CentOS Linux 8.4 [TuxCare] 安全更新:bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞 (CENTOS8.4:CLSA-2026:1771078945)

high Nessus 插件 ID 361173

简介

CentOS Linux 主机缺少一个或多个安全更新。

描述

如 TuxCare CENTOS8.4:CLSA-2026:1771078945公告所述,CentOS Linux 8.4 主机上存在安装的程序包,该漏洞会受到多个漏洞的影响。

- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞:pid: take a reference when initializing `cad_pid` During boot, kernel_init_freeable() initializes `cad_pid` to the init task's struct pid. Later on, we may change `cad_pid` via a sysctl, and when this happens proc_do_cad_pid() will increment the refcount on the new pid via get_pid(), and will decrement the refcount on the old pid via put_pid(). As we never called get_pid() when we initialized `cad_pid`, we decrement a reference we never incremented, can therefore free the init task's struct pid early. As there can be dangling references to the struct pid, we can later encounter a use-after-free (e.g. when delivering signals). This was spotted when fuzzing v5.13-rc3 with Syzkaller, but seems to have been around since the conversion of `cad_pid` to struct pid in commit 9ec52099e4b8 ([PATCH] replace cad_pid by a struct pid) from the pre-KASAN stone age of v2.6.19. Fix this by getting a reference to the init task's struct pid when we assign it to `cad_pid`.
Full KASAN splat below. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN:
use-after-free in ns_of_pid include/linux/pid.h:153 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in task_active_pid_ns+0xc0/0xc8 kernel/pid.c:509 Read of size 4 at addr ffff23794dda0004 by task syz-executor.0/273 CPU: 1 PID: 273 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.12.0-00001-g9aef892b2d15 #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: ns_of_pid include/linux/pid.h:153 [inline] task_active_pid_ns+0xc0/0xc8 kernel/pid.c:509 do_notify_parent+0x308/0xe60 kernel/signal.c:1950 exit_notify kernel/exit.c:682 [inline] do_exit+0x2334/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:845 do_group_exit+0x108/0x2c8 kernel/exit.c:922 get_signal+0x4e4/0x2a88 kernel/signal.c:2781 do_signal arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:882 [inline] do_notify_resume+0x300/0x970 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:936 work_pending+0xc/0x2dc Allocated by task 0: slab_post_alloc_hook+0x50/0x5c0 mm/slab.h:516 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2907 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2915 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f4/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:2920 alloc_pid+0xdc/0xc00 kernel/pid.c:180 copy_process+0x2794/0x5e18 kernel/fork.c:2129 kernel_clone+0x194/0x13c8 kernel/fork.c:2500 kernel_thread+0xd4/0x110 kernel/fork.c:2552 rest_init+0x44/0x4a0 init/main.c:687 arch_call_rest_init+0x1c/0x28 start_kernel+0x520/0x554 init/main.c:1064 0x0 Freed by task 270:
slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1562 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x98/0x260 mm/slub.c:1600 slab_free mm/slub.c:3161 [inline] kmem_cache_free+0x224/0x8e0 mm/slub.c:3177 put_pid.part.4+0xe0/0x1a8 kernel/pid.c:114 put_pid+0x30/0x48 kernel/pid.c:109 proc_do_cad_pid+0x190/0x1b0 kernel/sysctl.c:1401 proc_sys_call_handler+0x338/0x4b0 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:591 proc_sys_write+0x34/0x48 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c:617 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1977 [inline] new_sync_write+0x3ac/0x510 fs/read_write.c:518 vfs_write fs/read_write.c:605 [inline] vfs_write+0x9c4/0x1018 fs/read_write.c:585 ksys_write+0x124/0x240 fs/read_write.c:658 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:670 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:667 [inline] __arm64_sys_write+0x78/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:667 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 [inline] el0_svc_common.constprop.1+0x16c/0x388 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:129 do_el0_svc+0xf8/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:168 el0_svc+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:416 el0_sync_handler+0x134/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:432 el0_sync+0x154/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:701 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff23794dda0000 which belongs to the cache pid of size 224 The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of 224-byte region [ff
---truncated--- (CVE-2021-47118)

- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞:i2c: i801: Don't generate an interrupt on bus reset Now that the i2c-i801 driver supports interrupts, setting the KILL bit in a attempt to recover from a timed out transaction triggers an interrupt. Unfortunately, the interrupt handler (i801_isr) is not prepared for this situation and will try to process the interrupt as if it was signaling the end of a successful transaction. In the case of a block transaction, this can result in an out-of-range memory access. This condition was reproduced several times by syzbot:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ed71512d469895b5b34e https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8c8dedc0ba9e03f6c79e https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c8ff0b6d6c73d81b610e https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=33f6c360821c399d69eb https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be15dc0b1933f04b043a https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b4d3fd1dfd53e90afd79 So disable interrupts while trying to reset the bus. Interrupts will be enabled again for the following transaction. (CVE-2021-47153)

- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞:scsi: target: Fix WRITE_SAME No Data Buffer crash In newer version of the SBC specs, we have a NDOB bit that indicates there is no data buffer that gets written out. If this bit is set using commands like sg_write_same --ndob we will crash in target_core_iblock/file's execute_write_same handlers when we go to access the se_cmd->t_data_sg because its NULL. This patch adds a check for the NDOB bit in the common WRITE SAME code because we don't support it. And, it adds a check for zero SG elements in each handler in case the initiator tries to send a normal WRITE SAME with no data buffer. (CVE-2022-21546)

- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞:net/mlx5e: IPoIB, Block PKEY interfaces with less rx queues than parent A user is able to configure an arbitrary number of rx queues when creating an interface via netlink. This doesn't work for child PKEY interfaces because the child interface uses the parent receive channels. Although the child shares the parent's receive channels, the number of rx queues is important for the channel_stats array: the parent's rx channel index is used to access the child's channel_stats. So the array has to be at least as large as the parent's rx queue size for the counting to work correctly and to prevent out of bound accesses. This patch checks for the mentioned scenario and returns an error when trying to create the interface. The error is propagated to the user. (CVE-2022-48883)

- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞:ath9k_htc: fix potential out of bounds access with invalid rxstatus->rs_keyix The rxstatus->rs_keyix eventually gets passed to test_bit() so we need to ensure that it is within the bitmap. drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common.c:46 ath9k_cmn_rx_accept() error: passing untrusted data 'rx_stats->rs_keyix' to 'test_bit()' (CVE-2022-49503)

请注意,Nessus 尚未测试这些问题,而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

解决方案

根据 TuxCare 公告 CENTOS8.4:CLSA-2026:1771078945 中的指南更新受影响的程序包。

另见

https://cve.tuxcare.com/els/releases/CLSA-2026:1771078945

http://www.nessus.org/u?7ee32e83

插件详情

严重性: High

ID: 361173

文件名: tuxcare_centos_8.4_CLSA-2026-1771078945.nasl

版本: 1.1

类型: Local

代理: unix

发布时间: 2026/10/1

最近更新时间: 2026/10/1

支持的传感器: Continuous Assessment, Nessus Agent, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Self-Hosted Container Security, Nessus

风险信息

VPR

风险因素: High

分数: 7.7

百分位: 99.03

Vendor

Vendor Severity: Important

CVSS v2

风险因素: Medium

基本分数: 6.8

时间分数: 5

矢量: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

CVSS 分数来源: CVE-2025-39955

CVSS v3

风险因素: High

基本分数: 7.8

时间分数: 6.8

矢量: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

时间矢量: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

漏洞信息

必需的 KB 项: Host/OS/extended-third-party, Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/CentOS/release, Host/CentOS/rpm-list

易利用性: No known exploits are available

补丁发布日期: 2026/2/14

漏洞发布日期: 2021/7/16

参考资料信息

CVE: CVE-2021-47118, CVE-2021-47153, CVE-2022-21546, CVE-2022-48883, CVE-2022-49503, CVE-2022-49581, CVE-2022-49674, CVE-2022-49770, CVE-2022-49799, CVE-2022-49826, CVE-2022-49865, CVE-2022-49870, CVE-2022-49907, CVE-2022-49917, CVE-2022-49934, CVE-2022-49948, CVE-2022-49975, CVE-2022-50030, CVE-2022-50050, CVE-2022-50084, CVE-2022-50085, CVE-2022-50093, CVE-2022-50103, CVE-2022-50164, CVE-2022-50185, CVE-2022-50200, CVE-2022-50220, CVE-2022-50243, CVE-2022-50252, CVE-2022-50279, CVE-2022-50403, CVE-2022-50406, CVE-2022-50497, CVE-2022-50706, CVE-2023-52578, CVE-2023-52594, CVE-2023-52764, CVE-2023-52835, CVE-2023-52864, CVE-2023-52885, CVE-2023-53000, CVE-2023-53039, CVE-2023-53075, CVE-2023-53077, CVE-2023-53084, CVE-2023-53090, CVE-2023-53111, CVE-2023-53116, CVE-2023-53117, CVE-2023-53145, CVE-2023-53153, CVE-2023-53259, CVE-2023-53305, CVE-2023-53307, CVE-2023-53432, CVE-2023-53484, CVE-2023-53513, CVE-2023-53668, CVE-2023-53673, CVE-2023-53676, CVE-2023-54015, CVE-2023-54072, CVE-2023-54102, CVE-2023-54148, CVE-2024-26610, CVE-2024-26872, CVE-2024-26958, CVE-2024-26961, CVE-2024-26974, CVE-2024-26982, CVE-2024-27395, CVE-2024-35855, CVE-2024-35886, CVE-2024-35937, CVE-2024-36921, CVE-2024-38538, CVE-2024-38555, CVE-2024-38586, CVE-2024-38627, CVE-2024-39487, CVE-2024-40978, CVE-2024-41042, CVE-2024-42120, CVE-2024-42292, CVE-2024-43830, CVE-2024-46815, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2025-37749, CVE-2025-37780, CVE-2025-37797, CVE-2025-37823, CVE-2025-37839, CVE-2025-37923, CVE-2025-37927, CVE-2025-38024, CVE-2025-38051, CVE-2025-38157, CVE-2025-38180, CVE-2025-38198, CVE-2025-38212, CVE-2025-38245, CVE-2025-38323, CVE-2025-38346, CVE-2025-38403, CVE-2025-38415, CVE-2025-38556, CVE-2025-38572, CVE-2025-38574, CVE-2025-38680, CVE-2025-38702, CVE-2025-38724, CVE-2025-38729, CVE-2025-39797, CVE-2025-39853, CVE-2025-39863, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39971, CVE-2025-40154, CVE-2025-40186, CVE-2025-40248, CVE-2025-40269, CVE-2025-68349

CLSA: 2026:1771078945