863fb05d4bef8d) (CVE-2025-38511)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：wifi: ath12k: fix memory leak in ath12k_service_ready_ext_event Currently, in ath12k_service_ready_ext_event(), svc_rdy_ext.mac_phy_caps is not freed in the failure case, causing a memory leak. The following trace is observed in kmemleak:
    unreferenced object 0xffff8b3eb5789c00 (size 1024): comm softirq, pid 0, jiffies 4294942577 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7b 00 00 10 ............{... 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 1f 38 00 00 .............8.. backtrace (crc 44e1c357): __kmalloc_noprof+0x30b/0x410 ath12k_wmi_mac_phy_caps_parse+0x84/0x100 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_tlv_iter+0x5e/0x140 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_svc_rdy_ext_parse+0x308/0x4c0 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_tlv_iter+0x5e/0x140 [ath12k] ath12k_service_ready_ext_event.isra.0+0x44/0xd0 [ath12k] ath12k_wmi_op_rx+0x2eb/0xd70 [ath12k] ath12k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x1f4/0x330 [ath12k] ath12k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x218/0x300 [ath12k] ath12k_pci_ce_workqueue+0x1b/0x30 [ath12k] process_one_work+0x219/0x680 bh_worker+0x198/0x1f0 tasklet_action+0x13/0x30 handle_softirqs+0xca/0x460 __irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x110 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 Free svc_rdy_ext.mac_phy_caps in the error case to fix this memory leak. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.4.1-00199-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 (CVE-2025-39890)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：bpf: Fix metadata_dst leak
    __bpf_redirect_neigh_v{4,6} Cilium has a BPF egress gateway feature which forces outgoing K8s Pod traffic to pass through dedicated egress gateways which then SNAT the traffic in order to interact with stable IPs outside the cluster. The traffic is directed to the gateway via vxlan tunnel in collect md mode. A recent BPF change utilized the bpf_redirect_neigh() helper to forward packets after the arrival and decap on vxlan, which turned out over time that the kmalloc-256 slab usage in kernel was ever-increasing. The issue was that vxlan allocates the metadata_dst object and attaches it through a fake dst entry to the skb. The latter was never released though given bpf_redirect_neigh() was merely setting the new dst entry via skb_dst_set() without dropping an existing one first. (CVE-2025-40183)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：mlxsw: spectrum_router: Fix neighbour use-after-free We sometimes observe use-after-free when dereferencing a neighbour [1]. The problem seems to be that the driver stores a pointer to the neighbour, but without holding a reference on it. A reference is only taken when the neighbour is used by a nexthop. Fix by simplifying the reference counting scheme. Always take a reference when storing a neighbour pointer in a neighbour entry. Avoid taking a referencing when the neighbour is used by a nexthop as the neighbour entry associated with the nexthop already holds a reference. Tested by running the test that uncovered the problem over 300 times. Without this patch the problem was reproduced after a handful of iterations. [1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88817f8e3420 by task ip/3929 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 3929 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-virtme-g36b21a067510 #3 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name:
    Nvidia SN5600/VMOD0013, BIOS 5.13 05/31/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x6e/0x300 print_report+0xfc/0x1fb kasan_report+0xe4/0x110 mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 mlxsw_sp_router_rif_gone_sync+0x35f/0x510 mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy+0x1ea/0x730 mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_port_vlan_event+0xa1/0x1b0
    __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_lag_event+0xcc/0x130 __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_event+0xf5/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_router_netdevice_event+0x1015/0x1580 notifier_call_chain+0xcc/0x150 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x7e/0x100 __netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x10b/0x210 netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x79/0xa0 vrf_del_slave+0x18/0x50 do_set_master+0x146/0x7d0 do_setlink.isra.0+0x9a0/0x2880 rtnl_newlink+0x637/0xb20 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x6fe/0xb90 netlink_rcv_skb+0x123/0x380 netlink_unicast+0x4a3/0x770 netlink_sendmsg+0x75b/0xc90
    __sock_sendmsg+0xbe/0x160 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b2/0x7d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0xfd/0x180 __sys_sendmsg+0x124/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [...] Allocated by task 109:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90
    __kmalloc_noprof+0x2c1/0x790 neigh_alloc+0x6af/0x8f0 ___neigh_create+0x63/0xe90 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_init+0x430/0x7e0 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_type_init+0x212/0x960 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_info_init.constprop.0+0x81f/0x1280 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_get+0x392/0x6a0 mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry_create+0x46a/0xfd0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_replace+0x1ed/0x5f0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work+0x10a/0x2a0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Freed by task 154:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
    __kasan_slab_free+0x43/0x70 kmem_cache_free_bulk.part.0+0x1eb/0x5e0 kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x1f2/0x260 kfree_rcu_work+0x130/0x1b0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Last potentially related work creation:
    kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8c/0xa0 kvfree_call_rcu+0x93/0x5b0 mlxsw_sp_router_neigh_event_work+0x67d/0x860 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 (CVE-2025-68801)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 主机上安装的一个程序包受到 USN-8886-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) 驱动程序；

    - 握手 API；

    - ARM32 架构；

    - ARM64 架构；

    - MIPS 架构；

    - OpenRISC 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - S390 架构；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 加密 API；

    - 英特尔 NPU 驱动程序;

    - Android 驱动程序；

    - 雷达斯块设备 （RBD） 驱动程序;

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 硬件随机数发生器核心；

    - TPM 设备驱动程序；

    - CPU 频率缩放框架；

    - 硬件加密设备驱动程序；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - FireWire 子系统；

    - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA)；

    - GPIO 子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - 硬件监控驱动程序；

    - CoreSight HW 跟踪驱动程序;

    - I2C 子系统；

    - IIO ADC 驱动程序；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - 输入设备核心驱动程序；

    - 输入设备（鼠标）驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - 多功能设备驱动程序；

    - Fastrpc 驱动程序；

    - Amazon Nitro Secure Module 驱动程序;

    - MMC 子系统；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 以太网绑定驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - Texas Instruments 网络驱动程序；

    - NTB 驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - NVMEM（非易失性内存）驱动程序；

    - Parport 驱动程序；

    - Pin 控制器子系统；

    - x86 平台驱动程序；

    - i.MX PM 域；

    - 系统重置/关闭驱动程序;

    - PTP 时钟框架；

    - 电压和电流调节器驱动程序；

    - S/390 驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO 驱动程序；

    - VME 总线暂存驱动程序;

    - 热驱动程序；

    - Thunderbolt 和 USB4 驱动程序；

    - TTY 驱动程序；

    - DesignWare USB2 驱动程序;

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - USB 主机控制器驱动程序；

    - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller 驱动程序；

    - USB 串口驱动程序；

    - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager 驱动程序；

    - vDPA 驱动程序；

    - Virtio Host (VHOST) 子系统；

    - Framebuffer 层；

    - 监视程序驱动程序；

    - 9P 分布式文件系统；

    - AFS 文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ceph 分布式文件系统；

    - EROFS 文件系统；

    - exFAT 文件系统；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - FUSE（Userspace 中的文件系统）；

    - 块设备的日志层 (JBD2)；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 客户端；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NTFS3 文件系统；

    - OCFS2 文件系统；

    - Proc 文件系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - 跟踪文件系统；

    - UDF 文件系统；

    - XFS 文件系统；

    - 密钥管理；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - 控制群组 (cgroup)；

    - Glob模式匹配库;

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - Mellanox 驱动程序；

    - Networking 核心；

    - 网络套接字；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - 蓝牙子系统；

    - 无线网络；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - Netfilter；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - TCP 网络协议；

    - XFRM 子系统；

    - RDMA verbs API；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - IPC 子系统；

    - 审计子系统；

    - 内核 CPU 基础架构；

    - Perf 事件；

    - Kernel exit() syscall；

    - Kernel fork() syscall；

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - 信号处理机制；

    - Timer 子系统；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - 可调整大小的哈希表库;

    - 内存管理；

    - 6LoWPAN网络协议;

    - 异步传输模式 (ATM) 子系统；

    - B.A.T.M.A.N. 网格协议；

    - 以太网桥接；

    - CAN 网络层；

    - Ceph Core 库；

    - Ethtool 驱动程序；

    - HSR 网络协议；

    - IEEE802154.4 网络协议；

    - IUCV 驱动程序；

    - KCM（Kernel Connection Multiplexor）套接字驱动程序；

    - IEEE 802.15.4 子系统；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - Open vSwitch；

    - 数据包套接字；

    - Phonet 协议；

    - 高通IPC路由器（QRTR）;

    - RDS 协议；

    - RxRPC 会话套接字；

    - SMC 套接字；

    - Sun RPC 协议；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - TLS 协议；

    - Unix 域套接字；

    - VMware vSockets 驱动程序；

    - X.25 network layer;

    - eXpress 数据路径；

    - AppArmor 安全模块；

    - 完整性度量架构 (IMA) 框架；

    - SELinux 安全模块；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - HD-audio 驱动程序；

    - QCOM ASoC 驱动程序；

    - 简单的音频多路复用器编解码器驱动程序;

    - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) 驱动程序；

    - SoC Audio for Freescale CPU 驱动程序；

    - Amlogic Meson SoC 驱动程序；

    - SOF 驱动程序；

    - NVIDIA Tegra ASoC 驱动程序;

    - USB 音频设备；

    - 表演工具;

    - KVM子系统;（CVE-2025-37807 ， ， ， CVE-2026-43022， CVE-2026-46321CVE-2026-53267CVE-2026-53160CVE-2026-53161CVE-2026-53136CVE-2026-53137CVE-2026-52994CVE-2026-53143CVE-2026-53138CVE-2026-53146CVE-2026-53147CVE-2026-53149CVE-2026-53156CVE-2026-53157CVE-2026-52947CVE-2026-53189CVE-2026-53184CVE-2026-53194CVE-2026-53195CVE-2026-53199CVE-2026-53202CVE-2026-53205CVE-2026-52943CVE-2026-53223CVE-2026-53209CVE-2026-53229CVE-2026-53253CVE-2026-53255CVE-2026-53268CVE-2026-53272CVE-2026-52942CVE-2026-53330CVE-2026-53329CVE-2026-53389CVE-2026-53388CVE-2026-53390CVE-2026-53387CVE-2026-53383CVE-2026-53381CVE-2026-53391CVE-2026-53366CVE-2026-53365CVE-2026-53362CVE-2026-53392CVE-2026-53356CVE-2026-52935CVE-2026-53397CVE-2026-63794CVE-2026-53402CVE-2026-63802CVE-2026-53401CVE-2026-63803CVE-2026-63805CVE-2026-46322CVE-2026-52923CVE-2026-63806CVE-2026-52917CVE-2026-52927CVE-2026-52929CVE-2026-53400CVE-2026-23265、 、 、 CVE-2026-64005CVE-2026-63869CVE-2026-63867CVE-2026-63870CVE-2026-63875CVE-2026-63879CVE-2026-63881CVE-2026-63884CVE-2026-63833CVE-2026-63909CVE-2026-63889CVE-2026-63913CVE-2026-63920CVE-2026-63925CVE-2026-63927CVE-2026-63930CVE-2026-63827CVE-2026-63954CVE-2026-63942CVE-2026-63968CVE-2026-63970CVE-2026-63971CVE-2026-63985CVE-2026-64002CVE-2026-63824CVE-2026-64004CVE-2026-64003CVE-2026-64009CVE-2026-64017CVE-2026-64023CVE-2026-64239CVE-2026-64222CVE-2026-64210CVE-2026-64242CVE-2026-64189CVE-2026-64188CVE-2026-64123CVE-2026-64243CVE-2026-64095CVE-2026-64036CVE-2026-64026CVE-2026-64245CVE-2026-63823CVE-2026-63817CVE-2026-64277CVE-2026-64272CVE-2026-64276CVE-2026-64266CVE-2026-64270CVE-2026-64271CVE-2026-64274CVE-2026-64279CVE-2026-63819CVE-2026-64273CVE-2026-63816CVE-2026-64246CVE-2026-63814CVE-2026-63812CVE-2026-63809、 、 、 CVE-2026-64418CVE-2026-64322CVE-2026-64323CVE-2026-64324CVE-2026-64318CVE-2026-64368CVE-2026-64333CVE-2026-64372CVE-2026-64374CVE-2026-64375CVE-2026-64378CVE-2026-64379CVE-2026-64317CVE-2026-64388CVE-2026-64380CVE-2026-64389CVE-2026-64395CVE-2026-64398CVE-2026-64401CVE-2026-64402CVE-2026-64312CVE-2026-64411CVE-2026-64403CVE-2026-64412CVE-2026-64413CVE-2026-64420CVE-2026-64443CVE-2026-64442CVE-2026-64440CVE-2026-64444CVE-2026-64436CVE-2026-64435CVE-2026-64432CVE-2026-64448CVE-2026-64430CVE-2026-64423CVE-2026-64422CVE-2026-64449CVE-2026-64304CVE-2026-64298CVE-2026-64532CVE-2026-64469CVE-2026-64524CVE-2026-64456CVE-2026-64463CVE-2026-64468CVE-2026-64496CVE-2026-64533CVE-2026-64299CVE-2026-64481CVE-2026-64296CVE-2026-64452CVE-2026-64287CVE-2026-64286CVE-2026-64283、 、 、 CVE-2026-68104CVE-2026-64563CVE-2026-64567CVE-2026-64568CVE-2026-64560CVE-2026-64574CVE-2026-64570CVE-2026-64576CVE-2026-64577CVE-2026-64578CVE-2026-64580CVE-2026-64581CVE-2026-64556CVE-2026-64583CVE-2026-64582CVE-2026-64584CVE-2026-64585CVE-2026-64599CVE-2026-64600CVE-2026-68091CVE-2026-64550CVE-2026-68097CVE-2026-68096CVE-2026-68098CVE-2026-68100CVE-2026-68106CVE-2026-68131CVE-2026-68129CVE-2026-68125CVE-2026-68140CVE-2026-68121CVE-2026-68119CVE-2026-68118CVE-2026-68141CVE-2026-68116CVE-2026-68108CVE-2026-68107CVE-2026-68142CVE-2026-64547CVE-2026-64545CVE-2026-68179CVE-2026-68153CVE-2026-68178CVE-2026-68145CVE-2026-68148CVE-2026-68149CVE-2026-68157CVE-2026-68189CVE-2026-64546CVE-2026-68155CVE-2026-64543CVE-2026-68143CVE-2026-64540CVE-2026-64539CVE-2026-64536、 、 、 CVE-2026-68329CVE-2026-68253CVE-2026-68255CVE-2026-68258CVE-2026-68245CVE-2026-68262CVE-2026-68260CVE-2026-68263CVE-2026-68266CVE-2026-68273CVE-2026-68284CVE-2026-68287CVE-2026-68236CVE-2026-68293CVE-2026-68290CVE-2026-68294CVE-2026-68297CVE-2026-68299CVE-2026-68314CVE-2026-68315CVE-2026-68222CVE-2026-68322CVE-2026-68320CVE-2026-68323CVE-2026-68326CVE-2026-68335CVE-2026-68373CVE-2026-68371CVE-2026-68370CVE-2026-68376CVE-2026-68354CVE-2026-68353CVE-2026-68352CVE-2026-68377CVE-2026-68348CVE-2026-68340CVE-2026-68338CVE-2026-68383CVE-2026-68219CVE-2026-68204CVE-2026-68402CVE-2026-68398CVE-2026-68401CVE-2026-68391CVE-2026-68392CVE-2026-68397CVE-2026-68400CVE-2026-68404CVE-2026-68216CVE-2026-68399CVE-2026-68202CVE-2026-68389CVE-2026-68199CVE-2026-68196CVE-2026-68192、 、 、 CVE-2026-72049CVE-2026-68446CVE-2026-68447CVE-2026-68451CVE-2026-68445CVE-2026-68453CVE-2026-68452CVE-2026-68454CVE-2026-68466CVE-2026-68467CVE-2026-68471CVE-2026-68474CVE-2026-68442CVE-2026-72005CVE-2026-68479CVE-2026-72009CVE-2026-72012CVE-2026-72019CVE-2026-72021CVE-2026-72024CVE-2026-68433CVE-2026-72035CVE-2026-72029CVE-2026-72036CVE-2026-72045CVE-2026-72051CVE-2026-72072CVE-2026-72067CVE-2026-72066CVE-2026-72089CVE-2026-72061CVE-2026-72057CVE-2026-72055CVE-2026-72099CVE-2026-72054CVE-2026-72053CVE-2026-72052CVE-2026-72102CVE-2026-68432CVE-2026-68419CVE-2026-72116CVE-2026-72110CVE-2026-72115CVE-2026-72107CVE-2026-72108CVE-2026-72109CVE-2026-72114CVE-2026-72117CVE-2026-68425CVE-2026-72113CVE-2026-68417CVE-2026-72105CVE-2026-68414CVE-2026-68409CVE-2026-68408、 、 、 CVE-2026-72233CVE-2026-72146CVE-2026-72148CVE-2026-72149CVE-2026-72144CVE-2026-72160CVE-2026-72157CVE-2026-72162CVE-2026-72164CVE-2026-72165CVE-2026-72170CVE-2026-72171CVE-2026-72136CVE-2026-72175CVE-2026-72172CVE-2026-72181CVE-2026-72195CVE-2026-72196CVE-2026-72197CVE-2026-72213CVE-2026-72135CVE-2026-72227CVE-2026-72225CVE-2026-72231CVE-2026-72232CVE-2026-72235CVE-2026-72261CVE-2026-72254CVE-2026-72253CVE-2026-72262CVE-2026-72252CVE-2026-72250CVE-2026-72247CVE-2026-72282CVE-2026-72244CVE-2026-72243CVE-2026-72242CVE-2026-72284CVE-2026-72133CVE-2026-72122CVE-2026-72330CVE-2026-72304CVE-2026-72314CVE-2026-72298CVE-2026-72301CVE-2026-72302CVE-2026-72312CVE-2026-72334CVE-2026-72123CVE-2026-72310CVE-2026-72121CVE-2026-72297CVE-2026-72120CVE-2026-72119CVE-2026-72118、 、 、 CVE-2026-72435CVE-2026-72373CVE-2026-72374CVE-2026-72375CVE-2026-72371CVE-2026-72382CVE-2026-72378CVE-2026-72389CVE-2026-72390CVE-2026-72397CVE-2026-72400CVE-2026-72404CVE-2026-72369CVE-2026-72406CVE-2026-72405CVE-2026-72409CVE-2026-72410CVE-2026-72416CVE-2026-72418CVE-2026-72419CVE-2026-72352CVE-2026-72423CVE-2026-72420CVE-2026-72425CVE-2026-72427CVE-2026-72438CVE-2026-72470CVE-2026-72469CVE-2026-72464CVE-2026-72476CVE-2026-72460CVE-2026-72459CVE-2026-72450CVE-2026-72478CVE-2026-72449CVE-2026-72444CVE-2026-72440CVE-2026-72480CVE-2026-72350CVE-2026-72343CVE-2026-74270CVE-2026-74256CVE-2026-74262CVE-2026-72485CVE-2026-72492CVE-2026-72502CVE-2026-74258CVE-2026-74281CVE-2026-72347CVE-2026-74257CVE-2026-72342CVE-2026-72483CVE-2026-72340CVE-2026-72338CVE-2026-72335、 、 、 CVE-2026-74378CVE-2026-74300CVE-2026-74312CVE-2026-74313CVE-2026-74297CVE-2026-74317CVE-2026-74314CVE-2026-74321CVE-2026-74330CVE-2026-74334CVE-2026-74338CVE-2026-74340CVE-2026-74296CVE-2026-74344CVE-2026-74341CVE-2026-74347CVE-2026-74349CVE-2026-74356CVE-2026-74359CVE-2026-74363CVE-2026-74295CVE-2026-74374CVE-2026-74365CVE-2026-74375CVE-2026-74377CVE-2026-74380CVE-2026-74446CVE-2026-74444CVE-2026-74443CVE-2026-74450CVE-2026-74438CVE-2026-74397CVE-2026-74390CVE-2026-74453CVE-2026-74388CVE-2026-74387CVE-2026-74385CVE-2026-74454CVE-2026-74294CVE-2026-74292CVE-2026-74481CVE-2026-74469CVE-2026-74479CVE-2026-74461CVE-2026-74465CVE-2026-74467CVE-2026-74471CVE-2026-74482CVE-2026-74293CVE-2026-74470CVE-2026-74289CVE-2026-74456CVE-2026-74288CVE-2026-74283CVE-2026-74282、 、 、 CVE-2026-74557CVE-2026-74512CVE-2026-74515CVE-2026-74516CVE-2026-74510CVE-2026-74519CVE-2026-74518CVE-2026-74522CVE-2026-74523CVE-2026-74527CVE-2026-74530CVE-2026-74531CVE-2026-74509CVE-2026-74534CVE-2026-74533CVE-2026-74535CVE-2026-74536CVE-2026-74537CVE-2026-74540CVE-2026-74544CVE-2026-74508CVE-2026-74549CVE-2026-74548CVE-2026-74550CVE-2026-74551CVE-2026-74563CVE-2026-74580CVE-2026-74579CVE-2026-74578CVE-2026-74581CVE-2026-74575CVE-2026-74574CVE-2026-74572CVE-2026-74582CVE-2026-74567CVE-2026-74565CVE-2026-74564CVE-2026-74583CVE-2026-74507CVE-2026-74496CVE-2026-74595CVE-2026-74589CVE-2026-74594CVE-2026-74586CVE-2026-74587CVE-2026-74588CVE-2026-74592CVE-2026-74597CVE-2026-74497CVE-2026-74590CVE-2026-74492CVE-2026-74584CVE-2026-74490CVE-2026-74488CVE-2026-74485、 、 、 CVE-2026-74649CVE-2026-74611CVE-2026-74612CVE-2026-74613CVE-2026-74610CVE-2026-74615CVE-2026-74614CVE-2026-74616CVE-2026-74621CVE-2026-74624CVE-2026-74625CVE-2026-74626CVE-2026-74609CVE-2026-74630CVE-2026-74628CVE-2026-74631CVE-2026-74632CVE-2026-74634CVE-2026-74635CVE-2026-74637CVE-2026-74608CVE-2026-74646CVE-2026-74641CVE-2026-74647CVE-2026-74648CVE-2026-74651CVE-2026-74669CVE-2026-74668CVE-2026-74667CVE-2026-74670CVE-2026-74666CVE-2026-74663CVE-2026-74662CVE-2026-74675CVE-2026-74661CVE-2026-74660CVE-2026-74656CVE-2026-74678CVE-2026-74607CVE-2026-74605CVE-2026-74696CVE-2026-74690CVE-2026-74695CVE-2026-74687CVE-2026-74688CVE-2026-74689CVE-2026-74692CVE-2026-74697CVE-2026-74606CVE-2026-74691CVE-2026-74604CVE-2026-74684CVE-2026-74603CVE-2026-74601CVE-2026-74598、 、 、 CVE-2026-80540CVE-2026-74720CVE-2026-74723CVE-2026-74724CVE-2026-74717CVE-2026-74726CVE-2026-74725CVE-2026-74730CVE-2026-74733CVE-2026-74736CVE-2026-74737CVE-2026-74739CVE-2026-74715CVE-2026-74744CVE-2026-74743CVE-2026-74746CVE-2026-74747CVE-2026-74748CVE-2026-74752CVE-2026-80521CVE-2026-74714CVE-2026-80527CVE-2026-80526CVE-2026-80528CVE-2026-80536CVE-2026-80541CVE-2026-80555CVE-2026-80554CVE-2026-80553CVE-2026-80556CVE-2026-80552CVE-2026-80551CVE-2026-80550CVE-2026-80557CVE-2026-80549CVE-2026-80548CVE-2026-80547CVE-2026-80558CVE-2026-74713CVE-2026-74710CVE-2026-80574CVE-2026-80568CVE-2026-80572CVE-2026-80560CVE-2026-80561CVE-2026-80565CVE-2026-80570CVE-2026-80576CVE-2026-74711CVE-2026-80569CVE-2026-74705CVE-2026-80559CVE-2026-74704CVE-2026-74701CVE-2026-74700、 、 、 CVE-2026-80585CVE-2026-80587CVE-2026-80589CVE-2026-80901CVE-2026-97509CVE-2026-80584CVE-2026-80721CVE-2026-80583CVE-2026-80586CVE-2026-80580CVE-2026-80579CVE-2026-80578

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - md/raid1：修复写入失败时的writes_pending和屏障引用泄漏 raid1_make_request（） 在调用 raid1_write_request（） 之前通过 md_write_start（） 获取writes_pending引用。raid1_write_request（） 中的多个失败路径完成 bio 并在未到达正常写入完成路径的情况下返回，从而导致跳过相应的 md_write_end（）。使 raid1_write_request（） 返回指示写入请求是否已成功排队的状态。这允许 raid1_make_request（） 在 raid1_write_request（） 失败时调用 md_write_end（）。此外，如果 wait_blocked_rdev（） 在 wait_barrier（） 成功后失败，则不会释放相关的屏障引用。请在从该路径返回之前调用 allow_barrier（） 以保持屏障核算平衡。（CVE-2026-72440）

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
365768	Ubuntu 26.04 LTS：Linux kernel (Azure) 漏洞 (USN-8888-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/10/14	2026/10/14	medium
365767	Ubuntu 26.04 LTS：Linux 内核漏洞 (USN-8887-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/10/14	2026/10/14	medium
374299	AlmaLinux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1793370479）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/30	2026/10/30	high
374300	Rocky Linux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1793370479）	Nessus	Rocky Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/30	2026/10/30	high
365457	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS：Linux (NVIDIA Tegra) 内核漏洞 (USN-8886-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/10/13	2026/10/13	high
365463	Ubuntu 26.04 LTS：Linux 内核 (OEM) 漏洞 (USN-8889-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2026/10/13	2026/10/13	medium
335628	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2026-72440	Nessus	Misc.	2026/8/15	2026/10/19	high

检测

插件搜索

medium

medium

high

high

high

medium

high