CentOS Linux 8.4 [TuxCare] 安全更新：bpftool / kernel / kernel-core / kernel-cross-headers / 等多个漏洞 （CENTOS8.4：CLSA-2024：1725872696）
high Nessus 插件 ID 366937
语言：
简介
CentOS Linux 主机缺少一个或多个安全更新。描述
CentOS Linux 8.4 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare CENTOS8.4：CLSA-2024：1725872696公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：tracing: Restructure trace_clock_global() to never block It was reported that a fix to the ring buffer recursion detection would cause a hung machine when performing suspend / resume testing. The following backtrace was extracted from debugging that case: Call Trace: trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0 __rb_reserve_next+0x237/0x460 ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x12a/0x3f0 trace_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x50 __trace_graph_return+0x1f/0x80 trace_graph_return+0xb7/0xf0 ? trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0 ftrace_return_to_handler+0x8b/0xf0 ? pv_hash+0xa0/0xa0 return_to_handler+0x15/0x30 ? ftrace_graph_caller+0xa0/0xa0 ? trace_clock_global+0x91/0xa0 ? __rb_reserve_next+0x237/0x460 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x12a/0x3f0 ? trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0x3c/0x120 ? trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x6b/0xc0 ? trace_event_raw_event_device_pm_callback_start+0x125/0x2d0 ? dpm_run_callback+0x3b/0xc0 ? pm_ops_is_empty+0x50/0x50 ? platform_get_irq_byname_optional+0x90/0x90 ? trace_device_pm_callback_start+0x82/0xd0 ? dpm_run_callback+0x49/0xc0 With the following RIP: RIP:
0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x69/0x200 Since the fix to the recursion detection would allow a single recursion to happen while tracing, this lead to the trace_clock_global() taking a spin lock and then trying to take it again: ring_buffer_lock_reserve() { trace_clock_global() { arch_spin_lock() {queued_spin_lock_slowpath() { /* lock taken */ (something else gets traced by function graph tracer) ring_buffer_lock_reserve() { trace_clock_global() { arch_spin_lock() { queued_spin_lock_slowpath() { /* DEAD LOCK! */ Tracing should *never* block, as it can lead to strange lockups like the above. Restructure the trace_clock_global() code to instead of simply taking a lock to update the recorded prev_time simply use it, as two events happening on two different CPUs that calls this at the same time, really doesn't matter which one goes first. Use a trylock to grab the lock for updating the prev_time, and if it fails, simply try again the next time. If it failed to be taken, that means something else is already updating it. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212761 (CVE-2021-46939)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：net: amd-xgbe: Fix skb data length underflow There will be BUG_ON() triggered in include/linux/skbuff.h leading to intermittent kernel panic, when the skb length underflow is detected. Fix this by dropping the packet if such length underflows are seen because of inconsistencies in the hardware descriptors. (CVE-2022-48743)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：nvme-rdma: fix possible use-after-free in transport error_recovery work While nvme_rdma_submit_async_event_work is checking the ctrl and queue state before preparing the AER command and scheduling io_work, in order to fully prevent a race where this check is not reliable the error recovery work must flush async_event_work before continuing to destroy the admin queue after setting the ctrl state to RESETTING such that there is no race .submit_async_event and the error recovery handler itself changing the ctrl state. (CVE-2022-48788)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：nvme-tcp: fix possible use-after-free in transport error_recovery work While nvme_tcp_submit_async_event_work is checking the ctrl and queue state before preparing the AER command and scheduling io_work, in order to fully prevent a race where this check is not reliable the error recovery work must flush async_event_work before continuing to destroy the admin queue after setting the ctrl state to RESETTING such that there is no race .submit_async_event and the error recovery handler itself changing the ctrl state. (CVE-2022-48789)
- 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：nvme: fix a possible use-after-free in controller reset during load Unlike .queue_rq, in .submit_async_event drivers may not check the ctrl readiness for AER submission. This may lead to a use-after-free condition that was observed with nvme-tcp.
The race condition may happen in the following scenario: 1. driver executes its reset_ctrl_work 2. -> nvme_stop_ctrl - flushes ctrl async_event_work 3. ctrl sends AEN which is received by the host, which in turn schedules AEN handling 4. teardown admin queue (which releases the queue socket) 5. AEN processed, submits another AER, calling the driver to submit 6. driver attempts to send the cmd ==> use-after-free In order to fix that, add ctrl state check to validate the ctrl is actually able to accept the AER submission. This addresses the above race in controller resets because the driver during teardown should:
1. change ctrl state to RESETTING 2. flush async_event_work (as well as other async work elements) So after 1,2, any other AER command will find the ctrl state to be RESETTING and bail out without submitting the AER. (CVE-2022-48790)
请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。
解决方案
根据 TuxCare 公告 CENTOS8.4：CLSA-2024：1725872696 中的指南更新受影响的程序包。另见
插件详情
严重性: High
ID: 366937
文件名: tuxcare_centos_8.4_CLSA-2024-1725872696.nasl
版本: 1.1
类型: Local
代理: unix
发布时间: 2026/10/18
最近更新时间: 2026/10/18
支持的传感器: Nessus Agent, Continuous Assessment, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Self-Hosted Container Security, Nessus
风险信息
VPR
风险因素: High
分数: 7.6
百分位: 98.48
Vendor
Vendor Severity: Important
CVSS v2
风险因素: Medium
基本分数: 6.8
时间分数: 5
矢量: CVSS2#AV:A/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS 分数来源: CVE-2024-42225
CVSS v3
风险因素: High
基本分数: 7.8
时间分数: 6.8
矢量: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
时间矢量: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
CVSS 分数来源: CVE-2024-41087
漏洞信息
必需的 KB 项: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/CentOS/release, Host/CentOS/rpm-list, Host/OS/extended-third-party
易利用性: No known exploits are available
补丁发布日期: 2024/9/9
漏洞发布日期: 2021/7/16
参考资料信息
CVE: CVE-2021-46939, CVE-2022-48743, CVE-2022-48757, CVE-2022-48788, CVE-2022-48789, CVE-2022-48790, CVE-2022-48796, CVE-2023-51779, CVE-2023-52340, CVE-2023-52486, CVE-2023-52530, CVE-2023-52619, CVE-2023-52622, CVE-2023-52623, CVE-2023-52707, CVE-2023-52811, CVE-2024-21803, CVE-2024-25739, CVE-2024-25742, CVE-2024-26614, CVE-2024-26668, CVE-2024-26669, CVE-2024-26698, CVE-2024-26704, CVE-2024-26733, CVE-2024-26772, CVE-2024-26773, CVE-2024-26925, CVE-2024-27397, CVE-2024-36883, CVE-2024-36940, CVE-2024-36960, CVE-2024-36978, CVE-2024-38552, CVE-2024-38570, CVE-2024-39471, CVE-2024-41087, CVE-2024-41090, CVE-2024-41091, CVE-2024-42154, CVE-2024-42161, CVE-2024-42225, CVE-2024-42228
CLSA: 2024:1725872696