CentOS Linux 8.5 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞 （CENTOS8.5：CLSA-2026：1773047921）
high Nessus 插件 ID 352370
语言：
简介
CentOS Linux 主机缺少一个或多个安全更新。描述
CentOS Linux 8.5 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare CENTOS8.5：CLSA-2026：2026：1773047921公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：asix: fix uninit-value in asix_mdio_read() asix_read_cmd() may read less than sizeof(smsr) bytes and in this case smsr will be uninitialized. Fail log: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in asix_mdio_read+0x3c1/0xb00 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] asix_check_host_enable drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:82 [inline] drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 asix_mdio_read+0x3c1/0xb00 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c:497 (CVE-2021-47101)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy() In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid intentionally writing across neighboring fields. Use flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they are always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves that can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler. We were doing:
#define ETH_HLEN 14 #define VLAN_HLEN 4 ... #define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN) ... struct mlx5e_tx_wqe *wqe = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi); ... struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg *eseg = &wqe->eth; struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe->data; ... memcpy(eseg->inline_hdr.start, xdptxd->data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE); target is wqe->eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being 2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start (really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into wqe->data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr (8 bytes). struct mlx5e_tx_wqe { struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; /* 0 16 */ struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; /* 16 16 */ struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[]; /* 32 0 */ /* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* last cacheline: 32 bytes
*/ }; struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg { u8 swp_outer_l4_offset; /* 0 1 */ u8 swp_outer_l3_offset; /* 1 1 */ u8 swp_inner_l4_offset; /* 2 1 */ u8 swp_inner_l3_offset; /* 3 1 */ u8 cs_flags; /* 4 1 */ u8 swp_flags; /* 5 1 */ __be16 mss; /* 6 2 */ __be32 flow_table_metadata; /* 8 4 */ union { struct { __be16 sz; /* 12 2 */ u8 start[2]; /* 14 2 */ } inline_hdr; /* 12 4 */ struct { __be16 type; /* 12 2 */ __be16 vlan_tci; /* 14 2 */} insert; /* 12 4 */ __be32 trailer; /* 12 4 */ }; /* 12 4 */ /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */ /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ }; struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg { __be32 byte_count; /* 0 4 */ __be32 lkey; /* 4 4
*/ __be64 addr; /* 8 8 */ /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */ /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ }; So, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer sizes. pahole shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe nor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. objdump -d shows no meaningful object code changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and optimizations). (CVE-2022-48744)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.
(CVE-2022-48827)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：virtio_net: fix xdp_rxq_info bug after suspend/resume The following sequence currently causes a driver bug warning when using virtio_net: # ip link set eth0 up # echo mem > /sys/power/state (or e.g. # rtcwake -s 10 -m mem) <resume> # ip link set eth0 down Missing register, driver bug WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 375 at net/core/xdp.c:138 xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x58/0x60 Call trace: xdp_rxq_info_unreg+0x58/0x60 virtnet_close+0x58/0xac
__dev_close_many+0xac/0x140 __dev_change_flags+0xd8/0x210 dev_change_flags+0x24/0x64 do_setlink+0x230/0xdd0 ... This happens because virtnet_freeze() frees the receive_queue completely (including struct xdp_rxq_info) but does not call xdp_rxq_info_unreg(). Similarly, virtnet_restore() sets up the receive_queue again but does not call xdp_rxq_info_reg(). Actually, parts of virtnet_freeze_down() and virtnet_restore_up() are almost identical to virtnet_close() and virtnet_open(): only the calls to xdp_rxq_info_(un)reg() are missing. This means that we can fix this easily and avoid such problems in the future by just calling virtnet_close()/open() from the freeze/restore handlers. Aside from adding the missing xdp_rxq_info calls the only difference is that the refill work is only cancelled if netif_running(). However, this should not make any functional difference since the refill work should only be active if the network interface is actually up. (CVE-2022-49687)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：ceph: avoid putting the realm twice when decoding snaps fails When decoding the snaps fails it maybe leaving the 'first_realm' and 'realm' pointing to the same snaprealm memory. And then it'll put it twice and could cause random use-after-free, BUG_ON, etc issues. (CVE-2022-49770)
请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。
解决方案
根据 TuxCare 公告 CENTOS8.5：CLSA-2026：1773047921 中的指南更新受影响的程序包。另见
插件详情
严重性: High
ID: 352370
文件名: tuxcare_centos_8.5_CLSA-2026-1773047921.nasl
版本: 1.1
类型: Local
代理: unix
发布时间: 2026/9/30
最近更新时间: 2026/9/30
支持的传感器: Continuous Assessment, Nessus Agent, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Self-Hosted Container Security, Nessus
风险信息
VPR
风险因素: High
分数: 7.9
百分位: 99.35
Vendor
Vendor Severity: Important
CVSS v2
风险因素: High
基本分数: 7.7
时间分数: 6
矢量: CVSS2#AV:A/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS 分数来源: CVE-2022-50386
CVSS v3
风险因素: High
基本分数: 8
时间分数: 7.2
矢量: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
时间矢量: CVSS:3.0/E:P/RL:O/RC:C
漏洞信息
必需的 KB 项: Host/OS/extended-third-party, Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/CentOS/release, Host/CentOS/rpm-list
可利用: true
易利用性: Exploits are available
补丁发布日期: 2026/3/9
漏洞发布日期: 2021/7/21
参考资料信息
CVE: CVE-2021-47101, CVE-2022-48744, CVE-2022-48827, CVE-2022-49687, CVE-2022-49770, CVE-2022-50386, CVE-2022-50422, CVE-2022-50432, CVE-2022-50470, CVE-2022-50496, CVE-2022-50551, CVE-2022-50673, CVE-2022-50865, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2023-53053, CVE-2023-53148, CVE-2023-53282, CVE-2023-53454, CVE-2023-53471, CVE-2023-53500, CVE-2023-53506, CVE-2023-53521, CVE-2023-53524, CVE-2023-53556, CVE-2023-53560, CVE-2023-53587, CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53604, CVE-2023-53619, CVE-2023-53622, CVE-2023-53680, CVE-2024-26610, CVE-2024-26739, CVE-2024-35791, CVE-2024-35896, CVE-2024-35937, CVE-2024-35965, CVE-2024-35966, CVE-2024-35967, CVE-2024-36921, CVE-2024-38538, CVE-2024-41042, CVE-2024-41069, CVE-2024-50040, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2025-22022, CVE-2025-37928, CVE-2025-38022, CVE-2025-38102, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38494, CVE-2025-38565, CVE-2025-38685, CVE-2025-39744, CVE-2025-39760, CVE-2025-39824, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39883, CVE-2025-39891, CVE-2025-39901, CVE-2025-39911, CVE-2025-39913, CVE-2025-39933, CVE-2025-39945, CVE-2025-40271, CVE-2025-40304, CVE-2025-68800, CVE-2026-23074
CLSA: 2026:1773047921