远程 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS / 24.10 主机上安装的程序包受到 USN-7379-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - ARM64 架构；

    - MIPS 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - RISC-V 架构；

    - S390 架构；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 计算加速框架；

    - ACPI 驱动程序；

    - 驱动程序核心；

    - Ublk userspace block 驱动程序；

    - Virtio block 驱动程序；

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 缓冲区共享和同步框架；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - EFI 核心；

    - GPIO 子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - Microsoft Hyper-V 驱动程序；

    - 硬件监控驱动程序；

    - I3C 子系统；

    - IIO ADC 驱动程序；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - LED 子系统；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - Microchip PCI 驱动程序；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - STMicroelectronics 网络驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - PCI 子系统；

    - PHY 驱动程序；

    - Pin 控制器子系统；

    - x86 平台驱动程序；

    - i.MX PM 域；

    - 电源驱动程序；

    - 电压和电流调节器驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - i.MX SoC 驱动程序；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - UFS 子系统；

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - TDX Guest 驱动程序；

    - AFS 文件系统；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ceph 分布式文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - JFFS2 文件系统；

    - JFS 文件系统；

    - 网络文件系统库；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NILFS2 文件系统；

    - 文件系统通知基础设施；

    - Overlay 文件系统；

    - Diskquota 系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - DRM 显示驱动程序；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - VLAN 驱动程序；

    - KASAN 内存调试框架；

    - 内存管理；

    - StackDepot 库；

    - 蓝牙子系统；

    - LAPB 网络协议；

    - Netfilter；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - 控制群组 (cgroup)；

    - DMA 映射基础设施；

    - KCSAN 框架；

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - Seccomp 子系统；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - Workqueue 子系统；

    - KUnit 库；

    - CAN 网络层；

    - Networking 核心；

    - DCCP（数据报拥塞控制协议）；

    - HSR 网络协议；

    - IEEE802154.4 网络协议；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - NET/ROM 层；

    - 数据包套接字；

    - RDS 协议；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - SMC 套接字；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - 无线网络；

    - eXpress 数据路径；

    - SELinux 安全模块；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - Intel ASoC 驱动程序；

    - SOF 驱动程序；（CVE-2024-57921, CVE-2024-56614, CVE-2024-56558, CVE-2024-56589, CVE-2024-56662, CVE-2024-56610, CVE-2024-56717, CVE-2024-57890, CVE-2024-55639, CVE-2024-56562, CVE-2025-21633, CVE-2024-56598, CVE-2024-47794, CVE-2024-41935, CVE-2024-57901, CVE-2024-56587, CVE-2024-56581, CVE-2024-56783, CVE-2024-57888, CVE-2024-57809, CVE-2024-57926, CVE-2025-21650, CVE-2024-56634, CVE-2025-21639, CVE-2025-21656, CVE-2024-56578, CVE-2025-21632, CVE-2024-56784, CVE-2025-21644, CVE-2024-56776, CVE-2024-56764, CVE-2024-56652, CVE-2024-56550, CVE-2024-56569, CVE-2024-57904, CVE-2024-49569, CVE-2024-56770, CVE-2024-56606, CVE-2024-57806, CVE-2024-56646, CVE-2024-57895, CVE-2024-57880, CVE-2024-56650, CVE-2024-56591, CVE-2024-56590, CVE-2024-56642, CVE-2024-56713, CVE-2025-21663, CVE-2024-57938, CVE-2024-56760, CVE-2024-56583, CVE-2025-21662, CVE-2024-56629, CVE-2024-47408, CVE-2024-57850, CVE-2024-56777, CVE-2024-56626, CVE-2024-56773, CVE-2024-56647, CVE-2025-21664, CVE-2024-56564, CVE-2024-56597, CVE-2024-56623, CVE-2024-57897, CVE-2024-56670, CVE-2024-56567, CVE-2024-57931, CVE-2024-56761, CVE-2024-57935, CVE-2024-53690, CVE-2025-21640, CVE-2024-56608, CVE-2024-57878, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2024-57898, CVE-2024-57889, CVE-2024-56644, CVE-2024-56763, CVE-2024-57900, CVE-2024-56575, CVE-2024-56786, CVE-2025-21635, CVE-2024-56559, CVE-2024-56659, CVE-2024-56621, CVE-2024-57908, CVE-2024-52319, CVE-2024-43098, CVE-2024-57838, CVE-2024-56782, CVE-2025-21631, CVE-2024-36476, CVE-2025-21649, CVE-2024-56667, CVE-2024-49571, CVE-2024-55916, CVE-2024-57887, CVE-2024-56640, CVE-2024-57801, CVE-2024-57886, CVE-2024-56582, CVE-2024-56561, CVE-2024-56665, CVE-2024-57805, CVE-2024-51729, CVE-2024-57857, CVE-2024-57876, CVE-2024-57896, CVE-2024-57799, CVE-2024-57925, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-56664, CVE-2024-57913, CVE-2025-21660, CVE-2024-56596, CVE-2024-56671, CVE-2024-56595, CVE-2024-56781, CVE-2024-57912, CVE-2024-56638, CVE-2024-56636, CVE-2024-56669, CVE-2024-57945, CVE-2024-56633, CVE-2024-56605, CVE-2024-57882, CVE-2025-21652, CVE-2024-53179, CVE-2024-56599, CVE-2024-57892, CVE-2025-21647, CVE-2024-57910, CVE-2024-57792, CVE-2024-56768, CVE-2024-56711, CVE-2024-47143, CVE-2024-56577, CVE-2024-56574, CVE-2024-56765, CVE-2024-58087, CVE-2024-53685, CVE-2024-56787, CVE-2024-56592, CVE-2024-56368, CVE-2024-56615, CVE-2024-56712, CVE-2024-56648, CVE-2024-57874, CVE-2024-56653, CVE-2024-56656, CVE-2024-56641, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2025-21658, CVE-2024-56637, CVE-2024-56709, CVE-2024-57843, CVE-2024-56588, CVE-2024-57807, CVE-2024-57939, CVE-2024-56594, CVE-2024-55642, CVE-2024-57841, CVE-2024-50051, CVE-2024-56663, CVE-2024-56654, CVE-2024-56369, CVE-2024-57885, CVE-2024-56779, CVE-2024-56772, CVE-2024-56617, CVE-2024-56624, CVE-2024-56570, CVE-2024-56639, CVE-2025-21642, CVE-2024-56603, CVE-2024-56604, CVE-2024-57875, CVE-2025-21653, CVE-2025-21654, CVE-2024-56645, CVE-2024-56775, CVE-2024-52332, CVE-2024-48875, CVE-2024-41932, CVE-2024-57804, CVE-2025-21661, CVE-2024-57932, CVE-2024-53681, CVE-2024-56563, CVE-2024-56609, CVE-2024-57798, CVE-2025-21637, CVE-2024-57940, CVE-2024-56675, CVE-2024-56630, CVE-2024-56565, CVE-2024-54460, CVE-2024-56573, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2024-56715, CVE-2024-56632, CVE-2024-56622, CVE-2024-56673, CVE-2024-48881, CVE-2024-56593, CVE-2024-56620, CVE-2024-48876, CVE-2025-21643, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-57905, CVE-2024-57802, CVE-2024-56766, CVE-2024-57893, CVE-2024-57894, CVE-2024-57903, CVE-2024-57902, CVE-2024-57934, CVE-2024-57881, CVE-2024-56602, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-56580, CVE-2024-57899, CVE-2024-56759, CVE-2024-56586, CVE-2024-57839, CVE-2024-49568, CVE-2024-56660, CVE-2024-53687, CVE-2024-57907, CVE-2024-56601, CVE-2024-56767, CVE-2024-57916, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56566, CVE-2024-56643, CVE-2025-21638, CVE-2024-57879, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2024-56618, CVE-2024-56758, CVE-2024-56576, CVE-2024-57849, CVE-2024-56372, CVE-2024-45828, CVE-2024-57795, CVE-2024-56710, CVE-2024-56568, CVE-2024-56769, CVE-2025-21834, CVE-2024-56716, CVE-2024-56613, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56552, CVE-2025-21659, CVE-2024-57929, CVE-2024-57946, CVE-2025-21646, CVE-2024-56572, CVE-2024-55881, CVE-2025-21651, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2025-21634, CVE-2024-53682, CVE-2024-57872, CVE-2024-53680, CVE-2024-54680, CVE-2024-57918, CVE-2024-56780, CVE-2025-21636, CVE-2024-57906, CVE-2024-55641, CVE-2024-54455, CVE-2024-57919, CVE-2024-54683, CVE-2024-54193, CVE-2024-56635, CVE-2024-57933, CVE-2024-56611, CVE-2024-56551, CVE-2024-57883, CVE-2024-57793, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56600, CVE-2024-56651, CVE-2024-56714, CVE-2024-39282, CVE-2024-56627, CVE-2024-56649, CVE-2024-56579, CVE-2024-57791, CVE-2024-56774, CVE-2024-57944, CVE-2024-57911, CVE-2024-48873, CVE-2024-57884, CVE-2025-21629, CVE-2024-56778, CVE-2024-56619, CVE-2024-54191, CVE-2024-56771, CVE-2024-47141, CVE-2024-56757, CVE-2024-56718, CVE-2024-56655, CVE-2024-56607, CVE-2024-56785, CVE-2024-56625）

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 主机上安装的一个程序包受到 USN-7382-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - ARM64 架构；

    - MIPS 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - RISC-V 架构；

    - S390 架构；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 计算加速框架；

    - ACPI 驱动程序；

    - 驱动程序核心；

    - Ublk userspace block 驱动程序；

    - Virtio block 驱动程序；

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 缓冲区共享和同步框架；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - EFI 核心；

    - GPIO 子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - Microsoft Hyper-V 驱动程序；

    - 硬件监控驱动程序；

    - I3C 子系统；

    - IIO ADC 驱动程序；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - LED 子系统；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - Microchip PCI 驱动程序；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - STMicroelectronics 网络驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - PCI 子系统；

    - PHY 驱动程序；

    - Pin 控制器子系统；

    - x86 平台驱动程序；

    - i.MX PM 域；

    - 电源驱动程序；

    - 电压和电流调节器驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - i.MX SoC 驱动程序；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - UFS 子系统；

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - TDX Guest 驱动程序；

    - AFS 文件系统；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ceph 分布式文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - JFFS2 文件系统；

    - JFS 文件系统；

    - 网络文件系统库；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NILFS2 文件系统；

    - 文件系统通知基础设施；

    - Overlay 文件系统；

    - Diskquota 系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - DRM 显示驱动程序；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - VLAN 驱动程序；

    - KASAN 内存调试框架；

    - 内存管理；

    - StackDepot 库；

    - 蓝牙子系统；

    - LAPB 网络协议；

    - Netfilter；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - 控制群组 (cgroup)；

    - DMA 映射基础设施；

    - KCSAN 框架；

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - Seccomp 子系统；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - Workqueue 子系统；

    - KUnit 库；

    - CAN 网络层；

    - Networking 核心；

    - DCCP（数据报拥塞控制协议）；

    - HSR 网络协议；

    - IEEE802154.4 网络协议；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - NET/ROM 层；

    - 数据包套接字；

    - RDS 协议；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - SMC 套接字；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - 无线网络；

    - eXpress 数据路径；

    - SELinux 安全模块；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - Intel ASoC 驱动程序；

    - SOF 驱动程序；（CVE-2024-47794, CVE-2025-21653, CVE-2024-55642, CVE-2024-56580, CVE-2024-36476, CVE-2024-56623, CVE-2024-56773, CVE-2024-48873, CVE-2024-47141, CVE-2024-57910, CVE-2024-56759, CVE-2024-54460, CVE-2024-57839, CVE-2024-56625, CVE-2024-55916, CVE-2025-21664, CVE-2025-21652, CVE-2024-56624, CVE-2024-56574, CVE-2024-50051, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2024-56578, CVE-2024-56782, CVE-2024-57939, CVE-2024-57935, CVE-2024-56647, CVE-2024-57905, CVE-2024-57921, CVE-2024-56660, CVE-2025-21650, CVE-2025-21631, CVE-2024-56642, CVE-2024-56552, CVE-2024-57934, CVE-2024-56621, CVE-2024-57881, CVE-2024-41932, CVE-2024-56770, CVE-2024-57897, CVE-2024-56785, CVE-2024-56664, CVE-2024-57945, CVE-2024-57938, CVE-2024-56636, CVE-2024-56572, CVE-2024-43098, CVE-2024-56760, CVE-2024-57916, CVE-2024-56714, CVE-2025-21660, CVE-2024-57906, CVE-2025-21638, CVE-2024-53687, CVE-2024-56652, CVE-2024-51729, CVE-2024-49571, CVE-2024-57883, CVE-2024-54191, CVE-2024-56712, CVE-2024-49568, CVE-2024-57932, CVE-2024-57893, CVE-2024-56645, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-56641, CVE-2024-57802, CVE-2024-56775, CVE-2024-56627, CVE-2024-56638, CVE-2024-57929, CVE-2024-56615, CVE-2024-56566, CVE-2024-56620, CVE-2024-56577, CVE-2025-21656, CVE-2024-57887, CVE-2024-52319, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-57872, CVE-2024-56607, CVE-2024-56562, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21634, CVE-2024-56567, CVE-2024-56637, CVE-2025-21646, CVE-2024-57918, CVE-2024-56646, CVE-2024-57849, CVE-2025-21633, CVE-2025-21639, CVE-2024-56644, CVE-2024-56618, CVE-2024-56564, CVE-2024-56369, CVE-2024-56766, CVE-2024-56635, CVE-2024-57907, CVE-2024-56778, CVE-2024-57880, CVE-2024-57885, CVE-2024-56591, CVE-2024-56780, CVE-2024-57913, CVE-2024-54680, CVE-2025-21632, CVE-2024-54683, CVE-2025-21654, CVE-2024-58087, CVE-2024-56772, CVE-2024-56758, CVE-2024-57795, CVE-2025-21644, CVE-2024-56586, CVE-2024-56663, CVE-2024-56558, CVE-2024-57882, CVE-2024-56651, CVE-2024-56783, CVE-2024-53681, CVE-2024-57911, CVE-2024-57879, CVE-2024-56649, CVE-2024-56563, CVE-2024-56639, CVE-2024-56605, CVE-2024-57888, CVE-2024-56640, CVE-2024-57841, CVE-2024-56656, CVE-2024-48875, CVE-2024-48876, CVE-2024-57919, CVE-2024-57940, CVE-2024-56630, CVE-2024-53685, CVE-2024-56604, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-57889, CVE-2024-56619, CVE-2024-57806, CVE-2024-56583, CVE-2024-56715, CVE-2025-21640, CVE-2025-21662, CVE-2024-56662, CVE-2024-55639, CVE-2024-56711, CVE-2024-56372, CVE-2024-54455, CVE-2024-56771, CVE-2024-56368, CVE-2024-57892, CVE-2024-57843, CVE-2025-21636, CVE-2024-56650, CVE-2024-56613, CVE-2024-56716, CVE-2024-57793, CVE-2024-56634, CVE-2024-56595, CVE-2024-57878, CVE-2024-56598, CVE-2024-39282, CVE-2024-57908, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-56763, CVE-2024-56629, CVE-2024-56710, CVE-2024-56671, CVE-2024-56667, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57926, CVE-2025-21658, CVE-2024-56594, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-53179, CVE-2024-56587, CVE-2024-57946, CVE-2024-56717, CVE-2025-21635, CVE-2024-56779, CVE-2024-57944, CVE-2024-56767, CVE-2024-56781, CVE-2024-56765, CVE-2024-56609, CVE-2024-54193, CVE-2024-57804, CVE-2024-56599, CVE-2024-56602, CVE-2024-57901, CVE-2024-53680, CVE-2024-57801, CVE-2024-57912, CVE-2024-56606, CVE-2024-56579, CVE-2024-56588, CVE-2024-57895, CVE-2024-56601, CVE-2024-55641, CVE-2024-56559, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2025-21661, CVE-2024-57799, CVE-2024-57850, CVE-2024-57876, CVE-2024-47408, CVE-2024-57899, CVE-2024-56597, CVE-2024-57890, CVE-2024-56670, CVE-2024-56603, CVE-2024-56654, CVE-2025-21834, CVE-2024-56590, CVE-2024-49569, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2024-56659, CVE-2024-56596, CVE-2025-21642, CVE-2025-21663, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2024-56614, CVE-2024-56673, CVE-2024-56787, CVE-2024-56713, CVE-2024-56573, CVE-2024-56589, CVE-2024-56764, CVE-2024-56655, CVE-2024-56617, CVE-2024-56669, CVE-2024-56576, CVE-2024-57792, CVE-2024-57904, CVE-2024-52332, CVE-2024-57900, CVE-2024-57933, CVE-2024-55881, CVE-2024-56626, CVE-2024-57894, CVE-2024-56582, CVE-2024-57838, CVE-2025-21629, CVE-2025-21659, CVE-2024-57809, CVE-2024-47143, CVE-2024-57925, CVE-2024-41935, CVE-2025-21649, CVE-2024-57884, CVE-2024-57875, CVE-2025-21647, CVE-2024-56581, CVE-2024-57886, CVE-2024-57896, CVE-2025-21651, CVE-2024-56611, CVE-2024-56575, CVE-2024-57807, CVE-2024-56561, CVE-2024-53690, CVE-2024-56761, CVE-2024-57902, CVE-2024-56600, CVE-2024-56593, CVE-2024-57805, CVE-2024-56568, CVE-2024-56632, CVE-2024-56622, CVE-2025-21637, CVE-2024-45828, CVE-2024-56709, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2025-21643, CVE-2024-56786, CVE-2024-56565, CVE-2024-57903, CVE-2024-56592, CVE-2024-56569, CVE-2024-56718, CVE-2024-57791, CVE-2024-56665, CVE-2024-56774, CVE-2024-56608, CVE-2024-56643, CVE-2024-57931, CVE-2024-57857, CVE-2024-56777, CVE-2024-53682, CVE-2024-56648, CVE-2024-56769, CVE-2024-48881, CVE-2024-56776, CVE-2024-57798, CVE-2024-57874, CVE-2024-56633, CVE-2024-56768, CVE-2024-56653, CVE-2024-56784, CVE-2024-56550, CVE-2024-56610, CVE-2024-56570, CVE-2024-56675, CVE-2024-57898, CVE-2024-56551）

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Rocky Linux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1791800936公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：kunit: Fix potential null dereference in kunit_device_driver_test() kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without NULL check may lead to NULL dereference. Add a NULL check for test_state. (CVE-2024-56773)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：arm64: ptrace: fix partial SETREGSET for NT_ARM_FPMR Currently fpmr_set() doesn't initialize the temporary 'fpmr' variable, and a SETREGSET call with a length of zero will leave this uninitialized. Consequently an arbitrary value will be written back to target->thread.uw.fpmr, potentially leaking up to 64 bits of memory from the kernel stack. The read is limited to a specific slot on the stack, and the issue does not provide a write mechanism. Fix this by initializing the temporary value before copying the regset from userspace, as for other regsets (e.g. NT_PRSTATUS, NT_PRFPREG, NT_ARM_SYSTEM_CALL). In the case of a zero-length write, the existing contents of FPMR will be retained. Before this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0xffff800083963d50 After this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d (CVE-2024-57878)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：mptcp: fix 'scheduling while atomic' in mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr If multiple connection requests attempt to create an implicit mptcp endpoint in parallel, more than one caller may end up in mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr because none found the address in local_addr_list during their call to mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id. In this case, the concurrent new_local_addr calls may delete the address entry created by the previous caller. These deletes use synchronize_rcu, but this is not permitted in some of the contexts where this function may be called.
    During packet recv, the caller may be in a rcu read critical section and have preemption disabled. An example stack: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/2/0/0x00000302 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117 (discriminator 1)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:124) __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:5943) schedule_debug.constprop.0 (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:33 kernel/sched/core.c:5970) __schedule (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 include/linux/jump_label.h:207 kernel/sched/features.h:29 kernel/sched/core.c:6621) schedule (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 kernel/sched/core.c:6804 kernel/sched/core.c:6818) schedule_timeout (kernel/time/timer.c:2160) wait_for_completion (kernel/sched/completion.c:96 kernel/sched/completion.c:116 kernel/sched/completion.c:127 kernel/sched/completion.c:148) __wait_rcu_gp (include/linux/rcupdate.h:311 kernel/rcu/update.c:444) synchronize_rcu (kernel/rcu/tree.c:3609) mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr (net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:966 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1061) mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id (net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1164) mptcp_pm_get_local_id (net/mptcp/pm.c:420) subflow_check_req (net/mptcp/subflow.c:98 net/mptcp/subflow.c:213) subflow_v4_route_req (net/mptcp/subflow.c:305) tcp_conn_request (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7216) subflow_v4_conn_request (net/mptcp/subflow.c:651) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6709) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934) tcp_v4_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2334) ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 (discriminator 1)) ip_local_deliver_finish (include/linux/rcupdate.h:813 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234) ip_local_deliver (include/linux/netfilter.h:314 include/linux/netfilter.h:308 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254) ip_sublist_rcv_finish (include/net/dst.h:461 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:580) ip_sublist_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:640) ip_list_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:675) __netif_receive_skb_list_core (net/core/dev.c:5583 net/core/dev.c:5631) netif_receive_skb_list_internal (net/core/dev.c:5685 net/core/dev.c:5774) napi_complete_done (include/linux/list.h:37 include/net/gro.h:449 include/net/gro.h:444 net/core/dev.c:6114) igb_poll (drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:8244) igb
    __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:6582) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:6653 net/core/dev.c:6787) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:553) __irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:588 kernel/softirq.c:427 kernel/softirq.c:636) irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:651) common_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 (discriminator 14)) </IRQ> This problem seems particularly prevalent if the user advertises an endpoint that has a different external vs internal address. In the case where the external address is advertised and multiple connections already exist, multiple subflow SYNs arrive in parallel which tends to trigger the race during creation of the first local_addr_list entries which have the internal address instead. Fix by skipping the replacement of an existing implicit local address if called via mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id. (CVE-2025-21938)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：devlink: fix xa_alloc_cyclic() error handling In case of returning 1 from xa_alloc_cyclic() (wrapping) ERR_PTR(1) will be returned, which will cause IS_ERR() to be false. Which can lead to dereference not allocated pointer (rel). Fix it by checking if err is lower than zero. This wasn't found in real usecase, only noticed. Credit to Pierre.
    (CVE-2025-22017)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：drm/xe: Use local fence in error path of xe_migrate_clear The intent of the error path in xe_migrate_clear is to wait on locally generated fence and then return. The code is waiting on m->fence which could be the local fence but this is only stable under the job mutex leading to a possible UAF. Fix code to wait on local fence. (cherry picked from commit 762b7e95362170b3e13a8704f38d5e47eca4ba74) (CVE-2025-37869)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Ubuntu 24.10 主机上安装的程序包受到 USN-7380-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - ARM64 架构；

    - MIPS 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - RISC-V 架构；

    - S390 架构；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 计算加速框架；

    - ACPI 驱动程序；

    - 驱动程序核心；

    - Ublk userspace block 驱动程序；

    - Virtio block 驱动程序；

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 缓冲区共享和同步框架；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - EFI 核心；

    - GPIO 子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - Microsoft Hyper-V 驱动程序；

    - 硬件监控驱动程序；

    - I3C 子系统；

    - IIO ADC 驱动程序；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - LED 子系统；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - Microchip PCI 驱动程序；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - STMicroelectronics 网络驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - PCI 子系统；

    - PHY 驱动程序；

    - Pin 控制器子系统；

    - x86 平台驱动程序；

    - i.MX PM 域；

    - 电源驱动程序；

    - 电压和电流调节器驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - i.MX SoC 驱动程序；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - UFS 子系统；

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - TDX Guest 驱动程序；

    - AFS 文件系统；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ceph 分布式文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - JFFS2 文件系统；

    - JFS 文件系统；

    - 网络文件系统库；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NILFS2 文件系统；

    - 文件系统通知基础设施；

    - Overlay 文件系统；

    - Diskquota 系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - DRM 显示驱动程序；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - VLAN 驱动程序；

    - KASAN 内存调试框架；

    - 内存管理；

    - StackDepot 库；

    - 蓝牙子系统；

    - LAPB 网络协议；

    - 网络命名空间；

    - Netfilter；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - 控制群组 (cgroup)；

    - DMA 映射基础设施；

    - KCSAN 框架；

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - Seccomp 子系统；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - Workqueue 子系统；

    - KUnit 库；

    - CAN 网络层；

    - Networking 核心；

    - DCCP（数据报拥塞控制协议）；

    - HSR 网络协议；

    - IEEE802154.4 网络协议；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - NET/ROM 层；

    - 数据包套接字；

    - RDS 协议；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - SMC 套接字；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - 无线网络；

    - eXpress 数据路径；

    - SELinux 安全模块；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - Intel ASoC 驱动程序；

    - SOF 驱动程序；(CVE-2024-57850, CVE-2024-57895, CVE-2024-57843, CVE-2024-56587, CVE-2024-56590, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56673, CVE-2024-56552, CVE-2024-56644, CVE-2024-57940, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-56784, CVE-2024-57935, CVE-2024-56561, CVE-2025-21642, CVE-2024-56573, CVE-2024-53682, CVE-2024-39282, CVE-2024-56653, CVE-2024-56606, CVE-2024-56651, CVE-2024-56608, CVE-2024-56649, CVE-2024-56761, CVE-2024-57921, CVE-2024-57804, CVE-2024-57902, CVE-2024-56630, CVE-2024-56769, CVE-2024-56782, CVE-2025-21652, CVE-2025-21634, CVE-2024-48881, CVE-2024-41935, CVE-2024-57912, CVE-2024-56659, CVE-2025-21663, CVE-2024-57857, CVE-2024-56670, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-52319, CVE-2024-56637, CVE-2024-56643, CVE-2025-21643, CVE-2024-55881, CVE-2024-56619, CVE-2024-53687, CVE-2025-21654, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2024-56648, CVE-2024-57893, CVE-2025-21651, CVE-2024-57939, CVE-2024-56622, CVE-2024-56763, CVE-2024-56591, CVE-2024-56559, CVE-2024-57883, CVE-2024-56592, CVE-2024-57795, CVE-2024-56578, CVE-2024-56780, CVE-2024-57904, CVE-2024-57934, CVE-2024-56369, CVE-2024-57931, CVE-2024-47408, CVE-2025-21644, CVE-2024-56625, CVE-2025-21659, CVE-2024-56640, CVE-2024-56605, CVE-2024-56638, CVE-2024-56775, CVE-2024-47141, CVE-2024-56773, CVE-2024-53681, CVE-2024-57802, CVE-2024-56550, CVE-2024-56717, CVE-2025-21662, CVE-2024-53685, CVE-2024-57890, CVE-2024-56765, CVE-2025-21629, CVE-2024-57918, CVE-2024-57841, CVE-2024-57894, CVE-2025-21649, CVE-2024-56613, CVE-2024-56611, CVE-2024-57946, CVE-2024-57908, CVE-2024-57900, CVE-2024-56665, CVE-2024-56786, CVE-2024-56778, CVE-2024-56627, CVE-2024-56712, CVE-2024-52332, CVE-2025-21834, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2024-56595, CVE-2024-56623, CVE-2024-57807, CVE-2024-41932, CVE-2024-57809, CVE-2024-54193, CVE-2025-21637, CVE-2024-54455, CVE-2024-56565, CVE-2024-57849, CVE-2024-56647, CVE-2024-57896, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57944, CVE-2024-56711, CVE-2024-57881, CVE-2024-56614, CVE-2024-54460, CVE-2024-56563, CVE-2024-58087, CVE-2024-57798, CVE-2024-56615, CVE-2024-53179, CVE-2024-57919, CVE-2024-56580, CVE-2024-56771, CVE-2024-56572, CVE-2024-56581, CVE-2024-56586, CVE-2024-56654, CVE-2024-57916, CVE-2024-56645, CVE-2024-56672, CVE-2024-56597, CVE-2024-56671, CVE-2024-56658, CVE-2024-56634, CVE-2024-49568, CVE-2024-56588, CVE-2024-56655, CVE-2024-48876, CVE-2024-57889, CVE-2025-21647, CVE-2024-47794, CVE-2024-57938, CVE-2024-56767, CVE-2025-21664, CVE-2024-56656, CVE-2024-56787, CVE-2024-57925, CVE-2024-57876, CVE-2024-57874, CVE-2024-56766, CVE-2024-57878, CVE-2024-57898, CVE-2024-56617, CVE-2024-56604, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2024-56551, CVE-2024-57892, CVE-2024-49571, CVE-2024-45828, CVE-2024-57911, CVE-2025-21660, CVE-2024-56558, CVE-2024-57805, CVE-2024-53680, CVE-2024-57839, CVE-2024-56626, CVE-2024-57901, CVE-2024-56636, CVE-2024-56646, CVE-2024-56667, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2024-56660, CVE-2024-56368, CVE-2024-56600, CVE-2024-57793, CVE-2024-36476, CVE-2024-56610, CVE-2024-57888, CVE-2024-57886, CVE-2024-57885, CVE-2024-56776, CVE-2025-21635, CVE-2025-21661, CVE-2024-56576, CVE-2024-56662, CVE-2024-56589, CVE-2024-57806, CVE-2024-57887, CVE-2025-21650, CVE-2024-56582, CVE-2024-56709, CVE-2024-57913, CVE-2024-56633, CVE-2024-56639, CVE-2024-56768, CVE-2024-57799, CVE-2024-56715, CVE-2025-21653, CVE-2024-57929, CVE-2024-54680, CVE-2024-56635, CVE-2024-57801, CVE-2024-50051, CVE-2024-56609, CVE-2024-56624, CVE-2024-51729, CVE-2024-56772, CVE-2024-56785, CVE-2024-56568, CVE-2024-56577, CVE-2025-21646, CVE-2024-56713, CVE-2024-56567, CVE-2024-56777, CVE-2024-56760, CVE-2024-57899, CVE-2024-56664, CVE-2024-57879, CVE-2024-56579, CVE-2024-56758, CVE-2024-56710, CVE-2024-48875, CVE-2024-56574, CVE-2024-55641, CVE-2024-56663, CVE-2024-55639, CVE-2024-57875, CVE-2024-57910, CVE-2024-56621, CVE-2024-57791, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56774, CVE-2024-56641, CVE-2024-56601, CVE-2024-56603, CVE-2024-57897, CVE-2024-56594, CVE-2024-57882, CVE-2024-56583, CVE-2025-21639, CVE-2025-21658, CVE-2024-56575, CVE-2024-57945, CVE-2024-57907, CVE-2024-56632, CVE-2024-56629, CVE-2025-21632, CVE-2024-56596, CVE-2024-56602, CVE-2024-54683, CVE-2024-56607, CVE-2024-56764, CVE-2024-53690, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-56783, CVE-2024-57905, CVE-2024-57872, CVE-2024-56598, CVE-2024-55916, CVE-2024-54191, CVE-2024-56779, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-56562, CVE-2024-56599, CVE-2024-56620, CVE-2024-56650, CVE-2024-57926, CVE-2024-56757, CVE-2024-56669, CVE-2025-21638, CVE-2024-56675, CVE-2024-56618, CVE-2024-56593, CVE-2025-21631, CVE-2024-57933, CVE-2024-55642, CVE-2024-57884, CVE-2024-56652, CVE-2024-57903, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56642, CVE-2024-43098, CVE-2024-57838, CVE-2024-56714, CVE-2024-56716, CVE-2024-56566, CVE-2024-56781, CVE-2025-21656, CVE-2024-56372, CVE-2024-56718, CVE-2024-57932, CVE-2024-57906, CVE-2024-56759, CVE-2024-48873, CVE-2024-49569, CVE-2024-56564, CVE-2024-56770, CVE-2025-21640, CVE-2024-57792, CVE-2024-56569, CVE-2025-21633, CVE-2025-21636, CVE-2024-47143, CVE-2024-56570, CVE-2024-57880)

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Oracle Linux 10 / 9 主机上存在安装的程序包该程序包受到 ELSA-2025-20530 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    - sunrpc在 svc auth 处理期间将 SVC_GARBAGE 处理为认证错误 (Jeff Layton) [Orabug: 38137447] {CVE-2025-38089}
    - 添加 Zen34 客户端 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/process在 MONITOR 之前移动缓冲区清除 (Kim Phillips) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - 添加正常计数器 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - KVMSVM向客户机公告 TSA CPUID 位 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷添加临时计划程序攻击缓解 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38172252] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 主机上安装的一个程序包受到 USN-7381-1 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    Attila Szsz 发现 Linux 内核的 HFS+ 文件系统实施包含一个堆溢出漏洞。攻击者可利用特别构建的文件系统映像，安装此映像可造成拒绝服务（系统崩溃）或可能执行任意代码。(CVE-2025-0927)

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个安全问题。攻击者可能利用这些问题入侵系统。此更新修正了以下子系统中的缺陷：

    - ARM64 架构；

    - MIPS 架构；

    - PowerPC 架构；

    - RISC-V 架构；

    - S390 架构；

    - x86 架构；

    - 区块层子系统；

    - 计算加速框架；

    - ACPI 驱动程序；

    - 驱动程序核心；

    - Ublk userspace block 驱动程序；

    - Virtio block 驱动程序；

    - 蓝牙驱动程序；

    - 缓冲区共享和同步框架；

    - DMA 引擎子系统；

    - EFI 核心；

    - GPIO 子系统；

    - GPU 驱动程序；

    - HID 子系统；

    - Microsoft Hyper-V 驱动程序；

    - 硬件监控驱动程序；

    - I3C 子系统；

    - IIO ADC 驱动程序；

    - IIO 子系统；

    - InfiniBand 驱动程序；

    - IOMMU 子系统；

    - LED 子系统；

    - 多设备驱动程序；

    - 媒体驱动程序；

    - Microchip PCI 驱动程序；

    - MTD 块设备驱动程序；

    - 网络驱动程序；

    - Mellanox 网络驱动程序；

    - STMicroelectronics 网络驱动程序；

    - NVME 驱动程序；

    - PCI 子系统；

    - PHY 驱动程序；

    - Pin 控制器子系统；

    - x86 平台驱动程序；

    - i.MX PM 域；

    - 电源驱动程序；

    - 电压和电流调节器驱动程序；

    - SCSI 子系统；

    - i.MX SoC 驱动程序；

    - SPI 子系统；

    - UFS 子系统；

    - USB Gadget 驱动程序；

    - TDX Guest 驱动程序；

    - AFS 文件系统；

    - BTRFS 文件系统；

    - Ceph 分布式文件系统；

    - 文件系统基础设施；

    - F2FS 文件系统；

    - JFFS2 文件系统；

    - JFS 文件系统；

    - 网络文件系统库；

    - 网络文件系统 (NFS) 服务器后台程序；

    - NILFS2 文件系统；

    - 文件系统通知基础设施；

    - Overlay 文件系统；

    - Diskquota 系统；

    - SMB 网络文件系统；

    - DRM 显示驱动程序；

    - BPF 子系统；

    - VLAN 驱动程序；

    - KASAN 内存调试框架；

    - 内存管理；

    - StackDepot 库；

    - 蓝牙子系统；

    - LAPB 网络协议；

    - 网络命名空间；

    - Netfilter；

    - io_uring 子系统；

    - 控制群组 (cgroup)；

    - DMA 映射基础设施；

    - KCSAN 框架；

    - 计划程序基础设施；

    - Seccomp 子系统；

    - 跟踪基础设施；

    - Workqueue 子系统；

    - KUnit 库；

    - CAN 网络层；

    - Networking 核心；

    - DCCP（数据报拥塞控制协议）；

    - HSR 网络协议；

    - IEEE802154.4 网络协议；

    - IPv4 联网；

    - IPv6 联网；

    - MAC80211 子系统；

    - 多路径 TCP；

    - NET/ROM 层；

    - 数据包套接字；

    - RDS 协议；

    - 网络流量控制；

    - SCTP 协议；

    - SMC 套接字；

    - TIPC 协议；

    - 无线网络；

    - eXpress 数据路径；

    - SELinux 安全模块；

    - ALSA 框架；

    - Intel ASoC 驱动程序；

    - SOF 驱动程序；(CVE-2024-56712, CVE-2024-56761, CVE-2025-21661, CVE-2024-56565, CVE-2024-57804, CVE-2024-57887, CVE-2025-21642, CVE-2024-56779, CVE-2025-21656, CVE-2024-57890, CVE-2024-36476, CVE-2024-57843, CVE-2024-56594, CVE-2024-41932, CVE-2025-21653, CVE-2024-56567, CVE-2024-56665, CVE-2024-54191, CVE-2024-57893, CVE-2024-57932, CVE-2024-56656, CVE-2024-57945, CVE-2024-57931, CVE-2024-56599, CVE-2024-57897, CVE-2024-57903, CVE-2024-57918, CVE-2024-57795, CVE-2024-56662, CVE-2025-21639, CVE-2024-55881, CVE-2024-57889, CVE-2024-57884, CVE-2024-57934, CVE-2024-39282, CVE-2024-56718, CVE-2024-56644, CVE-2024-56760, CVE-2024-43098, CVE-2024-47143, CVE-2024-55642, CVE-2024-56634, CVE-2024-56564, CVE-2024-56768, CVE-2024-56649, CVE-2024-57919, CVE-2024-56620, CVE-2024-56625, CVE-2024-56655, CVE-2024-56772, CVE-2025-21637, CVE-2024-56617, CVE-2024-57879, CVE-2024-56715, CVE-2024-56550, CVE-2024-50051, CVE-2024-56673, CVE-2024-51729, CVE-2025-21664, CVE-2025-21649, CVE-2024-56605, CVE-2024-56622, CVE-2024-56591, CVE-2024-56782, CVE-2024-57801, CVE-2024-56664, CVE-2024-57916, CVE-2024-53680, CVE-2024-57926, CVE-2024-56637, CVE-2024-56769, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-56648, CVE-2024-57872, CVE-2024-56593, CVE-2024-57913, CVE-2024-53682, CVE-2024-56670, CVE-2024-56767, CVE-2024-56778, CVE-2024-56777, CVE-2025-21658, CVE-2025-21646, CVE-2024-48875, CVE-2024-56758, CVE-2024-56604, CVE-2024-56787, CVE-2024-56581, CVE-2025-21635, CVE-2024-56641, CVE-2024-56608, CVE-2024-57885, CVE-2024-56716, CVE-2024-56671, CVE-2024-56559, CVE-2025-21633, CVE-2024-56372, CVE-2024-57888, CVE-2024-56623, CVE-2025-21638, CVE-2024-56600, CVE-2024-56647, CVE-2025-21659, CVE-2024-41935, CVE-2024-56624, CVE-2024-56574, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2024-56621, CVE-2024-54460, CVE-2024-56659, CVE-2024-47141, CVE-2024-57805, CVE-2024-57792, CVE-2024-45828, CVE-2024-53681, CVE-2024-56568, CVE-2024-56764, CVE-2025-21650, CVE-2024-56601, CVE-2024-56663, CVE-2025-21660, CVE-2025-21629, CVE-2024-56595, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-53685, CVE-2024-57882, CVE-2024-57894, CVE-2024-56651, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-57876, CVE-2024-56717, CVE-2024-57935, CVE-2024-56667, CVE-2024-57910, CVE-2024-57793, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56638, CVE-2025-21640, CVE-2024-56710, CVE-2024-56583, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56658, CVE-2025-21632, CVE-2024-56645, CVE-2024-56646, CVE-2024-56640, CVE-2024-57944, CVE-2024-56598, CVE-2024-57857, CVE-2024-56709, CVE-2024-56654, CVE-2024-57809, CVE-2024-57895, CVE-2025-21834, CVE-2024-56763, CVE-2024-48881, CVE-2024-57841, CVE-2024-57878, CVE-2024-56774, CVE-2024-57791, CVE-2024-56575, CVE-2024-56619, CVE-2024-56570, CVE-2024-56616, CVE-2024-56569, CVE-2025-21636, CVE-2024-56572, CVE-2024-56552, CVE-2024-56596, CVE-2025-21654, CVE-2024-56573, CVE-2024-56784, CVE-2024-56626, CVE-2024-56642, CVE-2024-56643, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-56632, CVE-2024-57839, CVE-2024-56578, CVE-2024-53690, CVE-2024-56609, CVE-2024-56562, CVE-2024-56589, CVE-2024-56781, CVE-2024-56672, CVE-2024-56775, CVE-2024-56713, CVE-2024-56580, CVE-2024-57874, CVE-2024-56369, CVE-2024-56711, CVE-2025-21651, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-57904, CVE-2024-54680, CVE-2024-56577, CVE-2024-56558, CVE-2024-56780, CVE-2024-58087, CVE-2024-57892, CVE-2025-21644, CVE-2024-57911, CVE-2024-56579, CVE-2025-21663, CVE-2024-56618, CVE-2024-56766, CVE-2024-56653, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2024-56669, CVE-2024-56759, CVE-2024-48876, CVE-2025-21631, CVE-2024-56765, CVE-2024-56770, CVE-2024-57838, CVE-2025-21634, CVE-2024-56650, CVE-2024-57939, CVE-2024-56606, CVE-2024-56610, CVE-2025-21662, CVE-2024-56785, CVE-2024-55916, CVE-2025-21643, CVE-2024-56586, CVE-2024-56582, CVE-2024-56614, CVE-2024-49571, CVE-2024-49569, CVE-2024-57798, CVE-2024-56633, CVE-2024-55641, CVE-2025-21647, CVE-2025-21652, CVE-2024-56757, CVE-2024-56597, CVE-2024-47794, CVE-2024-57902, CVE-2024-57925, CVE-2024-54683, CVE-2024-57938, CVE-2024-56615, CVE-2024-57906, CVE-2024-53687, CVE-2024-57899, CVE-2024-56783, CVE-2024-56786, CVE-2024-56635, CVE-2024-56551, CVE-2024-53179, CVE-2024-56588, CVE-2024-47408, CVE-2024-57849, CVE-2024-52319, CVE-2024-56576, CVE-2024-57905, CVE-2024-57946, CVE-2024-56607, CVE-2024-57806, CVE-2024-57933, CVE-2024-55639, CVE-2024-56561, CVE-2024-48873, CVE-2024-52332, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2024-56602, CVE-2024-56590, CVE-2024-57799, CVE-2024-57929, CVE-2024-56639, CVE-2024-56613, CVE-2024-56675, CVE-2024-57912, CVE-2024-57883, CVE-2024-56636, CVE-2024-56592, CVE-2024-57802, CVE-2024-54455, CVE-2024-57908, CVE-2024-56603, CVE-2024-57875, CVE-2024-56773, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-56630, CVE-2024-56587, CVE-2024-56627, CVE-2024-57921, CVE-2024-56660, CVE-2024-56771, CVE-2024-57886, CVE-2024-57896, CVE-2024-57807, CVE-2024-57907, CVE-2024-49568, CVE-2024-54193, CVE-2024-56652, CVE-2024-57940, CVE-2024-57898, CVE-2024-57901, CVE-2024-56714, CVE-2024-56566, CVE-2024-56563, CVE-2024-56368, CVE-2024-56611, CVE-2024-56776, CVE-2024-57850, CVE-2024-56629, CVE-2024-57881, CVE-2024-57880, CVE-2024-57900)

Tenable 已直接从 Ubuntu 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程 Oracle Linux 9 主机上安装的程序包受到 ELSA-2025-20480 公告中提及的多个漏洞影响。

    - sunrpc在 svc auth 处理期间将 SVC_GARBAGE 处理为认证错误 (Jeff Layton) [Orabug: 38178286] {CVE-2025-38089}
    - 添加 Zen34 客户端 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/process在 MONITOR 之前移动缓冲区清除 (Kim Phillips) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - 添加正常计数器 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - KVMSVM向客户机公告 TSA CPUID 位 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷添加临时计划程序攻击缓解 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - x86/缺陷将 MDS 机械重命名为更通用的名称 (Borislav Petkov (AMD)) [Orabug: 38023239] {CVE-2024-36350} {CVE-2024-36357}
    - block修复将 folio 添加到 bio (Ming Lei) [Orabug: 37844657] {CVE-2025-22122}
    - f2fs修复以避免访问未初始化的curseg (Chao Yu) [Orabug: 37844644] {CVE-2025-22123}
    - gpio: virtuser修复潜在的越界写入 (Markus Burri) [Orabug: 38095181] {CVE-2025-38082}
    - net_schedhfsc地址可重入队列两次向 eltree 添加类 (Pedro Tammela) [Orabug
    38049363] {CVE-2025-38001}
    - smb客户端修复 cifs_fill_dirent 中的释放后使用 (Zhaolong Wang) [Orabug: 38094970] {CVE-2025-38051}
    - platform/x86dell-wmi-sysman避免 current_password_store() 中的缓冲区溢出 (Vladimir Moskovkin) [Orabug: 38095141] {CVE-2025-38077}
    - ALSApcm修复 PCM OSS 层的缓冲区访问争用 (Takashi Iwai) [Orabug: 38095145] {CVE-2025-38078}
    - canbcm添加 procfs 内容缺少的 rcu 读取保护 (Oliver Hartkopp) [Orabug: 38049369] {CVE-2025-38003}
    - canbcm为 bcm_op 运行时更新添加锁定 (Oliver Hartkopp) [Orabug: 38049374] {CVE-2025-38004}
    - padata请勿泄漏 reorder_work 中的引用计数 (Dominik Grzegorzek) [Orabug38094842] {CVE-2025-38031}
    - cryptoalgif_hash - 修复 hash_accept 中的双重释放 (Ivan Pravdin) [Orabug: 38095153] {CVE-2025-38079}
    - net/tipc修复 tipc_aead_encrypt_done 中的 slab-use-after-free 读取 (Wang Liu) [Orabug: 38094978] {CVE-2025-38052}
    - sch_hfsc修复在 hfsc_enqueue() 中使用 peek 时的 qlen 核算缺陷 (Cong Wang) [Orabug: 38049357] {CVE-2025-38000}
    - idpf修复 idpf_features_check 中的 null-ptr-deref (Pavan Kumar Linga) [Orabug: 38094982] {CVE-2025-38053}
    - ptpocp限制汇总输出函数中的信号/频率计数 (Sagi Maimon) [Orabug: 38094984] {CVE-2025-38054}
    - perf/x86/intel修复包含 sample_freq 的 PEBS-via-PT 的段错误 (Adrian Hunter) [Orabug: 38094988] {CVE-2025-38055}
    - ASoCSOF: Intelhda重新加载模块时修复 UAF (Tabian Barnes) [Orabug: 38094991] {CVE-2025-38056}
    - espintcp修复 skb 泄露 (Sabrina Dubroca) [Orabug: 38094993] {CVE-2025-38057}
    - __legitimize_mnt()应在 mount_lock 下进行 MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT 检查 (Al Viro) [Orabug: 38095000] {CVE-2025-38058}
    - x86/Kconfig使 CFI_AUTO_DEFAULT 依赖于 !RUST 或 Rust >= 1.88 (Pawel Anikiel) [Orabug: 38094847] {CVE-2025-38033}
    - btrfs如果无有效 csum 树则避免空指针取消引用 (Qu Wenruo) [Orabug38095010] {CVE-2025-38059}
    - btrfs修正 btrfs__prelim_ref 中 prelim_ref 参数的顺序 (Goldwyn Rodrigues) [Orabug:
    38094856] {CVE-2025-38034}
    - nvmet-tcp不恢复空 sk_state_change (Alistair Francisco) [Orabug: 38094863] {CVE-2025-38035}
    - vxlan注释 FDB 数据争用 (Ido Schimmel) [Orabug: 38094879] {CVE-2025-38037}
    - cpufreqamd-pstate删除 set_boost 中不必要的 driver_lock (Dhananjay Ugwekar) [Orabug: 38094888] {CVE-2025-38038}
    - drm/amd/display增加 block_sequence 数组大小 (Joshua Aberback) [Orabug38095164] {CVE-2025-38080}
    - bpfcopy_verifier_state() 应复制“loop_entry”字段 (Eduard Zingerman) [Orabug38095018] {CVE-2025-38060}
    - serialmctrl_gpio将 disable_ms 拆分为 sync 和 no_sync API (Alexis Lothore) [Orabug: 38094901] {CVE-2025-38040}
    - netpktgen修复 pktgen_thread_write() 中用户指定缓冲区之外的访问 (Peter Seiderer) [Orabug
    38095024] {CVE-2025-38061}
    - genirq/msi将 IOMMU IOVA 直接存储在 msi_desc 而不是 iommu_cookie 中 (Jason Gunthorpe) [Orabug:
    38095031] {CVE-2025-38062}
    - dm修复 REQ_PREFLUSH 造成的无条件 IO 节流 (Jinliang Zheng) [Orabug38095038] {CVE-2025-38063}
    - firmwarearm_ffa设置 ffa 设备的 dma_mask (Viresh Kumar) [Orabug38094925] {CVE-2025-38043}
    - mediacx231xx设置 417 的 device_caps (Hans Verkuil) [Orabug38094934] {CVE-2025-38044}
    - Orangefs不截断文件大小 (Matthew Wilcox) [Orabug: 38095056] {CVE-2025-38065}
    - dm 缓存通过阻止设备恢复失败的重试来防止 BUG_ON (Ming-Hung Tsai) [Orabug:
    38095063] {CVE-2025-38066}
    - cryptolzo - 修复压缩缓冲区溢出 (Herbert Xu) [Orabug38095079] {CVE-2025-38068}
    - PCI 端点pci-epf-test修复导致内核 oops 的双重释放 (Christian Bruel) [Orabug
    38095087] {CVE-2025-38069}
    - wifiiwlwifi修复调试操作顺序 (Johannes Berg) [Orabug38094942] {CVE-2025-38045}
    - x86/mm检查 memblock_phys_alloc_range() 的返回值 (Philip Redkin) [Orabug: 38095101] {CVE-2025-38071}
    - libnvdimm/labels修复 nd_label_data_init() 中的除法错误 (Robert Richter) [Orabug: 38095109] {CVE-2025-38072}
    - spi-rockchip修复寄存器越界访问 (Luis de Arquer) [Orabug38095173] {CVE-2025-38081}
    - x86/fred修复启用 FRED 的 S4 恢复期间的系统挂起 (Xin Li) [Orabug: 38094951] {CVE-2025-38047}
    - block修复 set_blocksize 和读取路径之间的争用 (Darrick J. Wong) [Orabug38095117] {CVE-2025-38073}
    - virtio_ring通过将 event_triggered 标记为 KCSAN 的 racy修复数据争用 (Zhongqiu Han) [Orabug:
    38094958] {CVE-2025-38048}
    - scsitargetiscsi修复已删除连接的超时 (Dmitry Bogdanov) [Orabug38095134] {CVE-2025-38075}
    - usbtypecucsidisplayport修复死锁 (Andrei Kuchynski) [Orabug: 37977018] {CVE-2025-37967}
    - 蓝牙btnxpuart修复 FW 发布期间的内核错误 (Neeraj Sanjay Kale) [Orabug: 37844459] {CVE-2025-22102}
    - iiolight opt3001修复因并发标记访问导致的死锁 (Luca Ceresoli) [Orabug: 37977026] {CVE-2025-37968}
    - mm/page_alloc修复未接受内存处理中的争用条件 (Kirill A. Shutemov) [Orabug: 38094767] {CVE-2025-38008}
    - dmaengineidxd使用 idxd_cleanup() 帮助程序重构删除调用 (Shuai Xue) [Orabug38094790] {CVE-2025-38014}
    - dmaengineidxd修复 idxd_alloc 的错误处理路径中的内存泄漏 (Shuai Xue) [Orabug: 38094793] {CVE-2025-38015}
    - dmaenginetik3-udma添加缺失的锁定 (Ronald Wahl) [Orabug38094756] {CVE-2025-38005}
    - wifimt76在删除驱动程序时禁用 napi (Fedor Pchelkin) [Orabug38094770] {CVE-2025-38009}
    - phytegraxusb将位掩码用于 UTMI pad 电源状态跟踪 (Wane Chang) [Orabug: 38094777] {CVE-2025-38010}
    - drm/amdgpucsa unmap 使用不间断锁定 (Philip Yang) [Orabug: 38094779] {CVE-2025-38011}
    - HIDbpf中止调度如果设备遭到破坏 (Rongrong) [Orabug38094796] {CVE-2025-38016}
    - sched_extbpf_iter_scx_dsq_new() 应始终初始化迭代器 (Tejun Heo) [Orabug: 38094786] {CVE-2025-38012}
    - net/tls修复 alloc_page 失败时的内核错误 (Pengtao He) [Orabug: 38094802] {CVE-2025-38018}
    - mlxswspectrum_router修复删除 GRE 网络设备时的释放后使用 (Ido Schimmel) [Orabug
    38094804] {CVE-2025-38019}
    - wifimac80211分配 struct cfg80211_scan_request 后设置 n_channels (Kees Cook) [Orabug
    38094788] {CVE-2025-38013}
    - regulatormax20086修复无效的内存访问 (Cosmin Tanislav) [Orabug: 38094833] {CVE-2025-38027}
    - net/mlx5e禁用上行链路representor配置文件的 MACsec 卸载 (Carolina Jubran) [Orabug: 38094808] {CVE-2025-38020}
    - net_sched ->change() 期间也刷新 gso_skb 列表 (Cong Wang) [Orabug37998128] {CVE-2025-37992}
    - RDMA/core修复“KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in ib_register_device”问题 (Zhu Yanjun) [Orabug:
    38094813] {CVE-2025-38022}
    - nfs处理解锁路径中的 nfs_get_lock_context 失败 (Li Lingfeng) [Orabug38094818] {CVE-2025-38023}
    - HIDuclogic在 uclogic_input_configured() 中添加空检查 (Henry Martin) [Orabug: 38094764] {CVE-2025-38007}
    - RDMA/rxe修复 rxe_queue_cleanup 缺陷中的 slab-use-after-free 读取 (Zhu Yanjun) [Orabug: 38094827] {CVE-2025-38024}
    - arm64bpf仅缓解非特权用户加载的 cBPF 程序 (James Morse) [Orabug: 37977004] {CVE-2025-37963}
    - arm64bpf将 BHB 缓解添加到 cBPF 程序的尾声 (James Morse) [Orabug37976926] {CVE-2025-37948}
    - usbtypecucsidisplayport修复空指针访问 (Andrei Kuchynski) [Orabug: 38015126] {CVE-2025-37994}
    - 模块确保 kobject_put() 对于模块类型 kobjects 是安全的 (Dmitry Antipov) [Orabug: 38015131] {CVE-2025-37995}
    - memblock接受分配的内存然后在 memblock_double_array() 中使用 (Tom Lendacky) [Orabug:
    37976994] {CVE-2025-37960}
    - xenbus使用 kref 跟踪 req 生命周期 (Jason Andryuk) [Orabug: 37976934] {CVE-2025-37949}
    - smb 客户端通过租用中断避免 open_cached_dir 中发生争用 (Paul Aurich) [Orabug37976959] {CVE-2025-37954}
    - drm/amd/display修复 dml 帮助程序中的无效上下文错误 (Roman Li) [Orabug: 37977185] {CVE-2025-37965}
    - drm/v3d如果跳过重置则将作业添加至待定列表 (Maira Canal) [Orabug: 37976942] {CVE-2025-37951}
    - iioimu st_lsm6dsx修复 st_lsm6dsx_read_taged_fifo 中可能的锁定 (Silvano Seva) [Orabug:
    37977031] {CVE-2025-37969}
    - iioimust_lsm6dsx修复 st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo 中可能的锁定 (Silvano Seva) [Orabug: 37977037] {CVE-2025-37970}
    - KVMSVMSHUTDOWN 拦截时强制离开 SMM 模式 (Mikhail Lobanov) [Orabug37976977] {CVE-2025-37957}
    - mm/huge_memory修复取消引用无效的 pmd 迁移条目 (Gavin Guo) [Orabug37976982] {CVE-2025-37958}
    - x86/mm消除可能会无意间跳过 TLB 刷新的窗口 (Dave Hansen) [Orabug: 37977013] {CVE-2025-37964}
    - stagingbcm2835-camera初始化 v4l2_dev 中的 dev (Dave Stevenson) [Orabug: 37977042] {CVE-2025-37971}
    - Inputmtk-pmic-keys - 修复可能存在的空指针取消引用 (Gary Bisson) [Orabug37977044] {CVE-2025-37972}
    - bpfbpf_redirect_peer 上的清理数据包(Paul Chaignon) [Orabug37976990] {CVE-2025-37959}
    - netfilteripset修复哈希类型中的区域锁定 (Jozsef Kadlecsik) [Orabug38015141] {CVE-2025-37997}
    - ipvs修复 do_output_route4 中 saddr 的 uninit-value (Julian Anastasov) [Orabug: 37976996] {CVE-2025-37961}
    - canm_canm_can_class_allocate_dev()初始化设备探测上的旋转锁定 (Antonios Salios) [Orabug
    38015123] {CVE-2025-37993}
    - virtio-net在 virtnet_xsk_pool_enable() 中发生错误时释放 xsk_buffs (Jakub Kicinski) [Orabug: 37976969] {CVE-2025-37955}
    - sch_htb使 htb_deactivate() 幂等 (Cong Wang) [Orabug: 37977176] {CVE-2025-37953}
    - ksmbd修复 parse_lease_state() 中的内存泄漏 (Zhaolong Wang) [Orabug: 37977180] {CVE-2025-37962}
    - openvswitch修复 output_userspace() 中不安全的属性解析 (Eelco Chaudron) [Orabug38015148] {CVE-2025-37998}
    - ksmbd修复 __close_file_table_ids 中的 UAF (Sean Heelan) [Orabug: 37976951] {CVE-2025-37952}
    - ksmbd通过验证 *pos 防止越界流写入 (Norbert Szetei) [Orabug: 37976923] {CVE-2025-37947}
    - ksmbd防止使用空字符串重命名 (Namjae Jeon) [Orabug37976972] {CVE-2025-37956}
    - s390/pci当 PF 具有子 VF 时修复 disable_slot() 中的重复 pci_dev_put() (Niklas Schnelle) [Orabug
    37976920] {CVE-2025-37946}
    - wificfg80211修复多链接元素碎片整理期间的越界访问 (Veerendranath Jakkam) [Orabug: 37977046] {CVE-2025-37973}
    - s390/pci修复缺少检查的 zpci_create_device() 错误返回 (Niklas Schnelle) [Orabug: 37977050] {CVE-2025-37974}
    - fs/erofs/fileio调用 bio_add_folio() 之后调用 erofs_onlinefolio_split() (Max Kellermann) [Orabug
    38015155] {CVE-2025-37999}
    - mlxbf-bootctl在 secure_boot_fuse_state_show() 中使用 sysfs_emit_at() (David Thomson) [Orabug
    37964051,38037120] {CVE-2025-37866}

Tenable 已直接从 Oracle Linux 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - 在 Linux 内核中，已解决以下漏洞： arm64: ptrace: fix partial SETREGSET for NT_ARM_FPMR Currently fpmr_set() doesn't initialize the temporary 'fpmr' variable, and a SETREGSET call with a length of zero will leave this uninitialized. Consequently an arbitrary value will be written back to target->thread.uw.fpmr, potentially leaking up to 64 bits of memory from the kernel stack. The read is limited to a specific slot on the stack, and the issue does not provide a write mechanism. Fix this by initializing the temporary value before copying the regset from userspace, as for other regsets (e.g. NT_PRSTATUS, NT_PRFPREG, NT_ARM_SYSTEM_CALL). In the case of a zero-length write, the existing contents of FPMR will be retained. Before this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0xffff800083963d50 After this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d (CVE-2024-57878)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

AlmaLinux 9.6 主机上存在安装的程序包，该程序包受到 TuxCare ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：2026：1791800936公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：kunit: Fix potential null dereference in kunit_device_driver_test() kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without NULL check may lead to NULL dereference. Add a NULL check for test_state. (CVE-2024-56773)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：arm64: ptrace: fix partial SETREGSET for NT_ARM_FPMR Currently fpmr_set() doesn't initialize the temporary 'fpmr' variable, and a SETREGSET call with a length of zero will leave this uninitialized. Consequently an arbitrary value will be written back to target->thread.uw.fpmr, potentially leaking up to 64 bits of memory from the kernel stack. The read is limited to a specific slot on the stack, and the issue does not provide a write mechanism. Fix this by initializing the temporary value before copying the regset from userspace, as for other regsets (e.g. NT_PRSTATUS, NT_PRFPREG, NT_ARM_SYSTEM_CALL). In the case of a zero-length write, the existing contents of FPMR will be retained. Before this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0xffff800083963d50 After this patch: | # ./fpmr-test | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) wrote 8 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d | | Attempting to write NT_ARM_FPMR (zero length) | SETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=0) wrote 0 bytes | | Attempting to read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr | GETREGSET(nt=0x40e, len=8) read 8 bytes | Read NT_ARM_FPMR::fpmr = 0x900d900d900d900d (CVE-2024-57878)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：mptcp: fix 'scheduling while atomic' in mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr If multiple connection requests attempt to create an implicit mptcp endpoint in parallel, more than one caller may end up in mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr because none found the address in local_addr_list during their call to mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id. In this case, the concurrent new_local_addr calls may delete the address entry created by the previous caller. These deletes use synchronize_rcu, but this is not permitted in some of the contexts where this function may be called.
    During packet recv, the caller may be in a rcu read critical section and have preemption disabled. An example stack: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/2/0/0x00000302 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117 (discriminator 1)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:124) __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:5943) schedule_debug.constprop.0 (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:33 kernel/sched/core.c:5970) __schedule (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 include/linux/jump_label.h:207 kernel/sched/features.h:29 kernel/sched/core.c:6621) schedule (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 kernel/sched/core.c:6804 kernel/sched/core.c:6818) schedule_timeout (kernel/time/timer.c:2160) wait_for_completion (kernel/sched/completion.c:96 kernel/sched/completion.c:116 kernel/sched/completion.c:127 kernel/sched/completion.c:148) __wait_rcu_gp (include/linux/rcupdate.h:311 kernel/rcu/update.c:444) synchronize_rcu (kernel/rcu/tree.c:3609) mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr (net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:966 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1061) mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id (net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1164) mptcp_pm_get_local_id (net/mptcp/pm.c:420) subflow_check_req (net/mptcp/subflow.c:98 net/mptcp/subflow.c:213) subflow_v4_route_req (net/mptcp/subflow.c:305) tcp_conn_request (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7216) subflow_v4_conn_request (net/mptcp/subflow.c:651) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6709) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934) tcp_v4_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2334) ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 (discriminator 1)) ip_local_deliver_finish (include/linux/rcupdate.h:813 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234) ip_local_deliver (include/linux/netfilter.h:314 include/linux/netfilter.h:308 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:254) ip_sublist_rcv_finish (include/net/dst.h:461 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:580) ip_sublist_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:640) ip_list_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:675) __netif_receive_skb_list_core (net/core/dev.c:5583 net/core/dev.c:5631) netif_receive_skb_list_internal (net/core/dev.c:5685 net/core/dev.c:5774) napi_complete_done (include/linux/list.h:37 include/net/gro.h:449 include/net/gro.h:444 net/core/dev.c:6114) igb_poll (drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:8244) igb
    __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:6582) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:6653 net/core/dev.c:6787) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:553) __irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:588 kernel/softirq.c:427 kernel/softirq.c:636) irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:651) common_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 (discriminator 14)) </IRQ> This problem seems particularly prevalent if the user advertises an endpoint that has a different external vs internal address. In the case where the external address is advertised and multiple connections already exist, multiple subflow SYNs arrive in parallel which tends to trigger the race during creation of the first local_addr_list entries which have the internal address instead. Fix by skipping the replacement of an existing implicit local address if called via mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id. (CVE-2025-21938)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：devlink: fix xa_alloc_cyclic() error handling In case of returning 1 from xa_alloc_cyclic() (wrapping) ERR_PTR(1) will be returned, which will cause IS_ERR() to be false. Which can lead to dereference not allocated pointer (rel). Fix it by checking if err is lower than zero. This wasn't found in real usecase, only noticed. Credit to Pierre.
    (CVE-2025-22017)

  - 已修复 Linux 内核中的下列漏洞：drm/xe: Use local fence in error path of xe_migrate_clear The intent of the error path in xe_migrate_clear is to wait on locally generated fence and then return. The code is waiting on m->fence which could be the local fence but this is only stable under the job mutex leading to a possible UAF. Fix code to wait on local fence. (cherry picked from commit 762b7e95362170b3e13a8704f38d5e47eca4ba74) (CVE-2025-37869)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名称	产品	系列	发布时间	最近更新时间	严重程度
233672	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS / 24.10：Linux kernel 漏洞 (USN-7379-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2025/4/1	2026/6/3	high
233675	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS：Linux 内核 (OEM) 漏洞 (USN-7382-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2025/4/1	2026/1/6	high
364682	Rocky Linux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1791800936）	Nessus	Rocky Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/12	2026/10/13	high
233479	Ubuntu 24.10：Linux 内核（低延迟）漏洞 (USN-7380-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2025/3/28	2026/1/6	high
252244	Oracle Linux 10 / 9Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2025-20530)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2025/8/19	2026/2/9	medium
233673	Ubuntu 24.04 LTS：Linux kernel（低延迟）漏洞 (USN-7381-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	2025/4/1	2026/1/6	high
242347	Oracle Linux 9：Unbreakable Enterprise 内核 (ELSA-2025-20480)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	2025/7/18	2026/2/9	medium
230823	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞: CVE-2024-57878	Nessus	Misc.	2025/3/6	2026/7/18	medium
364689	AlmaLinux 9.6 [TuxCare] 安全更新：kernel / kernel-64k / kernel-64k-core / kernel-64k-debug / 等多个漏洞（ALMALINUX9.6：CLSA-2026：1791800936）	Nessus	Alma Linux Local Security Checks	2026/10/12	2026/10/13	high

检测

插件搜索

high

high

high

high

medium

high

medium

medium

high