Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - xhci：如果无法访问 xhci，则阻止新命令排队 如果 xHC 被HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE标记为不可访问，则拒绝将命令环上的新命令排队。HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE在暂停和恢复中设置并清除。如果 xhci 被暂停且命令环上仍有待定命令，也会打印警告。（CVE-2026-97430）

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

AlmaLinux 9.2 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1793333110公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：dma-debug: don't call
    __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() under free_entries_lock __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() calls into printk -> serial console output (qcom geni) and grabs port->lock under free_entries_lock spin lock, which is a reverse locking dependency chain as qcom_geni IRQ handler can call into dma-debug code and grab free_entries_lock under port->lock. Move __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() call out of free_entries_lock scope so that we don't acquire serial console's port->lock under it. Trimmed-down lockdep splat: The existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (free_entries_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 dma_entry_alloc+0x38/0x110 debug_dma_map_page+0x60/0xf8 dma_map_page_attrs+0x1e0/0x230 dma_map_single_attrs.constprop.0+0x6c/0xc8 geni_se_rx_dma_prep+0x40/0xcc qcom_geni_serial_isr+0x310/0x510 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x110/0x244 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x54 handle_irq_event+0x50/0x88 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0xcc handle_irq_desc+0x28/0x40 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x24/0x30 gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x148 do_interrupt_handler+0xa4/0xb0 el1_interrupt+0x34/0x64 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 arch_local_irq_enable+0x4/0x8
    ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 ... -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 qcom_geni_serial_console_write+0x184/0x1dc console_flush_all+0x344/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 register_console+0x230/0x38c uart_add_one_port+0x338/0x494 qcom_geni_serial_probe+0x390/0x424 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 really_probe+0x148/0x280 __driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x114 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8
    __device_attach+0xe4/0x140 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0 device_add+0x538/0x668 of_device_add+0x44/0x50 of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x94/0xc8 of_platform_bus_create+0x270/0x304 of_platform_populate+0xac/0xc4 devm_of_platform_populate+0x60/0xac geni_se_probe+0x154/0x160 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 ... -> #0 (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}:
    __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc
    _printk+0x68/0x90 dma_entry_alloc+0xb4/0x110 debug_dma_map_sg+0xdc/0x2f8 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xac/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 [msm] msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0x38/0xac [msm] msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0x88 [msm] msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xde4/0x13ac [msm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe0/0x15c drm_ioctl+0x2e8/0x3f4 vfs_ioctl+0x30/0x50 ... Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> free_entries_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(free_entries_lock);
    lock(&port_lock_key); lock(free_entries_lock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace:
    dump_backtrace+0xb4/0xf0 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x1cc/0x234 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 consol ---truncated--- (CVE-2023-52516)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：USB: sisusbvga: Add endpoint checks The syzbot fuzzer was able to provoke a WARNING from the sisusbvga driver: ------------[ cut here]------------ usb 1-1: BOGUS urb xfer, pipe 3 != type 1 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 Modules linked in: CPU:
    1 PID: 26 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc5-syzkaller-00199-g5af6ce704936 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/12/2023 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event RIP:
    0010:usb_submit_urb+0xed6/0x1880 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:504 Code: 7c 24 18 e8 6c 50 80 fb 48 8b 7c 24 18 e8 62 1a 01 ff 41 89 d8 44 89 e1 4c 89 ea 48 89 c6 48 c7 c7 60 b1 fa 8a e8 84 b0 be 03 <0f> 0b e9 58 f8 ff ff e8 3e 50 80 fb 48 81 c5 c0 05 00 00 e9 84 f7 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000a1ed18 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX:
    0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff888012783a80 RSI: ffffffff816680ec RDI: fffff52000143d95 RBP: ffff888079020000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000 R10:
    0000000080000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: ffff888017d33370 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffff888021213600 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005592753a60b0 CR3: 0000000022899000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
    00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> sisusb_bulkout_msg drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:224 [inline] sisusb_send_bulk_msg.constprop.0+0x904/0x1230 drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:379 sisusb_send_bridge_packet drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:567 [inline] sisusb_do_init_gfxdevice drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:2077 [inline] sisusb_init_gfxdevice+0x87b/0x4000 drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:2177 sisusb_probe+0x9cd/0xbe2 drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusbvga.c:2869 ... The problem was caused by the fact that the driver does not check whether the endpoints it uses are actually present and have the appropriate types. This can be fixed by adding a simple check of the endpoints. (CVE-2023-54213)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress The test Davide added in commit ca22da2fbd69 (act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress) hangs our testing VMs every 10 or so runs, with the familiar tcp_v4_rcv -> tcp_v4_rcv deadlock reported by lockdep. The problem as previously described by Davide (see Link) is that if we reverse flow of traffic with the redirect (egress -> ingress) we may reach the same socket which generated the packet. And we may still be holding its socket lock. The common solution to such deadlocks is to put the packet in the Rx backlog, rather than run the Rx path inline. Do that for all egress -> ingress reversals, not just once we started to nest mirred calls. In the past there was a concern that the backlog indirection will lead to loss of error reporting / less accurate stats. But the current workaround does not seem to address the issue. (CVE-2024-26740)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：mm/vmscan: fix a bug calling wakeup_kswapd() with a wrong zone index With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling wakeup_kswapd(). > BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3 > #PF:
    supervisor read access in kernel mode > #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > PGD 0 P4D 0 > Oops:
    0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI > CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255 > Hardware name:
    QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 > RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812) > Code: (omitted) > RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS:
    00010286 > RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI:
    0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480 > RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff > R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14:
    0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940 > FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3:
    000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > PKRU: 55555554 > Call Trace: > <TASK> > ? __die > ? page_fault_oops > ? __pte_offset_map_lock > ? exc_page_fault > ? asm_exc_page_fault > ? wakeup_kswapd > migrate_misplaced_page > __handle_mm_fault > handle_mm_fault > do_user_addr_fault > exc_page_fault > asm_exc_page_fault > RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808 > Code: (omitted) > RSP:
    002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287 > RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0 > RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0 > RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08:
    0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 > R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000 > </TASK> (CVE-2024-26783)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：vfs: Don't evict inode under the inode lru traversing context The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that time, other processes will be stuck if they try getting these inodes (See function find_inode_fast), then the reclaiming process destroy the inodes by function dispose_list(). Some filesystems(eg. ext4 with ea_inode feature, ubifs with xattr) may do inode lookup in the inode evicting callback function, if the inode lookup is operated under the inode lru traversing context, deadlock problems may happen. Case 1: In function ext4_evict_inode(), the ea inode lookup could happen if ea_inode feature is enabled, the lookup process will be stuck under the evicting context like this: 1. File A has inode i_reg and an ea inode i_ea 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // i_ea is added into lru // lru->i_ea 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // i_reg is added into lru, lru->i_ea->i_reg prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(i_reg) spin_unlock(&i_reg->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file A i_reg->nlink = 0 iput(i_reg) // i_reg->nlink is 0, do evict ext4_evict_inode ext4_xattr_delete_inode ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all ext4_xattr_inode_iget ext4_iget(i_ea->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast
    __wait_on_freeing_inode(i_ea) ---- AA deadlock dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&i_ea->i_state) Case 2: In deleted inode writing function ubifs_jnl_write_inode(), file deleting process holds BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex while getting the xattr inode, which could race with inode reclaiming process(The reclaiming process could try locking BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex in inode evicting function), then an ABBA deadlock problem would happen as following: 1. File A has inode ia and a xattr(with inode ixa), regular file B has inode ib and a xattr. 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // ixa is added into lru // lru->ixa 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB PC echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // ib and ia are added into lru, lru->ixa->ib->ia prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate ixa->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(ib) spin_unlock(&ib->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file B ib->nlink = 0 rm file A iput(ia) ubifs_evict_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_write_inode(ia) make_reservation(BASEHD) // Lock wbuf->io_mutex ubifs_iget(ixa->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast
    __wait_on_freeing_inode(ixa) | iput(ib) // ib->nlink is 0, do evict | ubifs_evict_inode | ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ib) ubifs_jnl_write_inode ABBA deadlock -----make_reservation(BASEHD) dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&ixa->i_state) Fix the possible deadlock by using new inode state flag I_LRU_ISOLATING to pin the inode in memory while inode_lru_isolate(
    ---truncated--- (CVE-2024-45003)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Debian 12 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 DLA-4841 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian LTS 公告 DLA-4841-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org https://www.debian.org/lts/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2026 年 10 月 17 日 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux 版本： 6.1.190-1 CVE ID： CVE-2023-52629 CVE-2023-52676 CVE-2023-53231 CVE-2023-53336 CVE-2023-53353 CVE-2023-53429 CVE-2023-53491 CVE-2023-53538 CVE-2023-53574 CVE-2023-53627 CVE-2023-53762 CVE-2023-53851 CVE-2023-53857 CVE-2023-53999 CVE-2023-54227 CVE-2023-54233 CVE-2024-35887 CVE-2024-49568 CVE-2024-50017 CVE-2024-50029 CVE-2024-58097 CVE-2025-21649 CVE-2025-21651 CVE-2025-21759 CVE-2025-22039 CVE-2025-22103 CVE-2025-23129 CVE-2025-37833 CVE-2025-40074 CVE-2025-40097 CVE-2025-68190 CVE-2025-68736 CVE-2026-23191 CVE-2026-23447 CVE-2026-23448 CVE-2026-31420 CVE-2026-43088 CVE-2026-43198 CVE-2026-43288 CVE-2026-45897 CVE-2026-46090 CVE-2026-52944 CVE-2026-52988 CVE-2026-53005 CVE-2026-53078 CVE-2026-64210 CVE-2026-68097 CVE-2026-68161 CVE-2026-68236 CVE-2026-68286 CVE-2026-68287 CVE-2026-68288 CVE-2026-68289 CVE-2026-68391 CVE-2026-72334 CVE-2026-72402 CVE-2026-72413 CVE-2026-74268 CVE-2026-74289 CVE-2026-74294 CVE-2026-74334 CVE-2026-74474 CVE-2026-74496 CVE-2026-74521 CVE-2026-74565 CVE-2026-80521 CVE-2026-80671 CVE-2026-80689 CVE-2026-80833 CVE-2026-80834 CVE-2026-80912 CVE-2026-80914 CVE-2026-80928 CVE-2026-80930 CVE-2026-80931 CVE-2026-80932 CVE-2026-80938 CVE-2026-80941 CVE-2026-80944 CVE-2026-80949 CVE-2026-80951 CVE-2026-80952 CVE-2026-80963 CVE-2026-80964 CVE-2026-80965 CVE-2026-80966 CVE-2026-80967 CVE-2026-80968 CVE-2026-80969 CVE-2026-80971 CVE-2026-80972 CVE-2026-80973 CVE-2026-80976 CVE-2026-80977 CVE-2026-80978 CVE-2026-80982 CVE-2026-80983 CVE-2026-80987 CVE-2026-80988 CVE-2026-80992 CVE-2026-80994 CVE-2026-81000 CVE-2026-81001 CVE-2026-81002 CVE-2026-81003 CVE-2026-81005 CVE-2026-81007 CVE-2026-81008 CVE-2026-81017 CVE-2026-89440 CVE-2026-89444 CVE-2026-89456 CVE-2026-89457 CVE-2026-89458 CVE-2026-89461 CVE-2026-89463 CVE-2026-89464 CVE-2026-89469 CVE-2026-89470 CVE-2026-89471 CVE-2026-89474 CVE-2026-89475 CVE-2026-89476 CVE-2026-89477 CVE-2026-89478 CVE-2026-89479 CVE-2026-89480 CVE-2026-89481 CVE-2026-89482 CVE-2026-89483 CVE-2026-89485 CVE-2026-89487 CVE-2026-89488 CVE-2026-89489 CVE-2026-89490 CVE-2026-89491 CVE-2026-89493 CVE-2026-89494 CVE-2026-89495 CVE-2026-89496 CVE-2026-89497 CVE-2026-89498 CVE-2026-89504 CVE-2026-89508 CVE-2026-89510 CVE-2026-89511 CVE-2026-89512 CVE-2026-89515 CVE-2026-89524 CVE-2026-89525 CVE-2026-89532 CVE-2026-89533 CVE-2026-89538 CVE-2026-89540 CVE-2026-89541 CVE-2026-89542 CVE-2026-89548 CVE-2026-89549 CVE-2026-89551 CVE-2026-89554 CVE-2026-89555 CVE-2026-89557 CVE-2026-89559 CVE-2026-89560 CVE-2026-89562 CVE-2026-89563 CVE-2026-89565 CVE-2026-89569 CVE-2026-89573 CVE-2026-89575 CVE-2026-89576 CVE-2026-89579 CVE-2026-89582 CVE-2026-89583 CVE-2026-89585 CVE-2026-89586 CVE-2026-89587 CVE-2026-89594 CVE-2026-89595 CVE-2026-89596 CVE-2026-89597 CVE-2026-89599 CVE-2026-89604 CVE-2026-89605 CVE-2026-89606 CVE-2026-89607 CVE-2026-89608 CVE-2026-89609 CVE-2026-89615 CVE-2026-89616 CVE-2026-89617 CVE-2026-89621 CVE-2026-89626 CVE-2026-89627 CVE-2026-89628 CVE-2026-89634 CVE-2026-89636 CVE-2026-89640 CVE-2026-89643 CVE-2026-89649 CVE-2026-89650 CVE-2026-89653 CVE-2026-89655 CVE-2026-89656 CVE-2026-89662 CVE-2026-89663 CVE-2026-89665 CVE-2026-89669 CVE-2026-89674 CVE-2026-89684 CVE-2026-89694 CVE-2026-89696 CVE-2026-89697 CVE-2026-89699 CVE-2026-89704 CVE-2026-89706 CVE-2026-89710 CVE-2026-89711 CVE-2026-89712 CVE-2026-89720 CVE-2026-89723 CVE-2026-89724 CVE-2026-89725 CVE-2026-89726 CVE-2026-89729 CVE-2026-89730 CVE-2026-89732 CVE-2026-89733 CVE-2026-89736 CVE-2026-89741 CVE-2026-89742 CVE-2026-89744 CVE-2026-89746 CVE-2026-89749 CVE-2026-89751 CVE-2026-89752 CVE-2026-89753 CVE-2026-89756 CVE-2026-89765 CVE-2026-89776 CVE-2026-89777 CVE-2026-89778 CVE-2026-89779 CVE-2026-89780 CVE-2026-89781 CVE-2026-89782 CVE-2026-89783 CVE-2026-89784 CVE-2026-89785 CVE-2026-89786 CVE-2026-89787 CVE-2026-89789 CVE-2026-89792 CVE-2026-89796 CVE-2026-89816 CVE-2026-89817 CVE-2026-89818 CVE-2026-89821 CVE-2026-89822 CVE-2026-89823 CVE-2026-89824 CVE-2026-89843 CVE-2026-89845 CVE-2026-89846 CVE-2026-89847 CVE-2026-89849 CVE-2026-89850 CVE-2026-89851 CVE-2026-89852 CVE-2026-89853 CVE-2026-89854 CVE-2026-89855 CVE-2026-89856 CVE-2026-89858 CVE-2026-89861 CVE-2026-89863 CVE-2026-89864 CVE-2026-89865 CVE-2026-89870 CVE-2026-89871 CVE-2026-89872 CVE-2026-89876 CVE-2026-89877 CVE-2026-89878 CVE-2026-89879 CVE-2026-89880 CVE-2026-89881 CVE-2026-89883 CVE-2026-89887 CVE-2026-89888 CVE-2026-89890 CVE-2026-89891 CVE-2026-89892 CVE-2026-89893 CVE-2026-89894 CVE-2026-89895 CVE-2026-89896 CVE-2026-89897 CVE-2026-89901 CVE-2026-89922 CVE-2026-89923 CVE-2026-89924 CVE-2026-89925 CVE-2026-89926 CVE-2026-89927 CVE-2026-89930 CVE-2026-89932 CVE-2026-89936 CVE-2026-89937 CVE-2026-89939 CVE-2026-89945 CVE-2026-89946 CVE-2026-89947 CVE-2026-89948 CVE-2026-89949 CVE-2026-89951 CVE-2026-89952 CVE-2026-89953 CVE-2026-89954 CVE-2026-89957 CVE-2026-89959 CVE-2026-89964 CVE-2026-89965 CVE-2026-89968 CVE-2026-89969 CVE-2026-89970 CVE-2026-89973 CVE-2026-89979 CVE-2026-89980 CVE-2026-89982 CVE-2026-89983 CVE-2026-89984 CVE-2026-89988 CVE-2026-89989 CVE-2026-89992 CVE-2026-89993 CVE-2026-89997 CVE-2026-89998 CVE-2026-89999 CVE-2026-90000 CVE-2026-90003 CVE-2026-90007 CVE-2026-90011 CVE-2026-90015 CVE-2026-90017 CVE-2026-90018 CVE-2026-90019 CVE-2026-90020 CVE-2026-90025 CVE-2026-90031 CVE-2026-90032 CVE-2026-90033 CVE-2026-90034 CVE-2026-90049 CVE-2026-90053 CVE-2026-90054 CVE-2026-90055 CVE-2026-90056 CVE-2026-90057 CVE-2026-90058 CVE-2026-90060 CVE-2026-90062 CVE-2026-90063 CVE-2026-90067 CVE-2026-90068 CVE-2026-90070 CVE-2026-90071 CVE-2026-90072 CVE-2026-90073 CVE-2026-90074 CVE-2026-90075 CVE-2026-90078 CVE-2026-90081 CVE-2026-90088 CVE-2026-90090 CVE-2026-90091 CVE-2026-90092 CVE-2026-90102 CVE-2026-90103 CVE-2026-90107 CVE-2026-90108 CVE-2026-90110 CVE-2026-90114 CVE-2026-90122 CVE-2026-90124 CVE-2026-90126 CVE-2026-90128 CVE-2026-90140 CVE-2026-90141 CVE-2026-90143 CVE-2026-90151 CVE-2026-90157 CVE-2026-90160 CVE-2026-90176 CVE-2026-90180 CVE-2026-90184 CVE-2026-90185 CVE-2026-90186 CVE-2026-90188 CVE-2026-90189 CVE-2026-90190 CVE-2026-90194 CVE-2026-90196 CVE-2026-90198 CVE-2026-90202 CVE-2026-90203 CVE-2026-90207 CVE-2026-90209 CVE-2026-90214 CVE-2026-90216 CVE-2026-90218 CVE-2026-90219 CVE-2026-90221 CVE-2026-90222 CVE-2026-90223 CVE-2026-90224 CVE-2026-90225 CVE-2026-90226 CVE-2026-90228 CVE-2026-90245 CVE-2026-90248 CVE-2026-90249 CVE-2026-90251 CVE-2026-90253 CVE-2026-90254 CVE-2026-90255 CVE-2026-90257 CVE-2026-90274 CVE-2026-90281 CVE-2026-90283 CVE-2026-90284 CVE-2026-90285 CVE-2026-90286 CVE-2026-90287 CVE-2026-90290 CVE-2026-90292 CVE-2026-90293 CVE-2026-90294 CVE-2026-90295 CVE-2026-90296 CVE-2026-90297 CVE-2026-90298 CVE-2026-90302 CVE-2026-90303 CVE-2026-90307 CVE-2026-90309 CVE-2026-90314 CVE-2026-90316 CVE-2026-90318 CVE-2026-90319 CVE-2026-90327 CVE-2026-90329 CVE-2026-90334 CVE-2026-90341 CVE-2026-90348 CVE-2026-90352 CVE-2026-90353 CVE-2026-90354 CVE-2026-90357 CVE-2026-90360 CVE-2026-90361 CVE-2026-90362 CVE-2026-90372 CVE-2026-90378 CVE-2026-90382 CVE-2026-90386 CVE-2026-90388 CVE-2026-90391 CVE-2026-90393 CVE-2026-90394 CVE-2026-90395 CVE-2026-90403 CVE-2026-90411 CVE-2026-90413 CVE-2026-90414 CVE-2026-90415 CVE-2026-90416 CVE-2026-90419 CVE-2026-90420 CVE-2026-90431 CVE-2026-90434 CVE-2026-90435 CVE-2026-92476 CVE-2026-92477 CVE-2026-92481 CVE-2026-92494 CVE-2026-92496 CVE-2026-92498 CVE-2026-92501 CVE-2026-92504 CVE-2026-92507 CVE-2026-92508 CVE-2026-92509 CVE-2026-92510 CVE-2026-92511 CVE-2026-92512 CVE-2026-92514 CVE-2026-92521 CVE-2026-92522 CVE-2026-92523 CVE-2026-92524 CVE-2026-92525 CVE-2026-93037 CVE-2026-93039 CVE-2026-93040 CVE-2026-93041 CVE-2026-93046 CVE-2026-93048 CVE-2026-93049 CVE-2026-93050 CVE-2026-93051 CVE-2026-93052 CVE-2026-93053 CVE-2026-93054 CVE-2026-93055 CVE-2026-93056 CVE-2026-93061 CVE-2026-93063 CVE-2026-93064 CVE-2026-93067 CVE-2026-93073 CVE-2026-93095 CVE-2026-93098 CVE-2026-93102 CVE-2026-93103 CVE-2026-93108 CVE-2026-93109 CVE-2026-93110 CVE-2026-93114 CVE-2026-93115 CVE-2026-93117 CVE-2026-93118 CVE-2026-93120 CVE-2026-93130 CVE-2026-93131 CVE-2026-93136 CVE-2026-93137 CVE-2026-93138 CVE-2026-93140 CVE-2026-93141 CVE-2026-93142 CVE-2026-93145 CVE-2026-93149 CVE-2026-93151 CVE-2026-93152 CVE-2026-93158 CVE-2026-93159 CVE-2026-93160 CVE-2026-93161 CVE-2026-93165 CVE-2026-93167 CVE-2026-93170 CVE-2026-93177 CVE-2026-93178 CVE-2026-93182 CVE-2026-93183 CVE-2026-93185 CVE-2026-93188 CVE-2026-93189 CVE-2026-93190 CVE-2026-93191 CVE-2026-93203 CVE-2026-93204 CVE-2026-93206 CVE-2026-93210 CVE-2026-93213 CVE-2026-93214 CVE-2026-93219 CVE-2026-93222 CVE-2026-93226 CVE-2026-93234 CVE-2026-93236 CVE-2026-93242 CVE-2026-93245 CVE-2026-93247 CVE-2026-93252 CVE-2026-93256 CVE-2026-93261 CVE-2026-93262 CVE-2026-93264 CVE-2026-93268 CVE-2026-93271 CVE-2026-93274 CVE-2026-93278 CVE-2026-93279 CVE-2026-93280 CVE-2026-93281 CVE-2026-93283 CVE-2026-93286 CVE-2026-93287 CVE-2026-93288 CVE-2026-93781 CVE-2026-93782 CVE-2026-93783 CVE-2026-93784 CVE-2026-93785 CVE-2026-93787 CVE-2026-93788 CVE-2026-93789 CVE-2026-93795 CVE-2026-93797 CVE-2026-93798 CVE-2026-93800 CVE-2026-93802 CVE-2026-93803 CVE-2026-93805 CVE-2026-93806 CVE-2026-93807 CVE-2026-93808 CVE-2026-93810 CVE-2026-93811 CVE-2026-93812 CVE-2026-93813 CVE-2026-93814 CVE-2026-93815 CVE-2026-93816 CVE-2026-93819 CVE-2026-93820 CVE-2026-93821 CVE-2026-93822 CVE-2026-93824 CVE-2026-93825 CVE-2026-93826 CVE-2026-93830 CVE-2026-97407 CVE-2026-97408 CVE-2026-97411 CVE-2026-97413 CVE-2026-97415 CVE-2026-97416 CVE-2026-97417 CVE-2026-97418 CVE-2026-97419 CVE-2026-97420 CVE-2026-97421 CVE-2026-97427 CVE-2026-97430 CVE-2026-97434 CVE-2026-97435 CVE-2026-97436 CVE-2026-97437 CVE-2026-97438 CVE-2026-97439 CVE-2026-97440 CVE-2026-97441 CVE-2026-97442 CVE-2026-97444 CVE-2026-97445 CVE-2026-97446 CVE-2026-97448 CVE-2026-97449 CVE-2026-97450 CVE-2026-97451 CVE-2026-97452 CVE-2026-97453 CVE-2026-97454 CVE-2026-97455 CVE-2026-97456 CVE-2026-97472 CVE-2026-97475 CVE-2026-97476 CVE-2026-97481 CVE-2026-97482 CVE-2026-97483 CVE-2026-97484 CVE-2026-97485 CVE-2026-97486 CVE-2026-97487 CVE-2026-97488 CVE-2026-97489 CVE-2026-97490 CVE-2026-97491 CVE-2026-97492 CVE-2026-97495 CVE-2026-97497 CVE-2026-97502 CVE-2026-97506 CVE-2026-97507 CVE-2026-97508 CVE-2026-97509 CVE-2026-97510 CVE-2026-97516 CVE-2026-97517 CVE-2026-97523 CVE-2026-97524 CVE-2026-97539 CVE-2026-97540 CVE-2026-97541 CVE-2026-97556 CVE-2026-97557 CVE-2026-97564 CVE-2026-97568 CVE-2026-97572 CVE-2026-97573 CVE-2026-97576 CVE-2026-97581 CVE-2026-97582 CVE-2026-97592 CVE-2026-97596 CVE-2026-97598 CVE-2026-97601 CVE-2026-97604 CVE-2026-97608 CVE-2026-97611 CVE-2026-97612 CVE-2026-97899 CVE-2026-97904 CVE-2026-97905 CVE-2026-97909 CVE-2026-97910 CVE-2026-97920 CVE-2026-97921 CVE-2026-97922 CVE-2026-97923 CVE-2026-97925 CVE-2026-97926 CVE-2026-97927 CVE-2026-97930 CVE-2026-97931 CVE-2026-97940 CVE-2026-97948 CVE-2026-97951 CVE-2026-97952 CVE-2026-97954 CVE-2026-97957 CVE-2026-97958 CVE-2026-97959 CVE-2026-97963 CVE-2026-97964 CVE-2026-97969 CVE-2026-97970 CVE-2026-97973 CVE-2026-97977 CVE-2026-97979 CVE-2026-97981 CVE-2026-97982 CVE-2026-97986 CVE-2026-97987 CVE-2026-97991 CVE-2026-97993 CVE-2026-97995 CVE-2026-97998 CVE-2026-98006 CVE-2026-98008 CVE-2026-98009 CVE-2026-98010 CVE-2026-98011 CVE-2026-98012 CVE-2026-98013 CVE-2026-98014 CVE-2026-98015 CVE-2026-98016 CVE-2026-98017 CVE-2026-98022 CVE-2026-98023 CVE-2026-98025 CVE-2026-98027 CVE-2026-98030 CVE-2026-98031 CVE-2026-98046 CVE-2026-98055 CVE-2026-98063 CVE-2026-98064 CVE-2026-98066 CVE-2026-98068 CVE-2026-98069 CVE-2026-98070 CVE-2026-98071 CVE-2026-98072 CVE-2026-98074 CVE-2026-98075 CVE-2026-98076 CVE-2026-98077 CVE-2026-98078 CVE-2026-98080 CVE-2026-98088 CVE-2026-98089 CVE-2026-98090 CVE-2026-98091 CVE-2026-98092 CVE-2026-98094 CVE-2026-98095 CVE-2026-98096 CVE-2026-98098 CVE-2026-98104 CVE-2026-98108 CVE-2026-98113 CVE-2026-98116 CVE-2026-98121 CVE-2026-98123 CVE-2026-98128 CVE-2026-98129 CVE-2026-98130 CVE-2026-98154 CVE-2026-98157 CVE-2026-98158 CVE-2026-98159 CVE-2026-98160 CVE-2026-98167 CVE-2026-98169 CVE-2026-98171 CVE-2026-98172 CVE-2026-98181 CVE-2026-98185 CVE-2026-98186 CVE-2026-98187 CVE-2026-98188 CVE-2026-98189 CVE-2026-98190 CVE-2026-98191 CVE-2026-98194 CVE-2026-98195 CVE-2026-98196 CVE-2026-98197 CVE-2026-98199 CVE-2026-98201 CVE-2026-98202 CVE-2026-98203 CVE-2026-98204 CVE-2026-98205 CVE-2026-98207 CVE-2026-98208 CVE-2026-98209 CVE-2026-98210 CVE-2026-98213 CVE-2026-98217 CVE-2026-98221 CVE-2026-98227 CVE-2026-98233 CVE-2026-98234 CVE-2026-98236 CVE-2026-98237 CVE-2026-98238 CVE-2026-98239 CVE-2026-98241 CVE-2026-98246 CVE-2026-98247 CVE-2026-98249 CVE-2026-98251 CVE-2026-98252 CVE-2026-98253 CVE-2026-98255 CVE-2026-98257 CVE-2026-98260 CVE-2026-98262 CVE-2026-98264 CVE-2026-98272 CVE-2026-98275 CVE-2026-98276 CVE-2026-98282 CVE-2026-98283 CVE-2026-98287 CVE-2026-98290 CVE-2026-98298 CVE-2026-98299 CVE-2026-98300 CVE-2026-98301 CVE-2026-98302 CVE-2026-98303 CVE-2026-98306 CVE-2026-98308 CVE-2026-98311 CVE-2026-98312 CVE-2026-98314 CVE-2026-98319 CVE-2026-98320 CVE-2026-98322 CVE-2026-98323 CVE-2026-98325 CVE-2026-98326 CVE-2026-98328 CVE-2026-98331 CVE-2026-98339 CVE-2026-98340 CVE-2026-98342 CVE-2026-98343 CVE-2026-98344 CVE-2026-98345 CVE-2026-98347 CVE-2026-98348 CVE-2026-98349 CVE-2026-98351 CVE-2026-98352 CVE-2026-98354 CVE-2026-98357 CVE-2026-98358 CVE-2026-98359 CVE-2026-98360 CVE-2026-98362 CVE-2026-98363 CVE-2026-98367 CVE-2026-98368 CVE-2026-98369 CVE-2026-98370 CVE-2026-98374 CVE-2026-98378 CVE-2026-98379 CVE-2026-98380 CVE-2026-98381 CVE-2026-98383 CVE-2026-98388 CVE-2026-98398 CVE-2026-98402 CVE-2026-98404 CVE-2026-98406 CVE-2026-98407 CVE-2026-98410 CVE-2026-98413 CVE-2026-98416 CVE-2026-98417 CVE-2026-98419 CVE-2026-98421 CVE-2026-98422 CVE-2026-98423 CVE-2026-98426 CVE-2026-98428 CVE-2026-98429 CVE-2026-98430 CVE-2026-98432 CVE-2026-99999 CVE-2026-100070 CVE-2026-100071 CVE-2026-100075 CVE-2026-100078 Debian 缺陷：1108860

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于 Debian 12 bookworm，这些问题已在版本 6.1.190-1中修复。

    建议您升级 linux 程序包。

    如需了解 linux 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有关 Debian LTS 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://wiki.debian.org/LTS

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
350071	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2026-97430	Nessus	Misc.	2026/9/24	2026/11/4	high
374135	AlmaLinux 9.2 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.2：CLSA-2026：1793333110）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/30	2026/11/2	high
371759	Amazon Linux 2：内核 (ALASKERNEL-5.15-2026-119)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/24	2026/10/27	medium
351155	Debian dsa-6528：ata-modules-6.12.111+deb13-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/9/29	2026/9/29	high
362907	Debian dla-4817：ata-modules-6.12.107+deb12-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/10/4	2026/10/4	high
364137	Oracle Linux 10 / 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2026-500374)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/8	2026/10/8	high
373427	Amazon Linux 2：内核 (ALASKERNEL-5.10-2026-136)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/28	2026/10/28	medium
366919	Debian dla-4841：ata-modules-6.1.0-53-armmp-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2026/10/17	2026/10/17	high
365209	Amazon Linux 2023：bpftool6.12、kernel6.12、kernel6.12-devel （ALAS2023-2026-3193）	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/12	2026/11/2	medium
373463	Amazon Linux 2023：bpftool、kernel、kernel-devel (ALAS2023-2026-3336)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/29	2026/10/29	medium
365258	Amazon Linux 2023：bpftool6.18、kernel6.18、kernel6.18-devel (ALAS2023-2026-3192)	Nessus	Amazon Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/12	2026/10/29	high

检测

插件搜索

high

high

medium

high

high

high

medium

high

medium

medium

high