Azure Linux 3.0 安全更新内核 (CVE-2025-38334)
medium Nessus 插件 ID 295517
语言：
简介
远程 Azure Linux 主机缺少一个或多个安全更新。描述
远程 Azure Linux 3.0 主机上安装的内核版本低于 测试的版本。因此，该程序受到 CVE-2025-38334 公告中提及的一个漏洞影响。- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages. The longer story:
Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page->poison set in arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.
epc_page->poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was poisoned. This is bad because 1. we don't want that page to end up added to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down and the kernel to panic. Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including EWB which accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX memory. Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting both threads with HT.) The kernel will subsequently panic on the remaining cores seeing the core didn't enter MCE handler(s) in time. Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop it being considered for reclaiming. Testing epc_page->poison in sgx_reclaim_pages() would also work but I assume it's better to add code in the less likely paths. The affected EPC page is not added to &node->sgx_poison_page_list until later in sgx_encl_release()->sgx_free_epc_page() when it is EREMOVEd. Membership on other lists doesn't change to avoid changing any of the lists' semantics except for sgx_active_page_list. There's a TBD comment in arch_memory_failure() about pre-emptive actions, the goal here is not to address everything that it may imply. This also doesn't completely close the time window when a memory error notification will be fatal (for a not previously poisoned EPC page) -- the MCE can happen after sgx_reclaim_pages() has selected its candidates or even *inside* a microcode operation (actually easy to trigger due to the amount of time spent in them.) The spinlock in sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() is safe because memory_failure() runs in process context and no spinlocks are held, explicitly noted in a mm/memory-failure.c comment.
(CVE-2025-38334)
请注意，Nessus 尚未测试此问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。
解决方案
更新受影响的程序包。另见
插件详情
严重性: Medium
ID: 295517
文件名: azure_linux_CVE-2025-38334.nasl
版本: 1.1
类型: local
发布时间: 2026/1/22
最近更新时间: 2026/1/22
支持的传感器: Nessus
风险信息
VPR
风险因素: Medium
分数: 4.4
CVSS v2
风险因素: Medium
基本分数: 4.6
时间分数: 3.4
矢量: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
CVSS 分数来源: CVE-2025-38334
CVSS v3
风险因素: Medium
基本分数: 5.5
时间分数: 4.8
矢量: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
时间矢量: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
漏洞信息
CPE: p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-debuginfo, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-devel, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-gpu, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:python3-perf, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-docs, x-cpe:/o:microsoft:azure_linux, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-sound, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:bpftool, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-intree-amdgpu, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-accessibility, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-tools
必需的 KB 项: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/AzureLinux/release, Host/AzureLinux/rpm-list, Host/cpu
易利用性: No known exploits are available
补丁发布日期: 2025/8/12
漏洞发布日期: 2025/7/10
参考资料信息
CVE: CVE-2025-38334